Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. (June 19, 2000)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.
Term: 1999
Important Dates
Argued: April 25, 2000
Decided: June 19, 2000
Vote
6-3
Majority
Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens
Dissenting
Sandra Day O'Connor • William Rehnquist • Clarence Thomas

STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 19, 2000. The case was argued before the court on April 25, 2000.

The U.S. Supreme Court made a 6-3 ruling.

For a full list of cases decided in the 1990s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Rehnquist Court, click here.

[1]

About the case

  • Subject matter: Civil Rights - Indians (other than pertains to state jurisdiction over)
  • Petitioner: State
  • Petitioner state: Arizona
  • Respondent type: State
  • Respondent state: California
  • Citation: 530 U.S. 392
  • How the court took jurisdiction: Original
  • What type of decision was made: Opinion of the court (orally argued)
  • Who was the chief justice: William Rehnquist
  • Who wrote the majority opinion: Ruth Bader Ginsburg

These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as liberal.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Harold J. Spaeth, Lee Epstein, et al., "2023 Supreme Court Database, Version 2023 Release 1 and SCDB Legacy 07," accessed March 21, 2024
Retrieved from "https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=STATE_OF_ARIZONA_v._STATE_OF_CALIFORNIA,_et_al._(June_19,_2000)&oldid=9518030"