Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Rand Paul presidential campaign, 2016/Banking policy

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Rand Paul suspended his presidential run on February 3, 2016.[1]



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png Ballotpedia's scope changes periodically, and this article type is no longer actively created or maintained. It may also contain neutrality issues.



Rand-Paul-circle.png

Former Presidential candidate
Rand Paul

Political offices:
U.S. Senator
(Assumed office: 2011)

Paul on the issues:
TaxesBanking policyGovernment regulationsInternational tradeBudgetsAgricultural subsidiesFederal assistance programsForeign affairsFederalismPatriot ActNatural resourcesHealthcareImmigrationEducationAbortionGay rights

Republican Party Republican candidate:
Donald Trump
Ballotpedia's presidential election coverage
2028202420202016


This page was current as of the 2016 election.

  • Paul co-wrote a January 10, 2016, op-ed in TIME to promote his bill requiring the Federal Reserve be audited. He criticized the lack of transparency in the agency, calling it “a political, oligarchic force, and a key part of what looks and functions like a banking cartel.”[3]
  • During a speech in Las Vegas, on December 16, 2015, Paul discussed the Federal Reserve’s decision to raise interest rates. He said, “Is it a good thing or a bad thing to raise the interest rate? Well, I’m kind of agnostic on it. It’s kind of like if you ask me: All right, should the Politburo raise the price of bread or lower the price of bread? I like both prices, but the real question should be: Should the government be involved with setting prices? What amazes me about the Federal Reserve setting interest rates is that almost to a person, conservative economists in our country will say, wage and price controls are a mistake. Most economists will say, yes, we have to have free prices. Yet we very carelessly, I think, allow this power to go [to the Fed]. What happens is the price of money is set, basically, by a Politburo. But just like the price of bread, they have no idea what they're doing. The reason the Soviet Union failed is that it couldn’t come up with something as simple as the price of bread. You could say there are moral reasons for prices, and you wouldn't be an economist. You'd be a politician.”[4]
  • In a February 10, 2015, op-ed for Breitbart, Paul argued that there should be greater regulation of the Federal Reserve rather than of small community banks. He wrote, "So, after the banking crisis of 2008, we got alarmed and we passed regulations. The only problem is, we passed regulations on the banks that weren’t involved and gave more power to the bank that was involved—the Fed. No bank in Kentucky failed during this crisis, yet Dodd-Frank pummeled our small community banks with crippling regulations. What we really needed was more oversight of the Fed, not small community banks." Paul also expressed concern that the Federal Reserve was not properly independent from the executive branch.[7]
  • In an August 2013 interview, Paul said the Republican Party should adopt the Tea Party value of opposition to bank bailouts. "It has been a part of the early message of the Tea Party, but the Republican Party hasn’t captured that message. The average guy who’s working class is not real excited about paying taxes and sending it out to bail out a guy who makes $100 million a year. And so I think the Republican message should be that we treat people the same whether you’re a small business person, a working-class guy, or a big bank on Wall Street," Paul said.[8]

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms Rand Paul on Wall Street and banking policy. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

Footnotes