REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA et al. v. ALTMANN (2004)

![]() |
REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA et al. v. ALTMANN |
---|
Term: 2003 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 25, 2004 |
Decided: June 7, 2004 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Sandra Day O'Connor • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • Antonin Scalia • David Souter |
Dissenting |
Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • Clarence Thomas |
REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA et al. v. ALTMANN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 7, 2004. The case was argued before the court on February 25, 2004.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Central U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Retroactivity (of newly announced or newly enacted constitutional or statutory rights)
- Petitioner: Foreign nation or instrumentality
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Tangible property, other than real estate, including contraband
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 541 U.S. 677
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes