Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

PHILIP PARKER, WARDEN v. DAVID EUGENE MATTHEWS (2012)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
PHILIP PARKER, WARDEN v. DAVID EUGENE MATTHEWS
Term: 2011
Important Dates
Decided: June 11, 2012
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Elena Kagan • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Sonia Sotomayor • Clarence Thomas

PHILIP PARKER, WARDEN v. DAVID EUGENE MATTHEWS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 11, 2012.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Kentucky Western U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2010s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Habeas corpus
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: Kentucky
  • Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 567 U.S. 37
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=PHILIP_PARKER,_WARDEN_v._DAVID_EUGENE_MATTHEWS_(2012)&oldid=9502193"