Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al. (1989)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al.
Term: 1988
Important Dates
Argued: April 19, 1989
Decided: June 23, 1989
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
6-3
Majority
Harry BlackmunAnthony KennedySandra Day O'ConnorWilliam RehnquistByron White
Concurring
Antonin Scalia
Dissenting
William BrennanThurgood MarshallJohn Paul Stevens

SABLE COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 1989. The case was argued before the court on April 19, 1989.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Central U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1980s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: First Amendment - Obscenity, federal
  • Petitioner: Telephone, telecommunications, or telegraph company
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Federal Communications Commission (including a predecessor, Federal Radio Commission)
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 492 U.S. 115
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Appeal
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Byron White

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes