Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.

Richard Grady recall, Canyon Creek Rural Fire District, Montana (2025)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Canyon Creek Rural Fire District recall
Ballotpedia Election Coverage Badge.png
Officeholders
Richard Grady
Recall status
Recall approved
Recall election date
March 18, 2025
See also
Recall overview
Political recall efforts, 2025
Recalls in Montana
Montana recall laws
Special district recalls
Recall reports

Canyon Creek Rural Fire District trustee Richard Grady was recalled in yes/no recall election on March 18, 2025.[1][2] Recall supporters launched the campaign after Grady was accused of violating provisions of the Montana State Constitution, as well as open meeting and public participation laws.

Recall vote

Richard Grady recall, 2025

Richard Grady lost the Canyon Creek Fire District Board At-large recall election on March 18, 2025.

Recall
 Vote
%
Votes
Yes
 
74.9
 
146
No
 
25.1
 
49
Total Votes
195


Recall supporters

Recall supporters outlined the following reasons for the recall election:[2]

In the elected capacity given to him by the public, Chairman Grady violated his oath of office, demonstrating gross incompetence as a CCRFD Trustee and public servant. The County Attorney's Office advised Grady that he must comply with open meeting and public participation laws. Grady nonetheless proceeded to violate MCA§2-3-103 at the 9/30/24 and 10/7/24 board meetings, prohibiting the public from offering comments unrelated to the agenda and on 10/7/24, Grady allowed only secret ballot voting violating MCA§2-3-212. At the 9/9/24 and 10/21/24 meetings, Grady violated MCA§2-3-203 by conducting performance reviews without first seeking privacy waivers. Grady administered 10/23/24 and 10/24/24 meetings via email and without any public notice, and consistently violates public participation mandates under MCA§2-3-101 while holding excessive meetings over five months -many with consequential changes. Grady continually violates his sworn oath of office to uphold the Montana Constitution, Article II, Sections 8 and 9. Repeatedly disregarding the law and constitution and negligently administering meetings despite warnings, Grady lacks the competence to serve as our trustee. No explanations or apologies can remedy any of these consequences. We simply cannot support his callous disregard for the law and our rights. Please join us by voting FOR change. [3]

Recall opponents

Grady responded to the recall campaign against him as follows:[2]

I Richard Grady, Chairperson of the CCRFD Board of Trustees responding to the Recall Petition state that all the respective board meetings alleged in the Petition were in compliance with Montana Open Meetings laws. I state the allegations by the Petitioners are not clear and do not include supporting documentation.

  • CCRFD acted without need to seek a privacy waiver because personal information was not discussed. Nor, did any person with a possible privacy concern request privacy per MCA § 2-3-203(3).
  • Chairperson Grady asked for Public Comment as the Zoom Recording and CCRFD Minutes confirm, the CCRFD Treasurer demanded no Public Comment. See, MCA § 2-3-103(1)(c).
  • Chairperson Grady did not conduct a secret ballot as the Zoom Recording and CCRFD Minutes confirm. See, MCA § 2-3-212.
  • Chairperson Grady conducted emergency CCRFD meetings by email as permitted by MCA § 2-3-112(1), an emergency public safety concern existed. Water tender was in a critical unusable situation and emergency medical supplies were missing.
  • Chairperson Grady conducted only needed necessary meetings and length meetings consistent to protect the public, given that three prior members and a former fire chief quit without any advance notice, placing the community in an emergency situation. MCA § 2-3-101.

[3]

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing recall in Montana

Montana allows the following grounds for recall: physical or mental lack of fitness, incompetence, violation of the oath of office, official misconduct, or conviction of a felony offense.[4] To get the recall on the ballot, supporters must collect signatures equal to 15% or 20% of registered voters in the jurisdiction as of the last election for the office, depending on the office type.[5] Recall supporters have three months to circulate petitions.[6]

Recall context

See also: Ballotpedia's Recall Report

Ballotpedia covers recall efforts across the country for all state and local elected offices. A recall effort is considered official if the petitioning party has filed an official form, such as a notice of intent to recall, with the relevant election agency.

The chart below shows how many officials were included in recall efforts from 2012 to 2024 as well as how many of them defeated recall elections to stay in office and how many were removed from office in recall elections.


See also

External links

Footnotes