Public policy in Massachusetts
This article does not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
The Public Policy Project on Ballotpedia aims to illuminate major policy issues being discussed and implemented throughout the United States. Public policy can be complicated and controversial; deciding what works best and how to allocate resources to achieve a policy goal can involve multiple trade-offs. Much of the public policy that affects citizens economically, legally and socially, is made at the state level. Below you will find links and introductions to all the Massachusetts public policy articles on Ballotpedia. To see the policy overview of another state click on the map below.
- For a list of all public policy articles on Ballotpedia see here.
Budget Policy
Budget and finances
In Massachusetts, as in other states, lawmakers and public officials are elected in part to manage the state's finances. This includes generating revenues (money coming into the state from various sources) and approving expenditures (the money spent on governmental functions and servicing state debt). State budgets are complex and fluid, as they depend on anticipated revenues and planned expenditures, which may alter over the course of a fiscal year. If revenues do not keep pace with expenditures, states generally have to raise taxes, cut services, borrow money, or a combination of the three. State budget decisions are also influenced by policy decisions at the national level, such as the Affordable Care Act or energy and environmental regulations, and issues at the local level, such as crime and the quality of education.
Taxes
Massachusetts generates the bulk of its tax revenue by levying a personal income tax and a sales tax. The state derives its constitutional authority to tax from Article IV, Chapter 1 of the state constitution.[2][3]
Tax policy can vary from state to state. States levy taxes to help fund the variety of services provided by state governments. Tax collections comprise approximately 40 percent of the states' total revenues. The rest comes from non-tax sources, such as intergovernmental aid (e.g., federal funds), lottery revenues and fees. The primary types of taxes levied by state governments include personal income tax, general sales tax, excise (or special sales) taxes and corporate income tax.[4]
Civil Liberties Policy
Affirmative action
Affirmative action in Massachusetts refers to the steps taken by employers and universities in Massachusetts to increase the proportions of historically disadvantaged minority groups at those institutions. Historically, affirmative action nationwide has taken many different forms, such as strict quotas, extra outreach efforts, and racial and gender preferences. However, racial quotas in university admissions were banned in a 1978 United States Supreme Court case, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke.[5]
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court reversed lower court decisions in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, effectively ending the use of affirmative action in college admissions.
As of March 2015, 109 out of 577 public four-year universities across the country reported that they considered race in admissions. This practice has been banned in eight states. Meanwhile, 28 states require affirmative action plans in either public employment or apprenticeships. Affirmative action programs that grant racial preferences have come under scrutiny in the courts for potentially violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.[6][7]
The following information details the use of affirmative action in universities and employment in Massachusetts, as well as notable court cases originating in the state.
The effects of affirmative action policies are contested. Proponents argue that affirmative action diversifies selective institutions and provides more opportunities to minorities. Opponents argue that implementing policies that favor some groups requires discrimination against others and that these policiesmay harm individuals they are meant to help.
Campaign finance
Campaign finance requirements govern how much money candidates and campaigns may receive from individuals and organizations, how they must report those contributions, and how much individuals, organizations, and political parties may contribute to campaigns. In addition to direct campaign contributions, campaign finance laws also apply to third-party organizations and nonprofit organizations that seek to influence elections through independent expenditures or issue advocacy.
This page provides background on campaign finance regulation, lists contribution limits to state candidates and ballot measures in Massachusetts, compares contribution limits to gubernatorial and state legislative candidates in Massachusetts with those from other states, and details the candidate reporting requirements in Massachusetts.
The information on this page pertains to candidates for state office and state ballot measures. Candidates for federal office are subject to federal campaign finance law. Candidates for local office are subject to all applicable state laws as well as any separate local campaign finance regulations.[8]
Background
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the independent regulatory agency that administers and enforces federal campaign election laws. The FEC is responsible for disclosing campaign finance information, enforcing limits and prohibitions on contributions and overseeing public funding of presidential elections.[9] According to the FEC, an individual becomes a federal candidate and must begin reporting campaign finances once he or she has either raised or spent $5,000 in his or her campaign. Within fifteen days of this benchmark, the candidate must register with the FEC and designate an official campaign committee, which is responsible for the funds and expenditures of the campaign. This committee must have an official treasurer and cannot support any candidate but the one who registered it. Detailed financial reports are then made to the FEC every financial quarter after the individual is registered. Reports are also made before primaries and before the general election.[10]
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued a number of rulings pertaining to federal election campaign finance regulations. In the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, the court held that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited. The court's decision also overturned the ban on for-profit and not-for-profit corporations and unions broadcasting electioneering communications in the 30 days before a presidential primary and in the 60 days before a general election.[11] In the SpeechNOW.org v. Federal Election Commission decision, the first application of the Citizens United decision, the court held that contribution limits on what individuals could give to independent expenditure-only groups, and the amount these organizations could receive, were unconstitutional. Contribution limits on donations directly to candidates, however, remained unchanged.[12][13] In 2014's McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission decision, the court overturned biennial aggregate campaign contribution limits, and held that individuals may contribute to as many federal candidates as they want, but may only contribute up to the federal limit in each case.[14]
While the FEC governs federal election campaigns and contribution limits, individual states require their own level of regulation and reporting. The amount of regulation required differs by state, as do the limits on campaign contributions and third-party activities to influence elections. Candidates for local office must follow any applicable state and local campaign finance regulations.
Contribution limits
The table below details contribution limits as they applied to various types of individuals and groups in Massachusetts as of July 2025. The uppermost row of the table indicates the contributor, while the leftmost column indicates the recipient.[15]
| Individuals | Single candidates committees | PACs | People's committee | Political party | Super PACs | Corporations | Unions | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statewide candidate (incl. Governor) | $1,000 | $100 | $500 | $500 | $3,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Senate | $1,000 | $100 | $500 | $500 | $3,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| House | $1,000 | $100 | $500 | $500 | $3,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| PAC | $500 | Unlimited | $500 | $500 | $500 | $0 | $0 | $500 | |
| Party committees | $5,000 | Unlimited | $5,000 | $5,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| People's committee | $210 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| Ballot measures | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited | |
| Limits apply per year. | |||||||||
| Source: Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance, "Annual Campaign Contribution Limits," accessed July 29, 2025 | |||||||||
State comparisons in the 2024 elections
Candidate reporting requirements
See statutes: Massachusetts General Laws, Part I, Title VIII, Chapter 55
A candidate is considered a "depository candidates" because he or she is required by law to designate a financial institution in Massachusetts as a depository for all campaign funds. All receipts must be deposited into this account and all expenditures must be made from it (this includes the candidate's personal funds). In order to designate a financial depository, a candidate and/or committee treasurer must file a CPF D 103 (Appointment of Depository Bank) form. Even a candidate who does not plan to open a bank account because he or she only intends to spend his or her own money must designate a bank by filing this form. The financial institution submits regular reports of all contributions and expenditures to the Office of Campaign and Political Finance using information provided to the bank by the campaign. [17][18][19]
A candidate is not usually legally required to form a committee (public employees who run for elective office must form committees). If the candidate does choose to organize a political committee for campaign purposes, he or she must file a Statement of Organization of a Candidate Committee. A committee can neither accept contributions nor make expenditures until this form is filed. A committee must name a chairman and a treasurer. The same person can often fulfill both of these roles, though a candidate cannot serve as his or her own treasurer and a public employee seeking elective office cannot serve as his or her own treasurer.[19]
A candidate and/or committee treasurer must file an initial campaign finance report (Form CPF D 102) within three business days after designating a depository institution. This report is intended to disclose any activity that may have occurred before the designation of the bank, complete through the date of the bank's designation. A Form CPF D 102 is also used to reveal any outstanding liabilities, in-kind contributions, or savings account information. This form, filed once per year, provides the only disclosure of the candidate's in-kind contributions, liabilities, and savings account information.[17][19]
All contributions must be deposited in the designated institution no later than the end of the seventh day after receipt. In conjunction with the deposit record, the candidate must also electronically file contributor information directly with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance (one deposit = one deposit report). This may be done by entering the information directly onto OCPF’s database using an online reporting program. When entering contributor information for e-filing, the name and residential address of the contributor must be included for any receipt in excess of $50. Contributions of $50 or less may be combined in one total. However, any contributor of $50 or less must be itemized if the aggregate of his or her contributions for the calendar year has exceeded $50. At the end of each reporting period, the depository bank electronically files with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance information on each expenditure that cleared the depository account during the period. Financial institutions must submit reports by the 5th of each month for all depository candidates, excluding state senate or house of representatives.[17][19]
A candidate or a treasurer of a candidate's committee for nomination or election to the state senate or house of representatives files reports according to the following schedule.[17][20]
In each odd-numbered year:
- January 20, complete as to December 31 of the previous year
- April 20, complete as to March 31; July 20, complete as to June 30
- October 20, complete as to September 30
In each even-numbered year:
- January 20, complete as to December 31 of the previous year
- April 20, complete as to March 31
- July 20, complete as to June 30
- The eighth day preceding a primary
- The eighth day preceding a biennial state election
Campaigns that receive and deposit contributions of $500 or more after the 18th day but more than 72 hours before an election must disclose those contributions electronically to the Office of Campaign and Political Finance within 72 hours of deposit. All campaign payments in excess of $100 must be made to a named payee by a check or debit card drawn on the candidate’s or committee’s depository account. A check payable to a candidate or treasurer as reimbursement for expenditures may not exceed $100.[17][19]
A candidate or committee that has no cash balance, assets, or outstanding liabilities and wishes to dissolve can do so by filing an application for dissolution. A candidate or committee must continue to report on a regular basis until an application for dissolution is filed. Remaining funds from committee or candidate accounts must be donated to any of the following:[19]
- the state's General Fund
- the general fund of a city or town
- a scholarship fund
- a charitable or religious organization
Campaign finance legislation
The table below displays bills related to campaign finance introduced during or carried over to Massachusetts' current legislative session.[21]
Election and campaign ballot measures
Ballotpedia has tracked 4 statewide ballot measures relating to elections and campaigns.
- Massachusetts Question 2, Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative (2020)
- Massachusetts Question 17, Biennial Elections for State Officers and Legislators Amendment (1918)
- Massachusetts Question 2, Allow Women to Hold Public Office Amendment (1924)
- Massachusetts Question 2, Party Candidate Nominating Conventions Initiative (1932)
Contact information
Election agencies
- See also: State election agencies
Individuals seeking additional information about election administration in Massachusetts can contact the following local, state, and federal agencies.
Massachusetts Town Clerks
Secretary of the Commonwealth, Elections Division
- 1 Ashburton Place, Room 1705
- Boston, Massachusetts 02108
- Phone: 617-727-2828
- Toll free: 1-800-462-8683
- Fax: 617-742-3238
- Email: elections@sec.state.ma.us
- Website: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/
State Ethics Commission
- 1 Ashburton Place, Room 619
- Boston, Massachusetts 02108
- Phone: 617-371-9500
- Fax: 617-723-5851
- Website: https://www.mass.gov/orgs/state-ethics-commission
U.S. Election Assistance Commission
- 633 3rd Street NW, Suite 200
- Washington, DC 20001
- Phone: 301-563-3919
- Toll free: 1-866-747-1471
- Email: clearinghouse@eac.gov
- Website: https://www.eac.gov
Federal Election Commission (FEC)
- 1050 First Street, NE
- Washington, DC 20463
- Telephone: (202)-694-1100
- Toll-free: 1-800-424-9530
- Email: info@fec.gov
- Website: http://www.fec.gov/
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Massachusetts campaign finance. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.
See also
- Campaign finance regulation
- Ballot access requirements for political candidates in Massachusetts
- Massachusetts
Footnotes
- ↑ National Association of State Budget Officers, "State Expenditure Report (Fiscal 2014-2016)," accessed June 26, 2017
- ↑ General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, "Constitution of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts," accessed October 17, 2014
- ↑ Tax Policy Center, "State Tax Collection Shares by Type 2000-2013," June 20, 2014
- ↑ Brunori, D. (2011). State Tax Policy: A Political Perspective. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press
- ↑ Oyez, "Regents of the University of California v. Bakke," accessed February 11, 2015
- ↑ Miller Center of Public Affairs, "Affirmative Action: Race or Class?" accessed February 10, 2015
- ↑ Business and Legal Resources, "Affirmative Action," accessed March 31, 2015
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "Campaign Finance Enforcement," accessed May 28, 2025
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "About the FEC," accessed June 27, 2012
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Candidate Registration Brochure," accessed December 7, 2012
- ↑ New York Times, "Justices, 5-4, Reject Corporate Spending Limit," January 21, 2010
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Speechnow.org v. FEC," April 7, 2014
- ↑ OpenSecrets, "Two Federal Court Rulings Could Change Campaign Finance Landscape," March 26, 2010
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "Ongoing Litigation," accessed March 18, 2015
- ↑ Vox, "Super PACs can spend unlimited amounts on elections, but must disclose their donors," accessed July 27, 2015
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "State Limits on Contributions to Candidates 2023-2024 Election Cycle," accessed May 8, 2025
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance, "Campaign Finance Guide," accessed July 29, 2025
- ↑ Massachusetts General Laws, "Part I, Title VIII, Chapter 55, Section 19," accessed July 29, 2025
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 [https://www.ocpf.us/PublicSearch/ViewDocument?id=3772 GUIDE-48 Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance, "Campaign Finance Guide for Depository Candidates and State Party Committees," accessed July 30, 2025]
- ↑ Massachusetts General Laws, " Part I, Title VIII, Chapter 55," accessed July 29, 2025
- ↑ Bills are organized by most recent action. Clicking on a bill will open its page on Ballotpedia's Election Administration Legislation Tracker, which includes bill details and a summary.
Nonprofit regulation
Nonprofit regulation in Massachusetts involves a complex set of rules that govern nonprofit organizations and charitable giving throughout the state. Major issues surrounding nonprofit regulation nationwide include the following:
- contribution limits,
- donor disclosure, and
- the redefinition of issue advocacy.
Massachusetts is one of 39 states that require charitable organizations, and those intending to solicit on their behalf, to register with the state in order to solicit contributions, whether they are a Massachusetts organization or based out-of-state. In Massachusetts a number of groups and organizations are exempt from registration.[1]
Massachusetts is one of 32 states that allows registrants to use either the Unified Registration Statement (URS) or the state registration form. Organizations based in Massachusetts, however, must use the state form.[2] Only seven states requiring registration do not accept the URS.
Education Policy
Charter schools • Higher education • Public education • School choice |
K-12 Public education
The Massachusetts public school system (prekindergarten through grade 12) operates within districts governed by locally elected school boards and superintendents. In 2022, Massachusetts had 896,103 students enrolled in a total of 1,751 schools in 316 school districts. There were 70,653 teachers in the public schools, or roughly one teacher for every 13 students, compared to the national average of 1:16. In 2020, Massachusetts spent on average $18,733 per pupil.[5] The state's graduation rate was 88 percent in the 2018-2019 school year.[6]
Higher education
Massachusetts' higher education system is composed of 125 colleges and universities. Of these, 30 are public institutions, 85 are nonprofit private schools, and 10 are for-profit private institutions.[7]
School choice
School choice is a term that refers to programs offering alternatives to assigned local public school options. Public school choice options include open enrollment policies, magnet schools, and charter schools. Other options include school vouchers, scholarship tax credits, and education savings accounts (ESAs).[8][9]
Proponents argue that school choice programs improve educational outcomes by expanding opportunity and access for historically disadvantaged students. In addition, advocates claim that school choice programs empower parents and improve traditional public schools through competition. Critics contend that these programs divert funds from traditional public schools, thereby generating unequal outcomes for students. In addition, some critics argue that school voucher programs wrongly direct tax dollars to religious organizations, which operate many private schools.
Charter schools
Charter schools in Massachusetts are public schools operated independently of public school systems. Although they are largely publicly funded, charter schools are exempt from many of the requirements imposed by state and local boards of education regarding hiring and curriculum. As public schools, charter schools cannot charge tuition or impose special entrance requirements; students are usually admitted through a lottery process if demand exceeds the number of spaces available in a school. Charter schools generally receive a percentage of the per-pupil funds from the state and local school districts for operational costs based on enrollment. In most states, charter schools do not receive funds for facilities or start-up costs; therefore, they must rely to some extent on private donations. The federal government also provides revenues through special grants. As of March 2017, 44 states and the District of Columbia had approved legislation authorizing the creation of public charter schools. Six states had not.
Election Policy
Ballot access requirements
In order to get on the ballot in Massachusetts, a candidate for state or federal office must meet a variety of state-specific filing requirements and deadlines. These regulations, known as ballot access laws, determine whether a candidate or party will appear on an election ballot. These laws are set at the state level. A candidate must prepare to meet ballot access requirements well in advance of primaries, caucuses, and the general election.
There are three basic methods by which an individual may become a candidate for office in a state.
- An individual can seek the nomination of a state-recognized political party.
- An individual can run as an independent. Independent candidates often must petition in order to have their names printed on the general election ballot.
- An individual can run as a write-in candidate.
This article outlines the steps that prospective candidates for state-level and congressional office must take in order to run for office in Massachusetts. For information about filing requirements for presidential candidates, click here. Information about filing requirements for local-level offices is not available in this article (contact state election agencies for information about local candidate filing processes).
Redistricting
Redistricting is the process by which new congressional and state legislative district boundaries are drawn. Each of Massachusetts' nine United States Representatives and 200 state legislators are elected from political divisions called districts. United States Senators are not elected by districts, but by the states at large. District lines are redrawn every 10 years following completion of the United States census. The federal government stipulates that districts must have nearly equal populations and must not discriminate on the basis of race or ethnicity.[10][11][12][13]
Massachusetts was apportioned nine seats in the U.S. House of Representatives after the 2020 census, the same number it received after the 2010 census. Click here for more information about redistricting in Massachusetts after the 2020 census.
Voting
|
|
 |
| Select a state from the menu below to learn more about its voting policies. |
The policies governing voter participation are enacted and enforced primarily at the state level. These policies, which include voter identification requirements, early voting provisions, online voter registration systems, and more, dictate the conditions under which people cast their ballots in their respective states.
This article includes the following information about voting policies in Massachusetts:
- Voter registration details, including deadlines and eligibility requirements.
- In-person voting details, including identification requirements, poll times, and early voting provisions.
- Absentee/mail-in voting deadlines and rules.
- Details about voting rules for people convicted of a felony.
- Contact information for election agencies.
Click here for more information about election administration in the state, including voter list maintenance policies, provisional ballot rules, post-election auditing practices, and additional election policy context.
For information on elections happening this year, click here.
Do you have questions about your elections? Looking for information about your local election official? Click here to use U.S. Vote Foundation’s election official lookup tool.
Energy Policy
Energy information
Energy policy involves governmental actions affecting the production, distribution, and consumption of energy in a state. Energy policies are enacted and enforced at the local, state, and federal levels and may change over time. These policies include legislation, regulation, taxes, incentives for energy production or use, standards for energy efficiency, and more. Stakeholders include citizens, politicians, environmental groups, industry groups, and think tanks. A variety of factors can affect the feasibility of federal and state-level energy policies, such as available natural resources, geography, and consumer needs.
Fracking
| Read about Massachusetts' state energy profile » |
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Massachusetts had no oil or natural gas reserves as of May 2017; thus, no fracking occurred in the state.[14]
Environmental Policy
Environmental information
Environmental policy aims to conserve natural resources by balancing environmental protection with economic growth, property rights, public health, and energy production. Federal, state, and local government entities develop and implement environmental policies through laws and regulations. This page features information about environmental policy in Massachusetts.
Endangered species
Endangered species policy in Massachusetts involves the identification and protection of endangered and threatened animal and plant species. Policies are implemented and enforced by both the state and federal governments.
Finance Policy
Financial regulation information
The United States financial system is a network that facilitates exchanges between lenders and borrowers. The system, which includes banks and investment firms, is the base for all economic activity in the nation. According to the Federal Reserve, financial regulation has two main intended purposes: to ensure the safety and soundness of the financial system and to provide and enforce rules that aim to protect consumers. The regulatory framework varies across industries, with different regulations applying to different financial services.[15]
Individual federal and state entities have different and sometimes overlapping responsibilities within the regulatory system. For example, individual states and three federal agencies—the Federal Reserve, the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)—regulate commercial banks. Other sectors of the financial market are regulated by specific entities.[16][17]
Some, such as the Brookings Institution, argue that expanded governmental regulation of banks and financial products (e.g., mortgages) can prevent large-scale financial crises, protect consumers from abusive practices, and stabilize financial markets. Others, such as the Cato Institute, argue that over-regulation of banks of banks and financial products burdens business, stalls economic growth, and does little, if anything, to stabilize financial markets. Beyond this basic debate about the role of the government in regulating the private financial sector, there are varying opinions about the proper extent of governmental regulation.[18][19]
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare information
Healthcare policy in Massachusetts involves the creation and implementation of laws, rules, and regulations for managing the state's healthcare system. The healthcare system consists of services provided by medical professionals to diagnose, treat, and prevent mental and physical illness and injury. The system also encompasses a wide range of related sectors, such as insurance, pharmaceuticals and health information technology.
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the 50 state legislatures collectively "make thousands of health policy decisions each year," not including the decisions made by local governments, which often oversee hospitals, and private bodies, such as insurers. These decisions can include budget appropriations, requirements for doctors obtaining their licenses, which services are covered by insurance, how personal health information is managed, and which immunizations children must receive, among many others.[20]
Healthcare policy affects not only the cost citizens must pay for care, but also their access to care and the quality of care received, which can influence their overall health. A top concern for policymakers is the rising cost of healthcare, which has placed an increasing strain on the disposable income of consumers as well as on state budgets.
Other issues in healthcare policy include
- state Medicaid expansion,
- health information technology and privacy,
- uninsured and underinsured portions of the population,
- a shortage of primary care physicians, and
- mental healthcare access and coverage.
Medicaid spending
Massachusetts' Medicaid program provides medical insurance to groups of low-income people and individuals with disabilities. Medicaid is a nationwide program jointly funded by the federal government and the states. Medicaid eligibility, benefits, and administration are managed by the states within federal guidelines. A program related to Medicaid is the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which covers low-income children above the poverty line and is sometimes operated in conjunction with a state's Medicaid program. Medicaid is a separate program from Medicare, which provides health coverage for the elderly.
Effect of the Affordable Care Act
The impact of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA), also known as Obamacare, has been debated among politicians, policymakers, and other stakeholders. The ACA was signed into law in 2010 by President Barack Obama (D). The law facilitated the purchase of health insurance through a system of health insurance exchanges, tax credits, and subsidies. Initially, states were required to expand eligibility for Medicaid under the law; a 2012 ruling by the United States Supreme Court made the Medicaid expansion voluntary for states. The law also required insurers to cover healthcare services within a standard set of benefits and prohibited coverage denials based on preexisting conditions. Under the law, all individuals were required to obtain health insurance.
Immigration Policy
Immigration information
Immigration policy determines who may become a new citizen of the United States or enter the country as a temporary worker, student, refugee, or permanent resident. The federal government is responsible for setting and enforcing most immigration policy.
Meanwhile, states assume a largely supportive role, enacting their own supplementary laws and setting policies that may, for example, determine which public services immigrants can access, establish employee screening requirements, or guide the interaction between related state agencies and their federal counterparts.
Some jurisdictions, including some states, cities, and counties, have adopted policies of not cooperating with federal immigration enforcement; these jurisdictions have become known as sanctuary jurisdictions.
Pension Policy
Public pensions
Massachusetts public pensions are the state mechanism by which state and many local government employees in Massachusetts receive retirement benefits.
There were 105 public pension systems in Massachusetts as of 2020. Of these, 14 were state-level programs. As of fiscal year 2020, membership in Massachusetts' various pension systems totaled 593,116. Of these, 306,565 were active members.[21]
Public policy in other states
Footnotes
- ↑ Fishman, S. & Barrett, R. (2012). Nonprofit Fundraising Registration: The 50 State Guide. NOLO.
- ↑ "Multistate Filing Form," accessed December 17, 2014
- ↑ Guidestar, Fundraising: What Laws Apply?" accessed February 18, 2015
- ↑ London School of Economics, "Campaign finance laws that make small donations public may lead to fewer people contributing and to smaller donations," January 7, 2015
- ↑ United States Census Bureau, "U.S. School System Current Spending Per Pupil by Region: Fiscal Year 2020," May 18, 2022
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "Fast Facts: High school graduation rates," accessed September 28, 2022
- ↑ National Center for Education Statistics, "College Navigator - Massachusetts," accessed December 15, 2014
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "School Choice and Charters," accessed June 18, 2014
- ↑ Friedman Foundation for School Choice, "What is School Choice?" accessed June 18, 2014
- ↑ All About Redistricting, "Why does it matter?" accessed April 8, 2015
- ↑ Indy Week, "Cracked, stacked and packed: Initial redistricting maps met with skepticism and dismay," June 29, 2011
- ↑ The Atlantic, "How the Voting Rights Act Hurts Democrats and Minorities," June 17, 2013
- ↑ Redrawing the Lines, "The Role of Section 2 - Majority Minority Districts," accessed April 6, 2015
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedEIA - ↑ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, "Government Performance and Results Act Annual Performance Report 2011," July 10, 2012
- ↑ The National Bureau of Economic Research, "A Brief History of Regulations Regarding Financial Markets in the United States: 1789 to 2009," September 2011
- ↑ Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, "The U.S. Federal Financial Regulatory System: Restructuring Federal Bank Regulation," January 19, 2006
- ↑ Brookings, "The Origins of the Financial Crisis," November 24, 2008
- ↑ The Cato Institute, "Did Deregulation Cause the Financial Crisis?" July 2009
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "Health," accessed July 8, 2015
- ↑ United States Census Bureau, 2020 Annual Survey of Public Pensions: State & Local Tables accessed February 23, 2022
