Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

SAMUEL SWARTWOUT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN GIHON et al. (1845)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
SAMUEL SWARTWOUT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN GIHON et al.
Term: 1845
Important Dates
Decided: January 15, 1845
Outcome
Affirmed (includes modified)
Vote
7-0
Majority
John CatronPeter Vivian DanielJohn McKinleyJohn McLeanJoseph StoryRoger Brooke TaneyJames Moore Wayne

SAMUEL SWARTWOUT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN GIHON et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 15, 1845.

In a 7-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York U.S. Circuit for (all) District(s) of New York.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1840s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Taney Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federal Taxation - federal taxation, typically under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
  • Petitioner: Governmental employee or job applicant
  • Petitioner state: United States
  • Respondent type: Shipper, including importer and exporter
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 44 U.S. 110
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Roger Brooke Taney
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Roger Brooke Taney

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.

See also

External links

Footnotes