Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.

Robert V. Bolinske Sr.

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Robert V. Bolinske
Image of Robert V. Bolinske
Elections and appointments
Last election

November 6, 2018

Education

Bachelor's

University of North Dakota, 1966

Law

Harvard Law School, 1969

Robert V. Bolinske ran for election for judge of the North Dakota Supreme Court. He lost in the general election on November 6, 2018.

Bolinske was a 2016 candidate for the North Dakota Supreme Court. He ran against Judge Jerod Tufte for the seat of retiring Justice Dale Sandstrom.[1] Bolinske was defeated.

Education

Bolinske received his bachelor's degree from the University of North Dakota in 1966 and his J.D. from Harvard Law School in 1969.[2]

Career

  • 1993-Present: Bolinske Law Firm

Elections

2018

General election

General election for North Dakota Supreme Court

Incumbent Lisa Fair McEvers defeated Robert V. Bolinske in the general election for North Dakota Supreme Court on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lisa Fair McEvers
Lisa Fair McEvers (Nonpartisan)
 
65.6
 
178,124
Image of Robert V. Bolinske
Robert V. Bolinske (Nonpartisan)
 
33.9
 
92,088
 Other/Write-in votes
 
0.5
 
1,458

Total votes: 271,670
(100.00% precincts reporting)
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for North Dakota Supreme Court

Incumbent Lisa Fair McEvers and Robert V. Bolinske advanced from the primary for North Dakota Supreme Court on June 12, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lisa Fair McEvers
Lisa Fair McEvers (Nonpartisan)
 
62.9
 
57,432
Image of Robert V. Bolinske
Robert V. Bolinske (Nonpartisan)
 
37.1
 
33,871

Total votes: 91,303
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Selection method

See also: Nonpartisan election of judges

The five justices of the North Dakota Supreme Court are chosen in nonpartisan elections to serve 10-year terms. Judicial hopefuls compete in a primary election, and the top two candidates advance to the general election in November. At the expiration of a judge's term, he or she must run for re-election to continue serving.[3] In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a replacement with help from a judicial nominating commission. Alternatively, the governor may call a special election to fill the vacancy.[3] Appointed judges serve for at least two years, after which they must run in the general election to finish the remainder of the unexpired term.[3]

Qualifications

To serve on this court, a judge must be:

  • a U.S. and state citizen and
  • a licensed attorney.[3]

Selection of the chief justice

The court's chief justice is chosen by vote of the supreme and district court judges to serve a five-year term.[3]

2016

Bolinske ran for a seat on the North Dakota Supreme Court in 2016. He faced Judge Jerod Tufte for the seat of retiring Justice Dale Sandstrom.

Election results

November 8 general election
Jerod Tufte defeated Robert V. Bolinske Sr. in the general election for Dale Sandstrom's seat on the North Dakota Supreme Court.
North Dakota Supreme Court 2016, Sandstrom's Seat, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Jerod Tufte 60.69% 166,229
Robert V. Bolinske Sr. 38.63% 105,805
Write-in votes 0.68% 1,851
Total Votes (432 of 432 precincts reporting: 100%) 273,885
Source: North Dakota Secretary of State Official Results
June 14 primary election

Because they are the only two candidates for the seat, Bolinske and Tufte both advanced through the June 14 primary to the November 8 general election.

North Dakota Supreme Court Primary, Dale Sandstrom's Seat, 2016
Candidate Vote % Votes
Green check mark transparent.png Jerod Tufte 55.03% 54,107
Green check mark transparent.png Robert V. Bolinske Sr. 44.65% 43,899
Write-in votes 0.32% 311
Total Votes 98,317
Source: North Dakota Secretary of State

Forums and debates

Sept. 22, Cass County Bar Association meeting

On Sept. 22, 2016, the Cass County Bar Association hosted a forum for candidates Jerod Tufte and Robert V. Bolinske Sr. At the start of the candidate introductions, Bolinske took issue with the mention of the State Bar Association of North Dakota recommendations, in which member attorneys rated Tufte higher than Bolinske. Bolinske said that the association ratings were "flawed" and "jiggered." He said, "[I]t made me mad."[4] According to the Bismarck Tribune, he also accused Tufte of contacting friends to puff up his survey results and said to Tufte, "I wouldn't trust you as far as I could throw you."[4] When asked whether his words and actions called his temperament into question, the Tribune records Bolinske's response as, "Temperament, smemperament. What did Jesus do when he chased the thieves out of the temple? … Well, it was a just thing." Bolinske also said, "You can tell I go from zero to 60 pretty quickly."[4]

Bar Association recommendations

In June 2016, the State Bar Association of North Dakota released the results of its 2016 judicial survey. The number of valid responses to the survey questions was 248. Attorneys were asked to rate specific qualifications of judicial candidates on a scale of 1-5, with 1 the lowest and 5 the highest. The responses were averaged and the average reported for each candidate in each category. Survey respondents were asked to refrain from giving an answer in a category if they did not have enough information to do so. The averages for Jerod Tufte and Robert V. Bolinske, Sr. are reported below. The number of respondents choosing not to give answers on a particular candidate in a particular category is in parentheses next to the average. The number of respondents choosing not to give any answers, in any category, on a particular candidate is in the last column.

State Bar Association of North Dakota Judicial Survey Results, 2016
Candidate Professional
Competence
Legal Experience Judicial Temperament Integrity Average No Response
Robert V. Bolinske, Sr. 2.99 (69 no ans.) 3.54 (58 no ans.) 2.50 (67 no ans.) 2.92 (73 no ans.) 2.99 41
Jerod Tufte 4.04 (51 no ans.) 3.52 (49 no ans.) 4.05 (54 no ans.) 4.22 (53 no ans.) 3.96 37
Source: State Bar Association of North Dakota

Campaign finance

Robert V. Bolinske, Sr. Campaign Finance Reports
ReportDate FiledBeginning BalanceTotal Contributions
for Reporting Period
ExpendituresCash on Hand
Pre-Primary5/13/2016$0.00$0.00Unknown$0.00
Pre-General10/7/2016$0.00$640.00Unknown$143.00
Running totals
$640$(0)

2008

In 2008, Bolinske requested that his name be placed on the North Dakota general election ballot for a supreme court vacancy without completing the necessary procedures to compete in the primary election. He petitioned the North Dakota Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the North Dakota secretary of state, Al Jaeger, to place him on the ballot.[5] He argued first that because there was only one candidate in the general election for the seat, a vacancy was created because an election, by definition, must be a choice between at least two candidates.[5] Second, he argued that legislative candidates could be placed on the ballot through the means he was seeking and that treating judicial candidates differently violated equal protection.[5]

The state supreme court held that the primary election laws requiring Bolinske to use proper procedures to place his name on the primary ballot did not violate his constitutional rights despite the different classifications of judicial candidates and legislative candidates.[5]

See also

External links

Footnotes