Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Redistricting in Hawaii after the 2010 census

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Note: Redistricting takes place every 10 years after completion of the United States Census. The information here pertains to the 2010 redistricting process. For information on more recent redistricting developments, see this article.


Redistricting in Hawaii
Election Policy on Ballotpedia Logo.png
General information
Partisan control:
Democrat
Process:
Hawaii Reapportionment Commission
Deadline:
150 days after commission forms
Total seats
Congress:
2
State Senate:
25
State House:
51

This article details the timeline of redistricting events in Hawaii following the 2010 census. It also provides contextual information about the redistricting process and census information.

Hawaii did not gain or lose any seats from the reapportionment after the 2010 census. The state population grew to nearly 1.4 million residents, an increase of 12 percent.[1]

Process

See also: State-by-state redistricting procedures

During the 2010 redistricting cycle, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission was responsible for redistricting. This was one of 9 commissions nationwide that was responsible for redistricting. Hawaii's redistricting commission was composed of 9 members, chosen by the following:

  • 2 by the Speaker of the House
  • 2 by the President of the Senate
  • 2 by the House Minority Leader
  • 2 by the Senate Minority Leader

These eight members then voted to appoint the ninth member.

The Hawaii Constitution provided authority for and outlines the duties of a reapportionment commission in Section 2 of Article IV.

Article IV is entitled Reapportionment and had ten sections detailing the process in the state. Section 6 sets the following 8 criteria for apportionment within basic island units:

  • 1. No district shall extend beyond the boundaries of any basic island unit.
  • 2. No district shall be so drawn as to unduly favor a person or political faction.
  • 3. Except in the case of districts encompassing more than one island, districts shall be contiguous.
  • 4. Insofar as practicable, districts shall be compact.
  • 5. Where possible, district lines shall follow permanent and easily recognized features, such as streets, streams and clear geographical features, and, when practicable, shall coincide with census tract boundaries.
  • 6. Where practicable, representative districts shall be wholly included within senatorial districts.
  • 7. Not more than four members shall be elected from any district.
  • 8. Where practicable, submergence of an area in a larger district wherein substantially different socio-economic interests predominate shall be avoided.[2]

Public Meetings

The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission held several public meetings on redistricting. Information on past meetings can be found here.

Public input

Members of the public could draft and submit their own redistricting maps on the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission website.

Leadership

The eight appointed members failed to meet the 30-day deadline to agree on a ninth member to serve as Chairman. The authority to select the final member went to the Hawaii Supreme Court.[3] The five members of the court all agreed to appoint retired Circuit Court Judge Victoria Marks. Marks, who retired in 2009, served 21 years as a judge. Since retiring, she had been working for Dispute Prevention and Resolution, Inc.[4] The Commission held meetings on May 11, May 24, and June 9.[5]

The 8 appointed members of the 2011 Reapportionment Commission were:[6]

  • Anthony Takitani- (appointed by Senate President) Vice Chair
  • Dylan Nonaka- (appointed by House Minority Leader) Vice Chair
  • Clarice Hashimoto- (appointed by Speaker of the House)
  • Harold S. Matsumoto- (appointed by Speaker of the House)
  • Lorrie Lee Stone- (appointed by Senate President)
  • Terry E. Thomason- (appointed by House Minority Leader)
  • Elisabeth N. Moore- (Appointed by Senate Minority Leader)
  • Cal Chipchase, IV- (Appointed by Senate Minority Leader)

Subcommittee

The commission also formed a subcommittee to handle the more technical details of redistricting. It was composed of four of the commission's members with each selected by one of the four appointing leaders. The members were as follows:

  • Lorrie Lee Stone
  • Cal Chipchase
  • Clarice Hashimoto
  • Dylan Nonaka

Census results

On February 22, 2011, the Census Bureau shipped Hawaii's local census data to the governor and legislative leaders.[7] Detailed data can be found here.[8]

City/County population changes

These tables show the change in population in the five most populous census-designated places and counties in Hawaii from 2000-2010.[9]

Census Designated Place 2000 Population 2010 Population Percent change
Urban Honolulu Not applicable 337,256 Not applicable
East Honolulu Not applicable 49,914 Not applicable
Pearl City 30,976 47,698 54.0%
Hilo 40,759 43,263 6.1%
Kailua 36,513 38,635 5.8%
County 2000 Population 2010 Population Percent Change
Honolulu 876,156 953,207 8.8%
Hawaii 148,677 185,079 24.5%
Maui 128,094 154,834 20.9%
Kauai 58,463 67,091 14.8%
Kalawao 147 90 -38.8%

Redistricting

Figure 1: This map shows Hawaii's Congressional Districts after the 2000 census.

June 2011: Commission to count non-residents

On June 28, 2011, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission voted 8-1 to include non-resident students and military personnel in redistricting calculations. In addition, the Commission also included sentenced felons in these calculations. The change in policy from previous decades was expected to benefit Oahu and prevent it from losing a senate seat. The sole "no" vote on the Commission came from Anthony Takitani, the only member who was not a resident of Oahu.[10]

July 2011: Dept. Attorney General issues advisory opinion

Attorney General David M. Louie (D) approved an advisory opinion written by Deputy Attorney General Charleen Aina, stating that the Hawaii Supreme Court would be likely to overturn the Commission's decision. She cited a 2005 case in which the court ruled that the term resident population, as found in the Hawaii County Charter, only referred to actual residents for purposes of local redistricting.[11][12]

Aina argued that the Supreme Court was likely to reach a similar decision at the state level. She contended, "The Hawaii Supreme Court would likely hold that to the extent they are identifiable, non-resident college students and non-resident military members and their families cannot properly be included in the reapportionment population."[13]

August 2011: Commission releases draft maps

On August 3, 2011, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission released its redistricting plans. The commission released two draft Congressional plans and one plan each for the House and Senate. The committee was expected to approve three draft plans on August 5, eliminating one of the proposed Congressional maps. The legislative plans would not pair any state senators but would draw three pairs of state representatives in the same districts. The deadline for preliminary plan approval was August 8 while the deadline for final approval was September 26.[14]

The draft maps can be found here. (dead link)

Incumbents paired:

The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission decided on preliminary plans for the state's two Congressional districts. Prior to the decision, the commission was considering two different maps, one that drew Congresswoman Colleen Hanabusa outside her district and one that did not. After the committee reached a 4-4 partisan deadlock, Supreme Court-appointed Chair Victoria Marks cast the deciding vote in favor of keeping Hanabusa in her district.

September 2011: Panel to exclude some non-residents

On September 19, 2011, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission voted to exclude about 16,000 military and non-residents in the state. The decision was a partial reversal of an earlier decision to include non-residents. The original vote was opposed by Big Island officials since the additional population could distort population counts in favor of greater representation for Oahu. However, the decision did not appear to remove enough non-resident population from Oahu to shift a Senate seat to the Big Island.[15][16]

The Commission planned to give final approval to the state’s new maps on September 26 (the deadline for plan completion). The maps up for approval were released to the public on Friday, September 23 and mostly resembled the preliminary plans released in August.[17][18]

September 2011: Panel approves final plans

On September 26, 2011, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission gave final approval to the state's redistricting plan, partially excluding the state's non-resident population. Because of the inclusion of some non-residents, the Big Island would not gain an additional seat in the Hawaii State Senate. Groups from the Island of Hawaii were expected to challenge the plans in court.[19]

February 2012: New drafts released

After seeing its first plans struck down by the Hawaii Supreme Court, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission drafted new redistricting maps for the state. The maps, tentatively approved on February 15, 2012, excluded another 100,000 non-residents. The plan paired 10 incumbents in the House and moved a Senate seat from Oahu to the Big Island. The drafts then faced a public comment period. Final plans were to be approved by February 27.[20][21][22]

  • Drafts of the new plans can be found here.

March 2012: Commission finalizes plans

On March 8, 2012, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission approved new legislative districts for the state. The first set of legislative maps approved by the Commission were invalidated by the Hawaii Supreme Court. The Commission released draft maps on February 15. However, two further rounds of revisions were made to those drafts, one reunifying communities on Oahu and another addressing concerns that the plan favored House leadership. Opponents of the plan (who prompted the second round of revisions) were not entirely satisfied and hinted at the possibility of further legal action.[23][24]

Legal issues

October 2011: Big Island Democrats challenge redistricting plan

In October 2011, Sen. Malama Solomon and several other Democrats filed suit, challenging the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission's decision to include most of the state's non-resident population in its redistricting counts. In past redistricting efforts, the state had excluded non-resident military and student populations. Their inclusion in 2011 redistricting calculations boosted the population of Oahu and deprived the Big Island of additional representation. The Commission argued that it excluded all the non-residents that it could given vague data.[25]

  • A copy of the petition can be found here.

October 2011: Kona lawyer files second challenge

On October 13, 2011, attorney Mike Matsukawa of Kona filed a lawsuit challenging Hawaii's redistricting plans. Unlike the first lawsuit that centered on the fact that non-residents were included, Matsukawa argued that the Reapportionment Commission did not try in good faith to exclude non-residents. He contended that the commission's eleventh-hour decision to exclude some non-residents was partially responsible for its inability to exclude them all. Matsukawa suggested that the late decision did not allow enough time to determine the actual feasibility of separating out non-residents.[26]

  • A copy of the petition can be found here.

November 2011: Governor, Reapportionment Commission file briefs

On November 25, 2011, the Hawaii Reapportionment Commission filed a brief defending the state's redrawn political lines against the two legal challenges.[27] The Commission argued that it excluded all the non-residents that it could given vague data.[28]

Named as a defendant in the first challenge, Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie sided with the plaintiffs and asked the court to order the Commission to start over. The Commission, in turn, asked for the cases to be dismissed and for their attorney fees to be reimbursed by the plaintiffs. The cases were heard by the Hawaii Supreme Court.[29]

January 2012: Redistricting plans overturned

On January 4, 2012, Hawaii's Supreme Court sided with plaintiffs in two lawsuits challenging the state's legislative redistricting plans. The court ruled that non-residents could not be considered in reapportionment. The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission was ordered to redraw the maps. Earlier in the year, the commission decided to consider some of the state's non-resident population in its redistricting calculations.[30]

  • The orders in the two cases can be found here and here.

January 2012: Commission asks Supreme Court to reconsider

On January 13, 2012, the Hawaii Redistricting Commission asked the Hawaii Supreme Court to reconsider its overturned redistricting plans. The commission argued that the representation provided by Deputy Attorney General Russell Suzuki was inadequate. The commission sought private counsel, but the Attorney General refused to either procure or pay for other attorneys. Gov. Neil Abercrombie (D) sided with the plaintiffs despite being named a defendant in the case. The AG's office defended Suzuki's legal representation.[31]

April 2012: Federal lawsuit filed

On April 6, 2012, Hawaii Rep. Mark Takai (R) and several non-resident military personnel filed a federal lawsuit over the revised redistricting map. In revising the redistricting map, the Hawaii Reapportionment Board removed 100,000 non-residents from their calculations. These revisions were ordered by the Hawaii Supreme Court following a state lawsuit.[32]

  • The petition in the lawsuit can be found here.

April 2012: Federal lawsuit moves forward

A federal challenge of Hawaii's revised redistricting maps got the go-ahead on April 10, 2012. A three-judge federal panel heard the case. The original maps were struck down by state courts for including non-resident military personnel and students in population calculations. The federal suit argued that these individuals should have been included.[33]

May 2012: Elections, lawsuit can proceed

On May 22, 2012, a federal panel refused to overturn Hawaii's redistricting plans. The court's denial of a preliminary injunction allowed both the lawsuit and the state's elections to proceed. The lawsuit argued that non-resident military personnel and students should have been included in the state's redistricting calculations. However, the court held that overturning the plan would not allow sufficient time to implement an alternative.[34]

  • The court's order can be found here.

History

Prior to statehood, 1900-59

The Territory of Hawaii was created by the Organic Act of 1900, which provided for a popularly elected legislature who was to be in charge of reapportioning itself by population. However, legislators ignored this, leading to a federal suit in 1955 to require reapportionment.

The Court took jurisdiction of reapportionment, finding the legislators in violation of equal protection and due process. Although this was appealed, it was rendered moot by an amendment to the Organic Act which stated that reapportionment would take place as set out in the proposed state Constitution. Prior to the 1958 elections, Hawaii's legislature was reapportioned for the first time since 1900.

1968 constitutional convention

In the early 1960s, the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled the Hawaii Senate apportionment unconstitutional. This was followed by a series of exchanges between the courts and the legislature and led to the 1968 constitutional convention, which had reapportionment as its focus. Delegates would end up offering voters three proposed amendments dealing with apportionment and districting, future reapportionment, and minimum representation for basic island units, all of which were approved.

Among the results of the convention was the use of registered voters as a population base due to the high number of military personnel and tourists, the division of the state into four basic island units, and the establishment of an appointed reapportionment commission. This commission first met in 1973.[35]

2001 redistricting

Deviation from Ideal Districts

2000 Population Deviation[36]
Office Percentage
Congressional Districts 0.32%
State House Districts 20.1%
State Senate Districts 38.9%
Under federal law, districts may vary from an Ideal District by up to 10%, though the lowest number achievable is preferred. Ideal Districts are computed through simple division of the number of seats for any office into the population at the time of the Census.

Lawsuits related to the 2000 Census

There were no lawsuits related to the Hawaii 2000 census redistricting process.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. Honolulu Star Advertiser, "Hawaii population grows to nearly 1.4 million," December 21, 2010
  2. Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  3. Greenfield Daily Reporter, "Reapportionment panel fails to agree on a leader, leaving decision to Hawaii Supreme Court," April 22, 2011
  4. Honolulu Civil Beat, "Retired Judge Named Hawaii Redistricting Chair," April 29, 2011
  5. Honolulu Civil Beat, "All Together Now: Panel Charts Redistricting Course," May 5, 2011
  6. Hawaii Free Press, "Hawaii 2011 Reapportionment Commission includes Jeff Stone's Wife, Hannemann Staffer married to Rail Contractor," March 20, 2011
  7. PR Newswire, "Census Bureau Ships Local 2010 Census Data to Hawaii," February 22, 2011
  8. Hawaii Reporter,New Analysis on Island Population and Housing Units Now Available on State Website, June 6, 2011
  9. U.S. Census Bureau, "Hawaii Custom tables 2010," accessed March 1, 2011
  10. Honolulu Civil Beat, "Hawaii Panel Votes to Include Military, Students," June 28, 2011
  11. Star Advertise, "Reapportionment vote unlikely to stand, official says," July 20, 2011
  12. The Maui News, "Attorney general’s office: No on nonresident troops," July 21, 2011
  13. Civil Beat, "Big Island Democrats Challenge Redistricting Plan in Supreme Court," October 11, 2011
  14. Honolulu Civil Beat, "Six Hawaii Reps Could Face Incumbents Next Year," August 3, 2011
  15. Honolulu Civil Beat, "Hawaii Redistricting Panel Excludes Some Military," September 19, 2011
  16. Houston Chronicle, "16K residents cut from Hawaii population base," September 20, 2011
  17. The Maui News, "Panel could affront legal dispute over redistricting," September 22, 2011
  18. Honolulu Star Advertiser, "Reapportionment Commission presents final redistricting maps," September 23, 2011
  19. The Maui News, "Panel could affront legal dispute over redistricting," September 22, 2011
  20. Hawaii Reporter, "Hawaii Commissioners Rushed Redistricting Plan Leaves Many Residents, Legislators Unhappy," February 16th, 2012
  21. Star-Advertiser, "Commission hopes to wrap up election redistricting maps by Feb. 29," February 15, 2012
  22. Star-Advertiser, "New election maps would shift Senate seat from Oahu to Big Isle," February 14, 2012
  23. Star Advertiser, "Commission gives final approval to new political maps," March 8, 2012
  24. Star Advertiser, "Panel produces amended state House district map," March 6, 2012
  25. Civil Beat, "Big Island Democrats Challenge Redistricting Plan in Supreme Court," October 11, 2011
  26. Civil Beat, "New Plan for Hawaii Legislative Districts Draws Second Lawsuit," October 14, 2011
  27. Civil Beat, "Big Island Democrats Challenge Redistricting Plan in Supreme Court," October 11, 2011
  28. Civil Beat, "New Plan for Hawaii Legislative Districts Draws Second Lawsuit," October 14, 2011
  29. West Hawaii Today, "Commission files brief in reapportionment suit," November 21, 2011
  30. Civil Beat, "Hawaii Supreme Court Rejects Redistricting Plan," January 4, 2012
  31. Hawaii Reporter, "Hawaii Reapportionment Commission Wants Second Shot with Hawaii Supreme Court," January 17, 2012
  32. Civil Beat, "Military Plaintiffs Take Hawaii Redistricting Plan To Federal Court," April 6, 2012
  33. Civil Beat, "Hawaii Reapportionment Challenge Will Get Day in Court," April 10, 2012
  34. Honolulu Civil Beat, "Elections on Track as Court Rules Against Hawaii Redistricting Suit," May 22, 2012
  35. Policy Archive, "Reapportionment Politics: The History of Redistricting in the 50 States," Rose Institute of State and Local Government, January 1981 (pg.83-92)
  36. National Conference of State Legislatures, “Redistricting 2000 Population Deviation Table”," accessed February 1, 2011