Richard H. Miller, II

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Local Politics Image.jpg

Ballotpedia provides comprehensive election coverage of the 100 largest cities in America by population as well as mayoral, city council, and district attorney election coverage in state capitals outside of the 100 largest cities. This judge is outside of that coverage scope and does not receive scheduled updates.


BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
Ballotpedia does not currently cover this office or maintain this page. Please contact us with any updates.
Richard H. Miller

Silhouette Placeholder Image.png


Prior offices
Broome County Family Court


Richard H. Miller II was a judge for the Broome County Family Court in New York. He served from 2014 to 2020.[1] He previously served as a judge on the Union Town Court from 1996 to 2014 and the Johnson City Village Court from 2002 to 2014.[2][3] On October 15, 2020, the New York Court of Appeals removed Miller from the bench due to charges of misconduct, including sexual harassment and failure to disclose outside income.[4]

Elections

2014

See also: New York judicial elections, 2014
Miller ran for election to the Broome County Family Court.
General: He faced Mark H. Young, Daniel D. Reynolds and Peter P. Charnetsky in the general election on November 4, 2014, and won with 31.5 percent of the vote. Candidates competed for two open seats. [1] 

2013

Miller ran for re-election to the Johnson City Village Court, New York. General: He won without opposition in the general election on November 5, 2013.[2][5]

2012

Miller was re-elected to the Union Town Court, New York after running unopposed in the general election on November 6, 2012.[6]

See also: New York judicial elections, 2012 - Town and Village Courts

Noteworthy events

Judge Miller censured for judicial misconduct (2002)

On December 30, 2002, the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct issued a determination after a hearing on formal charges for judicial misconduct. The formal complaint stated four charges. These included: presiding over the case of a family member related to one of his clients, acting as an attorney while also acting as the judge in a legal proceeding, and for various errors made by his court clerk on multiple court documents which were sent out with Miller's approval.[3]

After multiple days of hearings on the matter, the committee ultimately determined Judge Miller

. . .showed insensitivity and inattention to his ethical responsibilities and, in particular, to the special ethical obligations of judges who are permitted to practice law. In mitigation, we note that [Judge Miller] was candid, cooperative and contrite at the hearing and that he has acknowledged his misconduct.[3][7]

The committee determined Miller should be censured for his misconduct.[3]

See also

External links

Footnotes