Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
ROBERT MORRISON, et al. v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al. (2010)

![]() |
ROBERT MORRISON, et al. v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al. |
---|
Term: 2009 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 29, 2010 |
Decided: June 24, 2010 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
8-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
Concurring |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • John Paul Stevens |
ROBERT MORRISON, et al. v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 24, 2010. The case was argued before the court on March 29, 2010.
In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal or state regulation of securities
- Petitioner: foreign (non-American) nongovernmental entity
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: foreign (non-American) nongovernmental entity
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 561 U.S. 247
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes