Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

Rachel Rosnick

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Rachel Rosnick
Image of Rachel Rosnick
Elections and appointments
Last election

May 16, 2023

Education

High school

Weir High School

Bachelor's

University of Pittsburgh, 2005

Law

University of Pittsburgh School of Law, 2010

Personal
Profession
Attorney
Contact

Rachel Rosnick (Democratic Party) ran for election for the District Court 05-2-31 judge of the Allegheny County Magisterial District Court in Pennsylvania. She lost in the Democratic primary on May 16, 2023.

Rosnick completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2023. Click here to read the survey answers.

Biography

Rachel Rosnick graduated from Weir High School. She earned a bachelor's degree from the University of Pittsburgh in 2005 and a law degree from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 2010. Her career experience includes working as an attorney and as Regional Vice-President of the National Lawyers Guild .[1]

Rosnick has been affiliated with the following organizations:[1]

  • Allegheny County Bar Association
  • Dreams of Hope
  • Write Pittsburgh
  • Greater Pittsburgh Arts Council - Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts

Elections

2023

See also: Municipal elections in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (2023)

General election

General election for Allegheny County Magisterial District Court 05-2-31

Kate Lovelace defeated Anthony Vaccarello in the general election for Allegheny County Magisterial District Court 05-2-31 on November 7, 2023.

Candidate
%
Votes
Kate Lovelace (D)
 
85.2
 
9,678
Anthony Vaccarello (R)
 
14.5
 
1,650
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.3
 
33

Total votes: 11,361
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Democratic primary election

Democratic primary for Allegheny County Magisterial District Court 05-2-31

The following candidates ran in the Democratic primary for Allegheny County Magisterial District Court 05-2-31 on May 16, 2023.

Candidate
%
Votes
Kate Lovelace
 
32.0
 
2,479
Casey Mullen
 
24.8
 
1,923
Philip Roberts
 
19.2
 
1,485
Image of Rachel Rosnick
Rachel Rosnick Candidate Connection
 
18.0
 
1,397
Anthony Vaccarello
 
4.3
 
331
Richard McCague
 
1.0
 
79
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.6
 
48

Total votes: 7,742
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Republican primary election

Republican primary for Allegheny County Magisterial District Court 05-2-31

Anthony Vaccarello advanced from the Republican primary for Allegheny County Magisterial District Court 05-2-31 on May 16, 2023.

Candidate
%
Votes
Anthony Vaccarello
 
90.7
 
273
 Other/Write-in votes
 
9.3
 
28

Total votes: 301
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign themes

2023

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Rachel Rosnick completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2023. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Rosnick's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I’ve spent the past several years as a legal aid attorney representing at-risk juveniles and young adults at magistrate hearings in an effort to disrupt both the school-to-prison and the foster-care-to-prison pipeline. Through this and my previous work representing and supporting activists arrested at protests and demonstrations, I’ve been exposed to all various ways that different magistrates operate. I’ve seen what works and what absolutely does not work and know what can be done at the magistrate-level because I’m there almost every day successfully advocating for it on behalf of my clients.

Despite never being involved in politics before, I was moved to run for this position to reduce the harms that I see occurring in front of me every day. I hope to use the knowledge and skill set that I’ve developed while advocating for my clients to initiate positive changes for everyone in our communities.

  • I care. I truly believe that a big part of my success rate as an attorney is how much I truly care about the outcome of each hearing and its effect on my client. While it’s really rewarding to be able to help each individual client, I know that courtrooms are full of individuals that I’d care about just as much if I had the opportunity to know them. I hope to use the knowledge and skill set that I’ve developed advocating for my clients to initiate positive change for everyone in our communities.
  • I’m qualified. I’ve spent the last several years representing at-risk juveniles and young adults at magistrate hearings on summary offenses. Since approximately 75% of all filings at the magistrate level are for summary offenses, I’m uniquely situated to help make things better for our community due to both my subject matter expertise and practical experience.
  • I’m genuine. Throughout this election cycle, I’ve faced immense pressure to change how I speak and how I present myself to the world, and I’ve steadfastly refused to campaign as someone I’m not. I’ve never been involved in electoral politics before, I’m not part of any political alliances, and I don’t have personal or familial political or financial connections. I’m simply a legal aid attorney who was moved to run for this position to alleviate the harm that I witness nearly every day.
My campaign priorities are based on preventing the harms that I've witnessed in magistrate courtrooms throughout the county: 1) dismantling the school-to-prison pipeline, 2) ending the criminalization of poverty, and 3) implementing trauma-informed courtroom practices.
My judicial philosophy is based in harm reduction and the belief that court proceedings should attempt to restore all parties without causing further harm, exacerbating existing tensions, or becoming a source of further injustice.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on May 3, 2023