Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Patricia Kienholz

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Patricia Kienholz
Image of Patricia Kienholz

Education

Bachelor's

University of Southern California

Personal
Profession
Nonprofit professional
Contact

Patricia Kienholz was a candidate for the Position 4 seat on the Spokane Board of Directors in Washington. She ran in the general election on November 3, 2015. Patricia Kienholz lost the general election on November 3, 2015.

Kienholz participated in Ballotpedia's 2015 survey of school board candidates. Her responses can be read here.

Biography

Email editor@ballotpedia.org to notify us of updates to this biography.

Kienholz is a nonprofit professional and community volunteer. She graduated from the University of Southern California with two bachelor's degrees: the first in gender studies and the second in journalism. She also has post-secondary education in advanced chemistry. She previously worked as a marketing professional for the National Football League in Los Angeles, Calif. She is a single parent to two children.[1]

Elections

2015

See also: Spokane Public Schools elections (2015)

One of the five seats on the Spokane Board of Directors was up for primary election on August 4, 2015. Incumbent Rocky Treppiedi and Jerrall Haynes defeated Donald Dover and advanced to the general election on November 3, 2015. Haynes then defeated Treppiedi in the general election. The Position 4 seat also joined the ballot in November, since only two candidates filed for the seat. Candidates Paul Schneider and Patricia Kienholz went head-to-head for the open seat, and Schneider won the election. Incumbent Jeffrey Bierman did not file for re-election.

Results

Spokane Public Schools Board of Directors, Position 4 General Election, 6-year term, 2015
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Paul Schneider 54.5% 24,532
Patricia Kienholz 44.5% 20,045
Write-in votes 0.98% 440
Total Votes 45,017
Source: Spokane County, Washington, "Election Results: 11/03/2015-General Election," November 24, 2015


Funding

Kienholz reported $910.00 in contributions and $278.40 in expenditures to the Washington Public Disclosure Commission, which left her campaign with $631.60 on hand as of August 4, 2015.[2]

Endorsements

Kienholz received endorsements from the following:[1]

  • Spokane County GOP
  • Dr. George J. Peterson, founding dean, Eugene T. Moore School of Education, Clemson University
  • Gary Pollard, chair, City of Spokane Riverside Neighborhood Council
  • Alexander Roberts, coordinator for student standards, University of Idaho
  • Sheriff Ozzie D. Knezovich, Spokane County Sheriff's Office

Of the Spokane County GOP endorsement, Kienholz stated the following on her campaign's Facebook page:

I appreciate my recent endorsement from the Spokane County GOP. But, I am also strongly opposed to the politicizing of nonpartisan elections. Thanks Spokane GOP for supporting my candidacy. I promise to do my best when considering the interests of your voters, ALL those affected directly or indirectly by Spokane Public Schools, and especially those impacted most by education funding--students who aren't able to vote for outcomes involving their futures.[3]
—Patricia Kienholz, (2015)

[1]

Campaign themes

2015

Ballotpedia survey responses

Candidate Connection Logo - stacked.png

Kienholz participated in Ballotpedia's 2015 survey of school board candidates. The following sections display her responses to the survey questions. When asked what her top priority would be if elected, the candidate made the following statement:

My top priorities are: (1) closing the remedial course gap for students entering college required to take college-offered remedial courses in mathematics and English; (2) improving and providing for special education, STEM, arts integration, English as a second language, and underserved students; (3) school safety; (4) workforce development.[3]
—Patricia Kienholz (2015)[4]
Ranking the issues

The candidate was asked to rank the following issues by importance in the school district, with 1 being the most important and 7 being the least important. This table displays this candidate's rankings from most to least important:

Education policy
Education Policy Logo on Ballotpedia.png

Click here to learn more about education policy in Washington.
Education on the ballot
Issue importance ranking
Candidate's ranking Issue
1
Closing the achievement gap
2
Improving education for special needs students
3
Improving college readiness
4
Balancing or maintaining the district's budget
5
Expanding career-technical education
6
Expanding arts education
7
Expanding school choice options
Positions on the issues

The candidate was asked to answer 10 questions from Ballotpedia regarding significant issues in education and the school district. The questions are in the left column and the candidate's responses are in the right column of the following table:

Question Response
What is your stance on implementing Common Core standards?
"Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are a controversial federally adopted set of guidelines required for states to receive federal funds. In Washington State, those funds total almost a billion dollars. CCSS were formally adopted by the state of Washington in 2010, and fully incorporated for Math and English Language Arts in the 2014-15 school year. Opponents of the standards oppose them for different reasons. The arguments usually fall into 5 camps: (1) those that do not want teacher pay tied to assessments of student performance; (2) those that object to the use of “Integrated Math”; (3) those that object to English reading curriculum adopted under CCSS; (4) those that object to math and English testing applied to students with disabilities, students for whom English is a second language, and underserved students who are harmed by the tests; and (5) those who feel students are tested too frequently and with too much rigor. School board members in Washington State do not have the option of not implementing the CCSS as state law mandates them. (see http://www.k12.wa.us/CurriculumInstruct/CCSS/default.aspx)"
Should your district approve the creation of new charter schools?
"Yes. Presently, Spokane Public Schools is the only district authorizer of Charter Schools in the State of Washington. We have two charter schools in Spokane: PRIDE Prep Charter School (opening 2015-16 school year); and Spokane International Academy (opening 2015-16 school year). (see http://www.sbe.wa.gov/charters.php#.VbpcJJNVhBd)"
Should the state give money to private schools through a voucher system?
"Yes."
Are standardized tests an accurate metric of student achievement?
"Standardized tests can underestimate academic achievement of test takers, especially for underserved students and students with disabilities. While standardized tests don't improve student performance they are necessary for providing benchmarks to regulatory agencies seeking to improve the quality of education for our students. The real question is not whether or not standardized tests are 'an accurate metric of student achievement' but rather, is the usage of standardized testing problematic for students, are standardized tests fair and unbiased for ALL students, and especially for underserved students, students with disabilities, and for students for whom English is a second language? Standardized tests are just one of the many available measurements of student achievement, and should be used as mile-markers and not stop signs."
How can the district ensure equal opportunities for high and low achieving students?
"Equal access to education in k-12 is a Constitutional right. There are many ways policies and procedures can be used by districts to help improve equal opportunities for ALL students. In the past, the education sector implemented inclusion policies to reach students with disabilities. These policies resulted in an increase in inclusion without increasing graduation rates for those students. And, sometimes implementing policies that are untested results in less than desirable outcomes. Paying attention to detail and using data analytics is requisite for our policy process to be effective.


In my opinion, one valuable way to ensure equal opportunity for students is to identify student needs early on. Communication and cooperation with parents and families is the most important way to identify areas in student achievement lending to a student receiving an education that doesn't meet their needs.

A second valuable way to ensure equal opportunities for ALL students, and especially low achieving students, is to continue the emphasis on speech pathologists who identify communication difficulties in children. These difficulties keep students locked in an education bubble that separates them from other students, stalls their progress, and often results in a mis-diagnosing of behavioral disorders. Speech and communication professionals are not as available as other professionals hired by districts, so the continued effort to facilitate access to speech professionals is important.

Improving special education policies, incorporating STEM, approving policies and procedures for high achieving students, receiving input from parents, teachers and other professionals in the design of programming that can be used district-wide but has the flexibility to tailor to a specific school(s), and consistently engaging students for feedback about what works and what doesn't, are the best common sense approaches to ensuring equal opportunities for high and low achieving students."

How should expulsion be used in the district?
"District policy should include the provision that expulsion cases will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the board; should be used only for serious offenses; and should be a last resort. Expulsion cases should include parent/family input on behalf of students, and should not prevent parents from being included in communications involving their student except in cases where the parent/family representative is not legally permitted to have access to such communications or permitted contact with the student."
If a school is failing in your district, what steps should the school board take to help the students in that school?
"The board should be consistent with state law, should not interfere in the day-to-day operations of the schools they serve, and should have effective policies and procedures, including performance evaluation, peer review, and a solutions strategy that addresses failing schools in the district."
Do you support merit pay for teachers?
"Merit pay, while supported by many teachers and education experts, has not been shown to improve the quality of education for, or performance of students. Rewarding teachers for doing what they are supposed to do, doesn't seem to make sense to me. Additionally, supplemental spending can be provided for teachers actively involved in activities closing the achievement gap, STEM education, and arts integration. I think it's a better idea to incentivize ingenuity by providing supplemental funding to teachers who are going 'above-and-beyond' the standard."
How should the district handle underperforming teachers?
"Our collective bargaining agreement includes a yearly performance evaluation for teachers. Underperforming teachers should be offered every available resource the district can provide (mentorship, additional training, peer review) to improve performance. Consistently underperforming teachers should work in another field."
How would you work to improve community-school board relations?
"I work to improve community-school board relations by encouraging our community to attend board meetings, by communicating through social media and email, and being available by telephone and in person. I have a presence in the community and work well within the nonprofit, government and private sectors involved in education. As a school board member I'll make myself available to schools, students and parents, helping them understand where our school district is headed, and answer to why our school board takes action. Through transparency and accountability school boards can improve the quality of education for All students."

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms "Patricia Kienholz" "Spokane Public Schools". These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Facebook, "Patricia Kienholz For School Board Position 4 - Spokane Public Schools," accessed July 30, 2015
  2. Washington Public Disclosure Commission, "Local Candidates," accessed August 4, 2015
  3. 3.0 3.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  4. Ballotpedia School Board Candidate Survey, 2015, "Patricia Kienholz's responses," July 30, 2015