Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., PLAINTIFFS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. (2010)

![]() |
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., PLAINTIFFS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. |
---|
Term: 2009 |
Important Dates |
Argued: January 11, 2010 |
Decided: June 1, 2010 |
Vote |
6-3 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Antonin Scalia • John Paul Stevens |
Concurring |
Anthony Kennedy • Sonia Sotomayor |
Dissenting |
Stephen Breyer • John Roberts • Clarence Thomas |
STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., PLAINTIFFS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 1, 2010. The case was argued before the court on January 11, 2010.
The U.S. Supreme Court made a 6-3 ruling.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Economic Activity - Natural resources - environmental protection (cf. national supremacy: natural resources, national supremacy: pollution)
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Alabama
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: North Carolina
- Citation: 560 U.S. 330
- How the court took jurisdiction: Original
- What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Antonin Scalia
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as conservative.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes