PORT OF SEATTLE v. OREGON & WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY et al. (1921)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
PORT OF SEATTLE v. OREGON & WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY et al.
Term: 1920
Important Dates
Argued: December 6, 1920
Decided: January 31, 1921
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
9-0
Majority
Louis Dembitz BrandeisJohn Hessin ClarkeWilliam Rufus DayOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaJames Clark McReynoldsMahlon PitneyWillis Van DevanterEdward Douglass White

PORT OF SEATTLE v. OREGON & WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 31, 1921. The case was argued before the court on December 6, 1920.

In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Washington Western U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1920s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the White Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation. cf. state regulation of business. rarely involves union activity. Does not involve constitutional interpretation unless the Court says it does.
  • Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 255 U.S. 56
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Edward Douglass White
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Louis Dembitz Brandeis

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes