Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

PIERRE CLAUDE PIQUIGNOT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY (1854)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
PIERRE CLAUDE PIQUIGNOT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY
Term: 1853
Important Dates
Decided: February 27, 1854
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
9-0
Majority
John Archibald CampbellJohn CatronBenjamin Robbins CurtisPeter Vivian DanielRobert Cooper GrierJohn McLeanSamuel NelsonRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne

PIERRE CLAUDE PIQUIGNOT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 27, 1854.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Pennsylvania U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of Pennsylvania.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1850s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Judicial Power - judicial administration: Supreme Court jurisdiction or authority on appeal or writ of error, from federal district courts or courts of appeals (cf. 753)
  • Petitioner: Physically injured person, including wrongful death, who is not an employee
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Railroad
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 57 U.S. 104
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Robert Cooper Grier

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes