Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
PHILLIPS ET VIR v. CALIFORNIA (1967)

![]() |
PHILLIPS ET VIR v. CALIFORNIA |
---|
Term: 1966 |
Important Dates |
Decided: February 27, 1967 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
8-1 |
Majority |
William Brennan • William Douglas • Abe Fortas • Potter Stewart • Earl Warren • Byron White |
Concurring |
Hugo Black • Tom Clark |
Dissenting |
John Harlan II |
PHILLIPS ET VIR v. CALIFORNIA is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 27, 1967.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - self-incrimination (other than as pertains to Miranda or immunity from prosecution)
- Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 386 U.S. 212
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes