Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. DONOHUE (1908)

![]() |
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. DONOHUE |
---|
Term: 1907 |
Important Dates |
Decided: May 4, 1908 |
Outcome |
Affirmed (includes modified) |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
William Rufus Day • John Marshall Harlan • Oliver Wendell Holmes • Joseph McKenna • Rufus Wheeler Peckham • Edward Douglass White |
Dissenting |
David Josiah Brewer • Melville Weston Fuller • William Henry Moody |
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. DONOHUE is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on May 4, 1908.
In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the ruling of the lower court. The case originated from the Minnesota State Trial Court.
For a full list of cases decided in the 1900s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Fuller Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Liability, other than as in sufficiency of evidence, election of remedies, punitive damages
- Petitioner: Railroad
- Petitioner state: Unknown
- Respondent type: Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
- Respondent state: Unknown
- Citation: 210 U.S. 21
- How the court took jurisdiction: Writ of error
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: Melville Weston Fuller
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Edward Douglass White
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes