Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.
SARATOGA FISHING COMPANY v. J. M. MARTINAC & COMPANY AND MARCO SEATTLE INC. (1997)

![]() |
SARATOGA FISHING COMPANY v. J. M. MARTINAC & COMPANY AND MARCO SEATTLE INC. |
---|
Term: 1996 |
Important Dates |
Argued: February 18, 1997 |
Decided: June 2, 1997 |
Outcome |
Reversed |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • William Rehnquist • David Souter • John Paul Stevens |
Dissenting |
Sandra Day O'Connor • Antonin Scalia • Clarence Thomas |
SARATOGA FISHING COMPANY v. J. M. MARTINAC & COMPANY AND MARCO SEATTLE INC. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 2, 1997. The case was argued before the court on February 18, 1997.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the California Southern U.S. District Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, other than as in sufficiency of evidence, election of remedies, punitive damages
- Petitioner: Fisherman or fishing company
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Manufacturer
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 520 U.S. 875
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Stephen Breyer
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes