ROSE v. ROSE et al. (1987)

| ROSE v. ROSE et al. |
|---|
| Term: 1986 |
| Important Dates |
| Argued: March 4, 1987 |
| Decided: May 18, 1987 |
| Outcome |
| Affirmed (includes modified) |
| Vote |
| 8-1 |
| Majority |
| Harry Blackmun • William Brennan • Thurgood Marshall • Lewis Powell • William Rehnquist |
| Concurring |
| Sandra Day O'Connor • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens |
| Dissenting |
| Byron White |
ROSE v. ROSE et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 18, 1987. The case was argued before the court on March 4, 1987.
In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Tennessee State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Federalism - national supremacy: marital and family relationships and property, including obligation of child support
- Petitioner: Veteran
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Child, children, including adopted or illegitimate
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 481 U.S. 619
- How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Thurgood Marshall
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes