Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
SAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK (1907)

![]() |
SAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK |
---|
Term: 1906 |
Important Dates |
Argued: March 21, 1907 |
Decided: May 27, 1907 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
7-2 |
Majority |
David Josiah Brewer • Melville Weston Fuller • John Marshall Harlan • Oliver Wendell Holmes • William Henry Moody • Rufus Wheeler Peckham • Edward Douglass White |
Dissenting |
William Rufus Day • Joseph McKenna |
SAUER v. CITY OF NEW YORK is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 27, 1907. The case was argued before the court on March 21, 1907.
In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the New York State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Due Process - Due process: takings clause, or other non-constitutional governmental taking of property
- Petitioner: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: City, town, township, village, or borough government or governmental unit
- Respondent state: New York
- Citation: 206 U.S. 536
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
- Who wrote the majority opinion: William Henry Moody
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes