Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Patricia G. Parrish

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the official's last term in office covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Patricia G. Parrish
Image of Patricia G. Parrish
Prior offices
Oklahoma Judicial District 7

Education

Bachelor's

Oklahoma State University, 1979

Law

University of Oklahoma, 1982


Patricia G. Parrish is a former Oklahoma district judge for Oklahoma County, which is located in District Seven.[1] She first joined the court in 2003 and did not seek re-election in 2018.[2]

Elections

2014

See also: Oklahoma judicial elections, 2014
Parrish ran for re-election to the 7th District Court.
As an unopposed candidate, she was automatically re-elected without appearing on the ballot. [3] 

2010

Parrish was re-elected to the district court after running unopposed.[4]

Main article: Oklahoma judicial elections, 2010

Education

Parrish received a B.A. in political science from Oklahoma State University in 1979. In 1982, she earned a J.D. from the University of Oklahoma.[2]

Career

Prior to her judicial appointment, Parrish worked in private practice.[2]

Awards and associations

Awards

  • 2011: Mona Salyer Lambird Spotlight Award, Oklahoma Bar Association
  • 2009: Judge of the Year Award, Oklahoma Association for Justice
  • 2007: Journal Record Leadership in Law Award
  • 2006: Hennessey High School Hall of Fame

Associations

  • Member, Oklahoma Trial Judges Association
  • Member, Oklahoma County Bar Association’s Voices for Children Committee
  • Master, William J. Holloway Jr., American Inn of Court[5]

Noteworthy cases

Judge rules Oklahoma's execution law unconstitutional (2014)

Judge Parrish ruled against Oklahoma's execution law on March 26, 2014, declaring it to be unconstitutional for its strict privacy provision. Under the law, no one is able to disclose the source of the drugs used in the lethal injections. This became an issue when inmates Clayton Lockett and Charles Warner, who were scheduled to be executed in April 2014, inquired about the purity of the drugs that were to be used to kill them.

Judge Parrish stated:

I think that the secrecy statute is a violation of due process because access to the courts has been denied.[6][7]

Assistant Attorney General Seth Branham argued, "What is the point of having the information if there's nothing you can do with it?"[6] Lockett and Warner, however, have said that they are afraid that if the drugs are impure, they may suffer more painful deaths. Their fears may have spawned from Michael Wilson's final words when he was executed by a three-drug injection in January of 2014. He said, "I feel my whole body burning."[6]

Lockett was executed on April 29, 2014, but died of a heart attack rather than the injection because the chemicals did not properly enter Lockett's veins. Warner's execution was then postponed for 180 days due to Lockett's problematic death.[8][9]

See also

External links

Footnotes