Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.

Pamela Gates

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was last updated during the official's most recent election or appointment. Please contact us with any updates.
Pamela Gates

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png

Do you have a photo that could go here? Click here to submit it for this profile!


Maricopa County Superior Court
Tenure
Present officeholder
Term ends

2029

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 5, 2024

Appointed

2009

Education

Bachelor's

Drake University, 1993

Law

University of Iowa College of Law, 1996

Pamela Gates is a judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court in Arizona. Her current term ends on January 1, 2029.

Gates ran for re-election for judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court in Arizona. She won in the retention election on November 5, 2024.

Gates was appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R) in October 2009.[1]

Biography

Gates received an undergraduate degree from Drake University and a J.D. from the University of Iowa College of Law.[2]

Prior to her appointment to the court in 2009, Gates was a partner at Bryan Cave LLP and an attorney at O'Connor Cavanagh. She also interned with the United States attorney's office in 1994.[2]

Elections

2024

See also:  Municipal elections in Maricopa County, Arizona (2024)

Maricopa County Superior Court, Pam Gates's seat

Pamela Gates was retained to the Maricopa County Superior Court on November 5, 2024 with 77.0% of the vote.

Retention
 Vote
%
Votes
Yes
 
77.0
 
950,344
No
 
23.0
 
284,438
Total Votes
1,234,782


Endorsements

Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Gates in this election.

2020

Maricopa County Superior Court, Pamela Gates's seat

Pamela Gates was retained to the Maricopa County Superior Court on November 3, 2020 with 77.2% of the vote.

Retention
 Vote
%
Votes
Yes
 
77.2
 
975,233
No
 
22.8
 
287,316
Total Votes
1,262,549

2016

See also: Arizona local trial court judicial elections, 2016

Arizona held elections for 80 superior court judgeships on November 8, 2016. Sixty-three of those seats were up for retention election. Three counties—Maricopa, Pima, and Pinal—use retention elections for their superior courts.[3]

Maricopa County Superior Court, Pamela Gates Retention Election, 2016
Name Yes votes
Green check mark transparent.pngPamela Gates74.85%
Source: Maricopa County, Arizona, "November 8, 2016 General Election," November 9, 2016 These election results are unofficial and will be updated after official vote totals are made available.

2012

See also: Arizona judicial elections, 2012 - Superior Courts

Gates was retained with 71.19 percent of the vote in the general election on November 6, 2012.[4][5]

Campaign themes

2024

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Pamela Gates did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.

2020

Pamela Gates did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy cases

Aguila v. Ducey (2020)

See also: Lawsuits about state actions and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020-2021

Aguila v. Ducey: On September 8, 2020, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Pamela Gates declined to block Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey’s (R) COVID-19 business restrictions, which shutter bars while allowing restaurants to remain open and serve alcohol. In their complaint, which was originally filed in the state supreme court, a group of Arizona bar owners argued that they faced impermissible discrimination based on their liquor license series. They said that bars with "series 6 or 7 liquor licenses are subject to closure orders in Executive Order 2020-43," while roughly 5,000 restaurant bars, hotel bars, microbreweries, wineries, private clubs, distilleries, tasting rooms, which have different series liquor licenses, remained open. They argued that Ducey’s restrictions constituted an unconstitutional delegation of authority; exceeded statutory rulemaking authority granted by Arizona law; arbitrarily discriminated against plaintiffs and deprive them of their property, in violation of the state constitution; and violated the Equal Protection and Takings Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. Citing the "unrelenting spread of the novel coronavirus," Gates found that "the public interest is overwhelmingly in favor of the continuation of" Ducey’s orders. Gates ruled that there is "no inherent right in a citizen to ... sell intoxicating liquors by retail," and further, the governor's restrictions "are rationally related to expert data and guidance on minimizing the spread of COVID-19." Attorney Ilan Wurman, representing the bar owners, acknowledged the likelihood of failure on the merits, saying he hoped to "get a summary judgment ruling quickly and just move on to the appeal."[6][7]

See also


External links

Footnotes