Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
ROBERT LOUIS MARRAMA v. CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al. (2007)

![]() |
ROBERT LOUIS MARRAMA v. CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al. |
---|
Term: 2006 |
Important Dates |
Argued: November 6, 2006 |
Decided: February 21, 2007 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
5-4 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Samuel Alito • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
ROBERT LOUIS MARRAMA v. CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 21, 2007. The case was argued before the court on November 6, 2006.
In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Bankruptcy (except in the context of priority of federal fiscal claims)
- Petitioner: Debtor
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 549 U.S. 365
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: John Paul Stevens
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes