Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Paula Nakayama

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Paula Nakayama
Image of Paula Nakayama
Prior offices
Hawaii Supreme Court

Education

Bachelor's

University of California, Davis

Law

Hastings College of Law


Paula Nakayama was a judge of the Hawaii Supreme Court. She assumed office on April 22, 1993. She left office on April 21, 2023.

She first became a member of the court by appointment. Nakayama was appointed on April 22, 1993, by Gov. John D. Waihee III (D).[1]

Nakayama retired on April 21, 2023 due to reaching Hawaii's mandatory retirement age. To learn more about this vacancy, click here.

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country. As part of this study, we assigned each justice a Confidence Score describing our confidence in the degree of partisanship exhibited by the justices' past partisan behavior, before they joined the court.[2] Nakayama received a confidence score of Mild Democrat.[3] Click here to read more about this study.

Biography

Nakayama earned her undergraduate degree from the University of California at Davis and her J.D. from Hastings College of Law.[1]

Nakayama was admitted to the Hawaii Bar in 1979. She was deputy prosecuting attorney for the City & County of Honolulu. Nakayama was then a partner at Shim, Tam and Kirimitsu. In 1992, she was appointed to serve as a judge on the O`ahu First Circuit Court. The following year, she was appointed to the state supreme court.[1]

Appointments

2013

Nakayama was reappointed to the Hawaii Supreme Court.[4]

Analysis

Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship (2020)

See also: Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship and Ballotpedia Courts: Determiners and Dissenters

Last updated: June 15, 2020

In 2020, Ballotpedia published Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship, a study examining the partisan affiliation of all state supreme court justices in the country as of June 15, 2020.

The study presented Confidence Scores that represented our confidence in each justice's degree of partisan affiliation. This was not a measure of where a justice fell on an ideological spectrum, but rather a measure of how much confidence we had that a justice was or had been affiliated with a political party. The scores were based on seven factors, including but not limited to party registration.[5]

The five resulting categories of Confidence Scores were:

  • Strong Democrat
  • Mild Democrat
  • Indeterminate[6]
  • Mild Republican
  • Strong Republican

This justice's Confidence Score, as well as the factors contributing to that score, is presented below. The information below was current as of June 2020.

Paula
Nakayama

Hawaii

  • Partisan Confidence Score:
    Mild Democrat
  • Judicial Selection Method:
    Assisted appointment through governor controlled judicial nominating commission
  • Key Factors:
    • Appointed by a Democratic governor
    • State was a Democratic trifecta at time of appointment


Partisan Profile

Details:

Nakayama was appointed by Gov. John D. Waihee III (D) while Hawaii was a Democratic trifecta.

Other Scores:

In a 2012 study of campaign contributions, Nakayama received a campaign finance score of 0.23, indicating a conservative ideological leaning.


Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores (2012)

See also: Bonica and Woodruff campaign finance scores of state supreme court justices, 2012

In October 2012, political science professors Adam Bonica and Michael Woodruff of Stanford University attempted to determine the partisan ideology of state supreme court justices. They created a scoring system in which a score above 0 indicated a more conservative-leaning ideology, while scores below 0 were more liberal.

Nakayama received a campaign finance score of 0.23, indicating a conservative ideological leaning. This was more conservative than the average score of -0.29 that justices received in Hawaii.

The study was based on data from campaign contributions by the judges themselves, the partisan leaning of those who contributed to the judges' campaigns, or, in the absence of elections, the ideology of the appointing body (governor or legislature). This study was not a definitive label of a justice, but an academic summary of various relevant factors.[7]

State supreme court judicial selection in Hawaii

See also: Judicial selection in Hawaii


The five justices of the Hawaii Supreme Court are selected through the assisted appointment method. The Hawaii Judicial Selection Commission is responsible for screening candidates and submitting a shortlist to the governor. The commission is made up of nine members: two appointed by the governor, two appointed by the state Senate president, two appointed by the state House speaker, two appointed by the Hawaii Bar Association, and one appointed by the chief justice of the supreme court. The governor must appoint a judge from the commission's shortlist and the appointee must then be confirmed by the Hawaii State Senate.[8]

Justices serve for 10 years after their appointment. To continue to serve on the court, they must receive a majority vote of the selection commission.[8]

Qualifications

To serve on this court, a judge must be:[8]

  • a U.S. resident and citizen;
  • a resident and citizen of the state;
  • a practicing attorney in the state for at least ten years; and
  • under the age of 70 (retirement by 70 is mandatory retirement).

Chief justice

In Hawaii, the position of chief justice is a specific seat on the court (similar to the Supreme Court of the United States) rather than a peer-selected leadership position. The chief justice is appointed in the same manner as the other justices on the court.[8]

Vacancies

See also: How vacancies are filled in state supreme courts

If a midterm vacancy occurs, the position is filled just as it would be if the vacancy occurred at the end of a justice's term. The governor appoints a successor from a list provided by a nominating commission, and the appointee faces confirmation from the state Senate. Newly appointed justices serve full 10-year terms.[8]

The map below highlights how vacancies are filled in state supreme courts across the country.



See also

Hawaii Judicial Selection More Courts
Seal of Hawaii.png
Judicialselectionlogo.png
BP logo.png
Courts in Hawaii
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Hawaii Supreme Court
Elections: 202520242023202220212020201920182017
Gubernatorial appointments
Judicial selection in Hawaii
Federal courts
State courts
Local courts

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Hawai'i State Judiciary, "University of California Hastings College of the Law," accessed June 28, 2021
  2. We calculated confidence scores by collecting several data points such as party registration, donations, and previous political campaigns.
  3. The five possible confidence scores were: Strong Democrat, Mild Democrat, Indeterminate, Mild Republican, and Strong Republican.
  4. Hawaii State Judiciary, "Judicial Selection Commission, State of Hawaiʻi, NOTICE OF PETITION FOR RETENTION, THE HONORABLE PAULA A. NAKAYAMA," October 26, 2012
  5. The seven factors were party registration, donations made to partisan candidates, donations made to political parties, donations received from political parties or bodies with clear political affiliation, participation in political campaigns, the partisanship of the body responsible for appointing the justice, and state trifecta status when the justice joined the court.
  6. An Indeterminate score indicates that there is either not enough information about the justice’s partisan affiliations or that our research found conflicting partisan affiliations.
  7. Stanford University, "State Supreme Court Ideology and 'New Style' Judicial Campaigns," October 31, 2012
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 Hawai'i State Judiciary, "Overview of the Hawai`i Judicial System," accessed April 18, 2025