Your monthly support provides voters the knowledge they need to make confident decisions at the polls. Donate today.

SCHUYLER NATIONAL BANK v. GADSDEN (1903)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
SCHUYLER NATIONAL BANK v. GADSDEN
Term: 1903
Important Dates
Argued: November 3, 1903
Decided: December 7, 1903
Outcome
Reversed and remanded
Vote
7-2
Majority
William Rufus DayMelville Weston FullerJohn Marshall HarlanOliver Wendell HolmesJoseph McKennaRufus Wheeler PeckhamEdward Douglass White
Dissenting
David Josiah BrewerHenry Billings Brown

SCHUYLER NATIONAL BANK v. GADSDEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on December 7, 1903. The case was argued before the court on November 3, 1903.

In a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. The case originated from the Nebraska State Trial Court.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Federalism - federal pre-emption of state legislation or regulation. cf. state regulation of business. rarely involves union activity. Does not involve constitutional interpretation unless the Court says it does.
  • Petitioner: Bank, savings and loan, credit union, investment company
  • Petitioner state: Unknown
  • Respondent type: Injured person or legal entity, nonphysically and non-employment related
  • Respondent state: Unknown
  • Citation: 191 U.S. 451
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Edward Douglass White

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes