Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., ACTING WARDEN v. FERNANDO BELMONTES (2006)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., ACTING WARDEN v. FERNANDO BELMONTES
Term: 2006
Important Dates
Argued: October 3, 2006
Decided: October 13, 2006
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
5-4
Majority
Samuel AlitoAnthony KennedyJohn Roberts
Concurring
Antonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Dissenting
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens

ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., ACTING WARDEN v. FERNANDO BELMONTES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on October 13, 2006. The case was argued before the court on October 3, 2006.

In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the California Eastern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty (cf. extra legal jury influence, death penalty)
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: California
  • Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 549 U.S. 7
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Anthony Kennedy

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes