Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

ROBERT MORRISON, et al. v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al. (2010)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
ROBERT MORRISON, et al. v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al.
Term: 2009
Important Dates
Argued: March 29, 2010
Decided: June 24, 2010
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
8-0
Majority
Samuel AlitoAnthony KennedyJohn RobertsAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas
Concurring
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgJohn Paul Stevens

ROBERT MORRISON, et al. v. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 24, 2010. The case was argued before the court on March 29, 2010.

In an 8-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Federal or state regulation of securities
  • Petitioner: foreign (non-American) nongovernmental entity
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: foreign (non-American) nongovernmental entity
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 561 U.S. 247
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes