RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY, JR. v. WASHINGTON (2004)

![]() |
RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY, JR. v. WASHINGTON |
---|
Term: 2003 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 23, 2004 |
Decided: June 24, 2004 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • Anthony Kennedy • Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist |
RALPH HOWARD BLAKELY, JR. v. WASHINGTON is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 24, 2004. The case was argued before the court on March 23, 2004.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Washington State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - statutory construction of criminal laws: sentencing guidelines
- Petitioner: Person accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: Washington
- Citation: 542 U.S. 296
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes