Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

PULLMAN-STANDARD, A DIVISION OF PULLMAN, INC. v. SWINT et al. (1982)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
PULLMAN-STANDARD, A DIVISION OF PULLMAN, INC. v. SWINT et al.
Term: 1981
Important Dates
Argued: January 19, 1982
Decided: April 27, 1982
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-2
Majority
William BrennanWarren BurgerSandra Day O'ConnorLewis PowellWilliam RehnquistByron White
Concurring
John Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Harry BlackmunThurgood Marshall

PULLMAN-STANDARD, A DIVISION OF PULLMAN, INC. v. SWINT et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 27, 1982. The case was argued before the court on January 19, 1982.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Alabama Northern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Burger Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - employment discrimination: on basis of race, age, religion, illegitimacy, national origin, or working conditions.
  • Petitioner: employer. If employer's relations with employees are governed by the nature of the employer's business (e.g., railroad, boat), rather than labor law generally, the more specific designation is used in place of Employer.
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Racial or ethnic minority employee or job applicant
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 456 U.S. 273
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Warren Burger
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Byron White

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes