Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
SALVADOR GODINEZ, WARDEN v. RICHARD ALLAN MORAN (1993)

![]() |
SALVADOR GODINEZ, WARDEN v. RICHARD ALLAN MORAN |
---|
Term: 1992 |
Important Dates |
Argued: April 21, 1993 |
Decided: June 24, 1993 |
Outcome |
Reversed and remanded |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • David Souter • Clarence Thomas • Byron White |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy • Antonin Scalia |
Dissenting |
Harry Blackmun • John Paul Stevens |
SALVADOR GODINEZ, WARDEN v. RICHARD ALLAN MORAN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 24, 1993. The case was argued before the court on April 21, 1993.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Nevada U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Criminal Procedure - Plea bargaining: the constitutionality of and/or the circumstances of its exercise
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Nevada
- Respondent type: Person convicted of crime
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 509 U.S. 389
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes