Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey.
Rod Lingsch
Rod Lingsch (Republican Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent Texas' 35th Congressional District. He lost in the Republican primary on March 5, 2024.
Lingsch completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. Click here to read the survey answers.
Biography
Rod Lingsch was born in McKeesport, Pennsylvania. He served in the U.S. Air Force from 1981 to 2003. Lingsch earned an associate degree from the Pittsburgh Institute of Aeronautics in 1976, a bachelor's degree from the University of Pittsburgh in 1981, and a graduate degree from Embry-Riddle University in 1999. His career experience includes working as a corporate pilot, police officer, and business owner.[1][2]
Elections
2024
See also: Texas' 35th Congressional District election, 2024
Texas' 35th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Republican primary)
Texas' 35th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 Democratic primary)
General election
General election for U.S. House Texas District 35
Incumbent Greg Casar defeated Steven Wright in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 35 on November 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Greg Casar (D) ![]() | 67.4 | 170,509 | |
![]() | Steven Wright (R) ![]() | 32.6 | 82,610 |
Total votes: 253,119 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Clark Patterson (L)
Republican primary runoff election
Republican primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 35
Steven Wright defeated Michael Rodriguez in the Republican primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 35 on May 28, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Steven Wright ![]() | 50.1 | 1,082 |
![]() | Michael Rodriguez | 49.9 | 1,077 |
Total votes: 2,159 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 35
Incumbent Greg Casar advanced from the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 35 on March 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Greg Casar ![]() | 100.0 | 28,830 |
Total votes: 28,830 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 35
Michael Rodriguez and Steven Wright advanced to a runoff. They defeated Dave Cuddy, Brandon Dunn, and Rod Lingsch in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 35 on March 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Michael Rodriguez | 27.1 | 4,085 |
✔ | ![]() | Steven Wright ![]() | 24.6 | 3,715 |
![]() | Dave Cuddy | 20.4 | 3,079 | |
![]() | Brandon Dunn ![]() | 17.9 | 2,700 | |
![]() | Rod Lingsch ![]() | 10.0 | 1,514 |
Total votes: 15,093 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 35
Clark Patterson advanced from the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 35 on March 23, 2024.
Candidate | ||
✔ | ![]() | Clark Patterson (L) |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Endorsements
Ballotpedia did not identify endorsements for Lingsch in this election.
2022
See also: Texas' 37th Congressional District election, 2022
General election
General election for U.S. House Texas District 37
Incumbent Lloyd Doggett defeated Jenny Garcia Sharon, Clark Patterson, and Sherri Taylor in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 37 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Lloyd Doggett (D) | 76.8 | 219,358 | |
Jenny Garcia Sharon (R) | 21.0 | 59,923 | ||
![]() | Clark Patterson (L) ![]() | 2.2 | 6,332 | |
Sherri Taylor (Independent) (Write-in) | 0.1 | 176 |
Total votes: 285,789 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Benjamin Ovard (Independent)
Republican primary runoff election
Republican primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 37
Jenny Garcia Sharon defeated Rod Lingsch in the Republican primary runoff for U.S. House Texas District 37 on May 24, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Jenny Garcia Sharon | 59.1 | 6,923 | |
![]() | Rod Lingsch ![]() | 40.9 | 4,791 |
Total votes: 11,714 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 37
Incumbent Lloyd Doggett defeated Donna Imam, Christopher Jones, and Quinton Beaubouef in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 37 on March 1, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Lloyd Doggett | 79.3 | 60,007 | |
![]() | Donna Imam | 17.7 | 13,385 | |
![]() | Christopher Jones ![]() | 2.0 | 1,503 | |
Quinton Beaubouef | 1.1 | 804 |
Total votes: 75,699 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Hasani Burton (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 37
Jenny Garcia Sharon and Rod Lingsch advanced to a runoff. They defeated Jeremiah Diacogiannis in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 37 on March 1, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Jenny Garcia Sharon | 46.8 | 9,087 | |
✔ | ![]() | Rod Lingsch ![]() | 27.8 | 5,403 |
Jeremiah Diacogiannis ![]() | 25.4 | 4,938 |
Total votes: 19,428 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 37
Clark Patterson defeated Nazirite Perez in the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 37 on March 19, 2022.
Candidate | ||
✔ | ![]() | Clark Patterson (L) ![]() |
Nazirite Perez (L) |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2020
See also: Texas' 34th Congressional District election, 2020
Texas' 34th Congressional District election, 2020 (March 3 Democratic primary)
Texas' 34th Congressional District election, 2020 (March 3 Republican primary)
General election
General election for U.S. House Texas District 34
Incumbent Filemon Vela defeated Rey Gonzalez Jr., Anthony Cristo, and Chris Royal in the general election for U.S. House Texas District 34 on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Filemon Vela (D) | 55.4 | 111,439 |
![]() | Rey Gonzalez Jr. (R) ![]() | 41.8 | 84,119 | |
![]() | Anthony Cristo (L) | 1.6 | 3,222 | |
![]() | Chris Royal (Independent) | 1.1 | 2,247 |
Total votes: 201,027 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 34
Incumbent Filemon Vela defeated Diego Zavala and Osbert Rodriguez Haro III in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Texas District 34 on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Filemon Vela | 75.1 | 39,484 |
![]() | Diego Zavala ![]() | 18.5 | 9,707 | |
Osbert Rodriguez Haro III ![]() | 6.5 | 3,413 |
Total votes: 52,604 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 34
Rey Gonzalez Jr. defeated Rod Lingsch in the Republican primary for U.S. House Texas District 34 on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Rey Gonzalez Jr. ![]() | 56.3 | 10,665 |
![]() | Rod Lingsch | 43.7 | 8,271 |
Total votes: 18,936 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Libertarian convention
Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 34
Anthony Cristo advanced from the Libertarian convention for U.S. House Texas District 34 on March 21, 2020.
Candidate | ||
✔ | ![]() | Anthony Cristo (L) |
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Campaign themes
2024
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Rod Lingsch completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2024. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Lingsch's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|- Restore America’s free market economy and pay off the federal debt. America is broken because the people we entrusted to run our government have bankrupted it. Politicians put our country $34 trillion in debt with $183 trillion in unfunded liabilities. The federal government has no revenue to fix anything, so they keep printing money adding $5 billion per day to the debt, stealing from our children’s future. My tax program eliminates every current federal and state tax, removing the tax burden from workers and businesses. My tax program is a flat tax that restores taxation to its Constitutional mandate. It will raise $75 billion per day so we can pay off the federal debt. Paying down the debt will enable economic reform we desperately need.
- Welfare reform that lifts people out of poverty and saves $2 trillion per year. The federal government has 83 welfare programs. Include the states, and that number jumps to more than 600. The welfare bureaucracy is too expensive and requires people to remain in a substandard government-subsidized way of life. Since 1935, $40 trillion has been spent on welfare and poverty remains at 11-13%. My welfare reform is a single program that replaces every federal and state program, saving up to $2 trillion per year. My program is not welfare, but a system that increases worker compensation and immediately lifts people out of poverty, providing them hope for their future. Please go to www.USCF.Life to learn more.
- I want to end the power that the wealthy and politicians have over our lives. When those who have power over us have no accountability to a higher authority, they will subjugate us. If you read Plato's and Aristotle’s political works and contrast them with what is happening in America, you will truly understand what they meant when they said some people should never be allowed to hold power. America desperately needs my solutions to fix the problems politicians and the wealthy created, which includes major political reform. We can heal America by holding those in power accountable; then, we can begin to fix other important issues like education, poverty, homelessness, immigration, crime, the criminal justice system, and much more.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Campaign website
Lingsch’s campaign website stated the following:
“ |
America is Broken! America is broken because the people we entrusted to run our government have bankrupted it. Politicians put our country $31.5 trillion in debt with over $180 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Now they have no money to fix anything. Despite record revenue through taxation, 90% of the federal government's income goes to mandatory spending for entitlements, welfare programs, and the interest on the national debt. Politicians have no options other than printing more money which adds to the federal debt and risks hyperinflation. Every problem we citizens have endured throughout our history came about as a result of the decisions made by politicians. The Great Depression, every economic recession, the housing market collapse, the outrageous college fees and subsequent student loan crisis, the news media crisis, the social media crisis, confusion over the pandemic, mass anxiety and hysteria of the population, inflation and high unemployment, mass lootings and the rapid increase in crime, even the extreme violence and numerous deaths from the Antifa / BLM riots. Politicians know exactly what they need to do in order to control and manipulate you but seemingly have no clue on how to solve any of the problems they created. Is it incompetence or intentional? If we are going to fix America's problems, we need to work together. We must stop voting for politicians who promise everything and give us nothing but chaos and confusion in return. Be the solution! If you would like to be part of the solution, please do the following. Read through these pages on the issues and reform processes to gain a better understand of what we can do to save America! Discuss these ideas with your family and friends. Then vote for the people who actually do care about you and are committed to making the American dream possible for all. America's Economy in Crisis In 1966, bank credit cards were introduced to the general public and went national in support of Keynesian philosophy. Along with other forms of unsecured credit, these devices quickly became a burden on consumers. Uncollateralized debt also became problematic for banks, so they adopted FICO scoring to help mitigate risk. When FICO scores prevented poorer communities from obtaining credit our government's solution was creating endless welfare programs. In the 1970's, as consumer debt increased so did corporate profits and salaries; however, workers' wages became stagnant creating income inequality. Politicians told us if we wanted to improve our quality of life then our spouses needed to work. As women entered the workforce household incomes did increase but it also added more financial burden to families. Most families needed a second car to help ensure their new lifestyle changes would be successful. Mother's needed affordable childcare that was safe and reliable. Both parents needed work clothes and other necessities for employment. Even though the 1970's was marked by high inflation and high unemployment, labor unions made some progress in improving the wages and benefits of their members. In the 1980's, computers and other advancements in technology increased the efficiency of workers. Workers doing more in less time gave corporations the means to significantly boost profits which continued to increase at an exponential rate over the years. As a reward for their hard work corporate elitists gave themselves extravagant salaries, while workers' wages continued to remain stagnant further widening the income inequality gap. Despite improvements and efficiencies, the average worker found themselves needing to spend 20% more time on the job each week just to make ends meet. The gains labor unions made on behalf of their members in the 1970's and early 1980's was quickly wiped out by hostile corporate takeovers. Corporate raiders bought up vulnerable companies, fired workers, cashed in the workers' pension plans, and pocketed the money reaping enormous profits. Although these tactics started in the mid-1980's due to failed government oversight of Wall Street, they still continue to this day with little to no intervention. Economists claim corporate raiding is a necessary evil that serves as a counterbalance to the poor management of publicly traded companies. Since the 1960's corporate executives' compensation grew 1,000% while the American workers' pay increased by less than 15%. The average yearly salary of America's 3 million corporate executives has increased to more than $21 million while the pay of American workers has stagnated over the last 50 years. Half of America's workforce, 80 million people, earn $35,000 or less per year. It appears from their actions that politicians and corporate elitists despise the American worker as demonstrated by business elites looting workers' private pensions plans, stagnant wages, and the ever-increasing income inequality. Corporations gave up millions of American jobs overseas to other countries while politicians allow tens of millions of foreigners to enter the U.S. illegally further adding to income instability and suppressed wages. Corporations tired of workers' demands for better wages and benefits have essentially waged war against the American workers with politicians happily appeasing their corporate elitists. President Clinton signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) into law on 8 December 1993. By consequence, it seems as if it was corporate retribution against American workers. NAFTA not only undermined wages and workplace safety in the U.S., but America also lost 415,000 high-paying auto manufacturing jobs to Mexico and 290,000 high-paying aircraft manufacturing jobs to Canada. Corporations seeking even higher profits looked for ways to abandon the American worker by exporting millions of jobs overseas to China, India, Indonesia, etc., but it doesn't end there. The EPA and now Climate Change has cost America millions of jobs and trillions of dollars in lost revenue. Currently, there are nearly 30 million undocumented workers in the U.S. depressing wages and further adding to the economic instability of citizen workers. If nothing is done to stop the current border crisis, more than 10% of America's population will be illegal immigrants before the end of President Biden's term in office. Corporations have been lobbying Democrats for unilateral control over replacing America's highly skilled tech workers with foreign workers at lower salaries. If passed, President Biden's Build Back Better (BBB) Act will give corporations the power to issue work visas without government oversight. While politicians continue to curry favor with wealthy elitists at the expense of American workers, our economy is struggling with the burden of poor political decisions. If we want to fix our failing economy, end income inequality, and pay off the federal debt we must reign in Keynesian policies and change our current tax structure. My USCF economic recovery plan in conjunction with the Currency Usage Tax (CUT) will fix America's economic problems within a few short years. CUT is a simple flat consumption tax that removes the burden of taxation from workers and businesses while paying off the national debt in less than 5 years. When we start paying down the federal debt our economy will begin to stabilize and become more productive. Only then will our government finally have the resources needed to bring resolution to our many other problems and start healing America. America's Crises in Education Prior to 1980, America's high school graduates and universities were rated number one in the world. According to the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), America's high school graduates now are rated only slightly above the 50th percentile of the 79 nations assessed in reading, math, and science. This places the U.S. at the bottom of the list for all industrialized nations. Overall, US colleges are now only ranked 18th out of the top 36 industrialized nations according to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) despite having some of the most technically advanced research universities in the world. Besides the results of international assessment and ranking, it has been obvious to parents for decades that the U.S. Department of Education (ED) and the National Education Association (NEA) have not been serving in the best interest of our children. In 1979, President Jimmy Carter signed into law the U.S. Department of Education despite concerns from many lawmakers that creating the cabinet-level position would require a constitutional amendment. Throughout the 1970s, the relentless complaint from liberals was that America was stealing the most valuable resource from other countries, its people. Foreign nationals from around the world would go to great lengths to attend colleges and universities in the U.S. They knew they would receive quality education leading to high paying employment. However, once their education was complete most would obtain these high paying jobs and stay in America. This became a primary reason why politicians wanted to create a Department of Education. This new Department of Education gave the federal government absolute control over F-1 and J-1 visas so they could decide which individuals were permitted to remain in the U.S after their education was complete. With politicians gaining control over education visas, liberals found their next grievance. Throughout the 1980's liberals incessantly complained that America's colleges and universities were racist. In 1978, the Supreme Court ruled in University of California v. Davis that race could be used as a factor in the college admissions process. However, in University of California v. Bakke (1978) SCOTUS affirmed the use of racial quotas to admit students exclusively based on race was a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. In 1987, politicians utilized the unrelated SCOTUS ruling in Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara, CA to justify their Affirmative Action quotas. The ruling stated employers establishing a quota system for hiring women and minorities in the workforce did not create a barrier to men as defined under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Politicians concluded this validated the use of Affirmative Action to enforce equity quotas on tertiary education institutions. ED mandated quotas created a biased system favoring the enrollment of women and minorities. The accomplishments of Asian and white men were significantly undervalued with women and minorities being elevated based on their gender and race. While equity quotas played a significant role increasing minority enrollment, they did not significantly increase minority graduation rates. However, the enrolment of women in colleges and universities has outpaced men for decades. As a result, women graduate from college at a rate of 2-to-1 over men. In the 4th quarter of 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor reported that women finally outnumber men in the college-educated workforce. Democrats uphold Affirmative Action as a success despite the fact that it is unconstitutional and has created numerous significant problems. According to liberals, their equity agenda means discrimination is justifiable even when it does harm to others. This form of systemic racial discrimination against white men has contributed to making suicide their second leading cause of death. Men make up 79% of the suicides in the U.S. with 105 men dying each-and-every day. Liberals perpetually tell us they are more compassionate, caring, and kind than conservatives. Where is the liberal's infamous self-aggrandized compassion when people actually die as a result of their enforcement of unconstitutional systemic racism. Politician's forcing Affirmative Action quotas on tertiary education is what created America's student loan crisis. Colleges and universities were required to take on lawyers and additional administrative staff to interpret ED quota mandates, set up new recruitment policies, create a system to rank students based on race and gender, then deal with the backlash once the new system was implemented. The proliferation of colleges taking on equity quotas in the 1980's resulted in a rapid increase in staff that did not teach or do research. As a result, students across the U.S. were confronted with the challenge of what became the relentless yearly increase in tuition and other fees. Today, some universities have as many as 9,000 administrative staff for every 10,000 students. When you include professors and other personnel, essentially each college student is paying for their education and the entire yearly salary of one of the university's employees. In 2010, the Obama Administration nationalized the student loan market by completely removing private lenders. Democrats devised the plan claiming they could raise $58 billion to help pay for Obamacare. It did not solve but added to the crisis. If all of this was not bad enough riots became all the rage on college campuses in the 1990's. Several riots would occur each year across the U.S. on campuses and they continued unabated. Typically, after a sporting events or some other campus function thousands of students would start destroying the property their colleges and within their local communities. More than 100 riots occurred over a 20-year period causing hundreds of millions of dollars damage. University leadership either afraid or unwilling to take action allowed this problem to exacerbate. Students became emboldened and started competing with each other bragging in their student union newspapers about how much more damage their riots caused compared to other college campus riots. Only after citizens forced states to pass laws holding students accountable did these riots finally subside in 2014. However, in 2017 riots became the norm again across campuses with the primary goal of suppressing conservative speech. This being a just cause in the minds of college and community leader they permitted riots to occur without consequence despite it costing their taxpayers many millions of dollars. Again, riots continued unabated until the pandemic hit America in 2020. These are just a few of the reasons colleges and universities have experienced a 17% decline in student enrollment with a loss of 3.3 million students. Our leaders have not only destroyed our institutions of higher learning for Americans but for the rest of the world. The U.S. is no longer a favored destination for foreign students despite America having some of the most technically advanced research universities in the world. Now the most favored nations are China, India, and Indonesia. The main reason America's primary and secondary schools were successful prior to 1980 was the decentralized implementation of state education requirements. School administrators and teachers knew best how to meet the educational needs of their students. School districts in-turn would make these needs known to their state education agencies which worked to meet their requirements. Imposing top-down education obligations from the furthest removed institution, the federal Department of Education has miserably failed America's children. Education reform in Texas is a perfect example of this issue. In 1995, Governor Bush signed his 1995 education reform bill which he called, No Child Left Behind (NCLB). The NCLB asked school districts to assess the needs of schools within their districts. That information was collected by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). TEA assessed the data which allowed resources to be disseminated based on the specific needs of Texas school districts. It worked in Texas because of this bottom-up approach. In 2002 when President Bush signed his No Child Left Behind Act into law it became a miserable failure. Every politician vying for their personal political gain added to the incompetence of the Department of Education making NCLB and enormous burden for teachers and administrators. NCLB has perpetuated a system where administrators of elite schools' force teacher to use class time teaching the assessment tests to poorer schools whose administrators allow students to fail in order to receive additional federal funding. After being lobbied for more than a decade, the Department of Education mandated a new requirement of inclusion for all public schools in 2005 called Gay Pride Week. The justification lobbyist used to convince ED this program was an absolute necessity was child suicide. The Department of Education was led to believe our children were committing suicide because their all gay and were being bullied by their peers. This agenda was forced upon public school system even though child suicide rates were decreasing every year since implementing the guidelines under President Clinton's 1994 Improving America's Schools Act. Further demonstrating that those involved do not care about the safety and wellbeing your children, child suicide rates have increased every year since these grooming standards were put in place. Under threat by the Department of Education withholding federal funds, 32 states immediately adopted the new guidelines in the 2005-2006 school year. Texas was not one of those states. In the summer of 2006, activists in Austin, Texas forced a referendum on the state legislature to adopt a gay pride week in Texas public schools. Texans voted and it did not pass. In 2007, Texas Democrats reintroduce the bill by where if Texans voted "No" it would pass. Texans voted and again it did not pass. This is the way the legislative process is supposed to work in America! In defiance, Austin Independent School District has imposed its own gay pride grooming curriculum on the students within their public schools since the beginning of the 2008 school year. If you were ever wondering how gender confusion became such an enormous problem for our children in such a short period of time, this was the impetus. Since 1980 the federal government has spent more than $6 trillion to improve primary and secondary education. This is above and beyond the $1.3 trillion that the states spend annually on public education. Politicians eagerly throw taxpayer's hard-earned money at issues as a band-aid to cover up the problem. Then they give themselves a pat on the back for a job well done only to have a continual decline in student performance. Problems will never be solved if their underlying caused are not understood. The Department of Education, state education agencies, academic research institutions, colleges, and universities are all struggling to solve the problem of America's declining academic performance. America has a very diverse multicultural society which makes this problem particularly complex, unlike the majority of countries in the world. America's current traditional education system works well for some students but increasing less so, for minorities and the socioeconomically disadvantaged. This disparity further exacerbates America's education problem creating cultural divides. Therefore, the paradigm must change with respect to education reform in America. If we want our educational institutions to be successful again, we must start by getting politics out of education. The federal government forced religion out of schools, we should be able to apply that same standard to political influences. The outdate classroom environment must be restructured. New technologies and methodologies must be integrated to meet the needs of America's diverse multicultural student population. New learning methodologies: such as, active learning environments (ALE), collaborative distant learning, student-centered learning, learning management systems, massively open online courses (MOOC), and simulation technologies are offering great potential for improving and streamlining America's education system. Research into augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) learning environments (VLE) are not only showing improvements in student's academic performance while realizing fewer behavioral issues. In particular, AR and VLE are demonstrating significant success in math and science. A consistent finding in these research studies show that students themselves say the enjoy the learning, feel better prepared, and are more actively engaged in the learning process. These are some of the academic changes that the USCF Primary and Secondary Education program will incorporate. Additionally, a very important part of USCF is the Primary and Secondary Education Fund (PSEF). PSEF ensures equitable distribution of funds to every school district in America. Every public school system in America receives $12.500 per student. This is one of the many ways USCF ensures every student in America has equal opportunity to learn and grow based on their desires and ability. Not at the whims of government bureaucrats trying to dumb down everyone to the lowest denominator through equal outcomes. America's Failed Welfare System In 1965, federal spending on welfare was $7.2 billion increasing 800% to $1.62 trillion in 2022. Since 2012, mandatory spending on welfare and entitlement programs has exceeded 70% of the total tax dollars collected by the federal government every year except two. Mandatory spending dipped below 70% in 2018 and 2019 but then the pandemic became the next crisis in 2020. Our government has no money to fix any of America's problems but continues to add trillions to its 83 failed welfare programs. Because the federal government is not capable of paying its bills it just keeps printing more money adding $4.6 billion to the federal debt each day, freeloading on your pensions and against your children's future. Welfare and the mandatory spending on other entitlement programs, Medicare and Social Security, are the unsustainable burden to the never ending federal debt (Cloward - Piven Strategy). State and local spending on welfare programs has also increased significantly. Spending only $2.3 billion in 1965 to over $1.33 trillion in 2022. That makes the total payouts for all state and federal welfare programs $2.95 trillion in 2022. States massive bureaucracies of 500+ combined welfare programs have become the leading expense in nearly every state. In these states, payments to welfare exceeds all other programs including primary and secondary education. When states spend more on welfare, they are forced to reduce funding for other programs such as education, law enforcement, fire, and rescue. This means lower salaries and higher student loads for teachers. Lack of proper training and quality control for law enforcement. Outdated safety equipment for our fire departments and other first responders. President Lyndon Johnson grew up poor. Campaigning in 1964, he declared war on poverty with his Great Society programs which he signed into law in 1965. His programs were highly ambitious having moderate success reducing poverty in the 1960's; however, by the end of the decade the poverty level stagnated around 13% as the bureaucracy of welfare became more burdensome making even higher payouts less effective. President Johnson made it known during his war on poverty speeches that providing support for the poor would not solve the issue of poverty if its underlying problems were not resolved. From 1935 through 2022, America spent $40 trillion on welfare and entitlements programs with an average poverty rate of 13% over that time period. Since 1965, the states and federal government spent a combined $25 trillion on poverty and the percentage of poor has only dropped below 11% a single year In 2019, the poverty level decreased to 10.5% as a result of policies enacted by President Trump in 2017 and 2018 which helped 7 million Americans escape poverty and join the middle class. Helping the poor elevate their status is a boon for everyone as it improves their quality of life and promotes economic productivity. Despite spending $8.15 trillion fighting the pandemic and poverty since its 10.5% low in 2019 the poverty level still increased to 12.8% by the end of 2021. As the U.S. population increases, so does the total number of poor in America which is 42.6 million according to U.S. Census data. When the first president in recent history who has enacted policies that actually benefit its citizens is voted out of office in favor of a President that thinks dumping trillions of taxpayer dollars into failed government programs is the only answer, you must begin to wonder who is really voting to keep the poor in poverty! In 2021, President Biden proposed his $3.5 trillion Build Back Better (BBB) plan and that amount was on top of his $6.1 trillion FY 2022 budget. Biden's BBB would have added another $1.44 trillion to the debt just for new welfare spending on top of the $2.95 trillion paid out by the states and federal government in 2022. That equates to an average of $69,154 for each of the 42,624,000-welfare recipient. Democrats love to throw your hard-earned tax dollars at problems as if money fixes everything but never offer any real solutions, and liberals have demonstrated throughout history that they have a natural inclination of turning every issue into a wicked problem when there are simple solutions for every dispute. The United States Citizen Fund (USCF) Welfare Reform eliminates the 83 federal and 500+ state welfare programs incorporating them into a single program. USCF is designed to significantly reduce overall government spending utilizing sound reform that increases government efficiency, streamlines bureaucracy, and improves quality. USCF and the Currency Usage Tax have become the only solution to reign in uncontrolled federal spending and pay off the national debt so that we can start working to solve all of America's other problems. U.S. Healthcare Crisis Federal and state laws make it illegal for hospitals to deny medical care for individuals who do not have healthcare coverage. These laws also make it illegal to deny healthcare to any of the 30+ million undocumented immigrants in America regardless of their employment, health insurance, or immigration status. As a result, $350 billion in unpaid medical expenses are passed along to you each year as part of your annual increase in medical costs. That amount is expected to increase significantly due to the more than 4.5 million immigrants that have entered the U.S. illegally in 2021 and 2022. While this is a leading cause of your healthcare costs increasing every year, Medicaid and Medicare have also added to your problems. In August 2011, the our elected officials forced sequestration upon the federal government due to the Obama administrations continuous $1.3 trillion deficit spending every year. As a result, the federal government reduced what it is willing to pay out for Medicare coverage. This is the way Democrats work. If anyone challenges their authority, they will find a way to retaliate through legislation. Since 2013, the federal government has reduced Medicare payouts by 2% each year. This leaves doctors, hospitals, and Healthcare Management Organizations (HMO) with only two options. Refuse to accept individuals covered by Medicare or pass on their loss of revenue on to you. Those of you who pay for your own private healthcare programs made up 40% of the overall 2022 healthcare expenditures ($1.8 trillion) while 10% of U.S. citizens paid cash for their medical care in what is called an out-of-pocket expense ($452.3 billion). Besides paying for your own healthcare, your government also gives you the opportunity to pay for the healthcare of the 166 million citizens who they claim are less fortunate than you. Your tax dollars paid 50% of America's $4.52 trillion healthcare bill in 2022 through state and federal programs such as Medicaid, Medicare, and CHIP ($2.26 trillion). Politicians tell us we need Medicare for All, now! What they describe as a single-payer healthcare system. They are determined to eliminate your private healthcare and replace it with a system that gives them absolute control. Politicians have a way of making it all sound so good but here's what they don't tell you. Medicare became law in 1965 and has required federal subsidies since 1969. In FY 2022, subsidies were required to cover 55% of the $908 billion in Medicare costs. Even with all workers and employers paying Medicare payroll tax it only covered 33% 0 of the $908 billion total Medicare expenses in 2022. Medicare spends significantly more than it brings in through the Even with all workers and employers paying into the Medicare fund, federal subsidies continue to make up about one-third of the total deficit each year. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) conclude Medicare will be insolvent by 2026. These are the real reason politicians want every citizen on Medicare. They know its collapse is coming soon and they foolishly believe they can reign it in by having complete control over who, how, and when you can have medical care. Every one of the thirteen 2022 Democratic presidential candidates supported Medicare for All even though they knew it would increase overall medical costs $5.2 trillion per year and eliminate more than 2 million jobs. Why would anyone want to do this? President Biden during his 2023 State of the Union Address (SOTU) claimed Republicans want Medicare and Social Security to go insolvent. There are better options than what Democrats propose. Democrats want to push through legislation; if you own your home or have more than $100,000 in your personal retirement account you will no longer be eligible for Social Security payments. For more than a decade Democrats and some doctors have been talking about denying anyone over the age of 75 medical care since they no longer contribute to society. Does anyone really believe that this would apply to these elitists? When politicians and elitists start talking about how responsible citizens should stop using medical care after the age of 75 then expect a law to soon follow. After all, America is one of the many Western Countries where euthanasia is now legal and medically funded, so why waste money on the elderly, chronically ill, or disable? President Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA) was supposed to fix America's healthcare problems. Have you ever noticed when politicians give legislation a really good-sounding name that it turns out to be the opposite of what they want you to believe? ACA, otherwise known as Obamacare, became law on 23 March 2010. Before ACA became law, 92% of Americans said they were satisfied with their healthcare coverage. President Obama assured us, do not worry, if you like your doctor or healthcare provider, you can keep them. Now, only 56% of Americans report they are happy with their healthcare coverage as many were forced out of their previous plans. Individuals also saw their healthcare premiums double and copays increase due to ACA regulations. ACA was supposed to fix America's healthcare enrollment and funding problems by making healthcare more affordable; however, enrollment only increased 7% leaving over 27 million American citizens still without health insurance to this date. However, since ACA's inception, Medicaid and CHIP increased significantly. 16 million individuals were added to Medicaid and CHIP by the end of President Obama's second term in January of 2017. This resulted in $4 trillion being added to the federal debt during that same time period just due to the increase in Medicaid and CHIP payments. Mental Healthcare Crisis On average 20% of adults and 17% of children experienced some form of mental illness each year. These numbers increased 5% during the 2020 pandemic which is 1 out of 4 adults (64.5 million) and little more than 1 out of 5 children (16 million). 1 in 20 adults (13 million) experience serious mental illness. Unfortunately, about 45% of adults and 52% of children never receive any mental healthcare. Lack of good mental healthcare is a contributing factor for the 25 million Americans who suffer from depression each year. Children whose chronic depression goes untreated can result in permanent changes to their brain structure which may lead to bipolar disease or other more serious mental illnesses. Prolonged untreated depression in adults leads to the early onset of neurodegenerative diseases such as; Alzheimer's, Dementia, Parkinson and other diseases. People who receive treatment for depression have a 90% success rate but less than half seek treatment. Lack of mental healthcare contributes to 23 million Americans who depend on alcohol or drugs to cope with mental issues. In 2022, there were more than 140,000 alcohol-related and 108,000 drug-induced deaths in America. That is 384 alcohol and 296 drug-related deaths each and every day. Losses due to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) costs America $300 billion each year while Substance Use Disorder (SUD) exceeds $600 billion. $900 billion could easily pay for Mental Healthcare for all in need. 60% of suicides in the U.S. are related to depression and this number increases to 75% when alcohol or drugs are involved. Each year there are 1.4 million suicide attempts resulting in nearly 50,000 deaths. Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death with men dying at a rate 4 times that of women. Due to relentless cultural persecution white men make up 70% of all suicides. Suicide is the second leading cause of the death of our children after accidents and the suicide rate has increase every year since 2005 after a previous decade of continuous decline. Depression and mental health are manageable. Suicides are preventable if we make healthcare proactive and take our mental health seriously. America leads the world with the most advanced hospitals, medical systems, and research but care for the average citizen is more like reactive sick care than proactive health care. We have the knowledge and ability to identify most illnesses before they onset but when your country is $31.5 trillion in debt with $180 trillion in unfunded liabilities, only elitists can afford the medical care that actually sustains quality of life. USCF has a much better plan to make preemptive proactive healthcare available for all Americans instead of the bankrupt sick care system where politicians decide who gets medical care and euthanizes their undesirables. Read about the healthcare solutions on this website to gain a better understanding of how medical care can be made available for every citizen while reducing costs and improving the quality of care. Pandemic Response
These guiding principles likewise applied to the U.S. National Strategy for Pandemic Response. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the 1824 landmark case Gibbons v. Ogden that the power to enforce quarantine or other measures in the name of public health belonged to the states. In the 1905 seminal case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts the SCOTUS upheld a state's legal authority to enact vaccination policies. That decision was reaffirmed in the 1922 case Zucht v. King when the SCOTUS ruled that a San Antonio, Texas school district could exclude students from attending school until they receive required vaccinations. Federal CDC guidance tells states to utilize the least restrictive methods that will achieve the state's concerns for public safety, particularly when the guidelines involve limiting individuals' liberty. While the Constitution protects certain rights and liberties of individuals from government interference, individual rights do not surpass the collective rights of a community. This was a landmark decision made by SCOTUS under Jacobson v. Massachusetts; however, the Jacobson case also established four specific standards that government must meet in order to apply public health measures that would permissibly restrict individual rights:
To reiterate the governors; decide the protocols for vaccinations, quarantine procedures, or other requirements in the interest of public safety within their states, not the federal government. Additionally, this SCOTUS ruling affirms every citizen's Constitutional rights that no level of government can force any individual against their will to be vaccinated! The decisions on which businesses stay open or remain closed, school attendance, social distancing, mask mandates, etc. are the responsibility of the governors of their respective states. It was essential that local communities provide the most accurate data on infection rates and information about treatment response without bias. Providing top-down support with bottom-up execution and data collection is the most efficient process in a crisis. Accurate unbiased data helps states know what is best for their states, and local communities what is best for their communities. The federal government has proven countless times that when dictating to the lowest level of government they are inept if not totally incompetent. The federal government has the resources and can bring together leading experts, but their most important job is providing common sense leadership. In times of crisis, citizens look to their elected leaders to demonstrate leadership; showing solidarity to help calm fears; working together providing hope for a quick resolution; making themselves available every day to ensure progress is known; being open and honest with the public and press when answering questions and concerns. President Trump did all of these things but was undermined by rival politicians with false information while being excoriated by the media daily. Instead of offering useful information, advice, or guidance, they worked to sabotage everything his administration accomplished every day. This only served to further divide Americans when we desperately need unity. The shameful behavior of our elected officials likely resulted in tens of thousands of Americans dying because of the confusion and discord they created.[3] |
” |
—Rod Lingsch’s campaign website (2024)[4] |
2022
Rod Lingsch completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Lingsch's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|- Americans are scared of how bad things are in the U.S., but if you truly understood how catastrophic everything really is then you would be terrified. Politicians know because they created all the problems, but they don’t want you to know the truth, and that is why America is so divided. We must stop living the lies and work together if we hope to restore America. Humans can solve any problem when they put aside their differences and work together. If we fix these problems in this order everything else will fall into place: economy & taxation to pay off debt, entitlements & education to end poverty, healthcare & infrastructure to mitigate crime, politics & national security to end illegal immigration. My reform plans will fix every problem.
- Every institution in America is broken! Politicians know how bad things really are, but none know how to fix any of the disasters they created. When problems get out of control politicians will lie to divide people, one against another. You can tell the end is near when everything is burning down around you and they say everything is fine. We cannot fix America’s problems until we end the federal debt. Everything politicians tried has failed, and now we are $30 trillion in debt. We must reign in Keynesian policies and change our tax structure to restore our economy to free-market principles. My single flat tax removes the burden from workers and businesses while paying off the national debt in 4 years. We must work together for change now!
- When our economy starts healing, we can begin healing America. Priorities are entitlements, education, and healthcare. Entitlements are the largest part of budgets, but poverty has never dropped below 11%. Welfare destroys our communities despite spending over $40 trillion to help the poor. My entitlement reform will restore communities and bring an end to poverty. My education reform brings quality education and gives children hope for their future. Providing equal funding for all school districts promotes consistent equal opportunities. My healthcare reform is preemptive and proactive care that is free for children in school and adults only pay for what they need. Fix these major problems and solutions for other issues will become easier.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
2020
Rod Lingsch did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
See also
2024 Elections
External links
Candidate U.S. House Texas District 35 |
Personal |
Footnotes
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on February 3, 2022
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on January 27, 2024
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Rod Lingsch for Congress 2024, “Issues,” accessed January 14, 2024