Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph v. State of Oregon

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Laws governing ballot measures

BallotLaw final.png

State
Laws governing state initiative processes
Laws governing state recall processes
Changes to ballot measure law in 2025
Difficulty analysis of changes to laws governing ballot measures
Analysis of 2025 changes to laws governing ballot measures
Local
Laws governing local ballot measures

Learn about Ballotpedia's election legislation tracker.

2026 »
« 2024

Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph v. State of Oregon was a 1912 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether Oregon’s relatively new (1902) initiative and referendum system violated the Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court sidestepped the issue by holding that whether a state has a republican form of government is a political question not subject to judicial review.

A 1906 initiative was passed in Oregon that taxed certain classes of corporations, including telephone and telegraph companies. Subsequently, a corporation, the Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Company, was assessed the tax, which they declined to pay. Litigation went forward when the state of Oregon sued the company for the back taxes it owed under the provisions of the 1906 initiative.

In 1907, Hartig v. City of Seattle, asking a similar question, was heard by the Washington Supreme Court, which reached a similar conclusion about that state's newly-enacted I&R laws.

External links