PETERS et al. v. VEASEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF VEASEY (1919)

![]() |
PETERS et al. v. VEASEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF VEASEY |
---|
Term: 1919 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 14, 1919 |
Decided: December 8, 1919 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
William Rufus Day • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • James Clark McReynolds • Mahlon Pitney • Willis Van Devanter • Edward Douglass White |
Dissenting |
Louis Dembitz Brandeis • John Hessin Clarke |
PETERS et al. v. VEASEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF VEASEY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 8, 1919. The case was argued before the court on November 14, 1919.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Louisiana State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1910s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Retroactivity (of newly announced or newly enacted constitutional or statutory rights)
- Petitioner: Water transportation, stevedore
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Employee, or job applicant, including beneficiaries of
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 251 U.S. 121
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
- Who wrote the majority opinion: James Clark McReynolds
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes