Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

SARATOGA FISHING COMPANY v. J. M. MARTINAC & COMPANY AND MARCO SEATTLE INC. (1997)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
SARATOGA FISHING COMPANY v. J. M. MARTINAC & COMPANY AND MARCO SEATTLE INC.
Term: 1996
Important Dates
Argued: February 18, 1997
Decided: June 2, 1997
Outcome
Reversed
Vote
6-3
Majority
Stephen BreyerRuth Bader GinsburgAnthony KennedyWilliam RehnquistDavid SouterJohn Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Sandra Day O'ConnorAntonin ScaliaClarence Thomas

SARATOGA FISHING COMPANY v. J. M. MARTINAC & COMPANY AND MARCO SEATTLE INC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 2, 1997. The case was argued before the court on February 18, 1997.

In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Southern U.S. District Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, other than as in sufficiency of evidence, election of remedies, punitive damages
  • Petitioner: Fisherman or fishing company
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Manufacturer
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 520 U.S. 875
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Stephen Breyer

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes