Know your vote. Take a look at your sample ballot now!

PIERCE, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT v. UNDERWOOD et al. (1988)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
PIERCE, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT v. UNDERWOOD et al.
Term: 1987
Important Dates
Argued: December 1, 1987
Decided: June 27, 1988
Outcome
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Vote
6-2
Majority
William RehnquistAntonin ScaliaJohn Paul Stevens
Concurring
Harry BlackmunWilliam BrennanThurgood Marshall
Dissenting
Sandra Day O'ConnorByron White

PIERCE, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT v. UNDERWOOD et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 27, 1988. The case was argued before the court on December 1, 1987.

In a 6-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Central U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Attorneys - Attorneys' and governmental employees' or officials' fees or compensation or licenses
  • Petitioner: Department or Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Tenant or lessee
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 487 U.S. 552
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes