Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
RABINOWITZ et al. v. KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL (1964)

![]() |
RABINOWITZ et al. v. KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
---|
Term: 1963 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 2, 1964 |
Decided: March 30, 1964 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Hugo Black • William Brennan • Tom Clark • William Douglas • Arthur Goldberg • John Harlan II • Potter Stewart • Earl Warren • Byron White |
RABINOWITZ et al. v. KENNEDY, ATTORNEY GENERAL is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 30, 1964. The case was argued before the court on March 2, 1964.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the District Of Columbia U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1960s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Warren Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: First Amendment - federal or state internal security legislation: Smith, Internal Security, and related federal statutes
- Petitioner: Attorney, or person acting as such;includes bar applicant or law student, or law firm or bar association
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: attorney general of the United States, or his office
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 376 U.S. 605
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Earl Warren
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Arthur Goldberg
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes