Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al. (2006)

![]() |
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al. |
---|
Term: 2005 |
Important Dates |
Decided: March 27, 2006 |
Outcome |
Stay, petition, or motion granted |
Vote |
9-0 |
Majority |
Samuel Alito • Stephen Breyer • Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Anthony Kennedy • John Roberts • Antonin Scalia • David Souter • John Paul Stevens • Clarence Thomas |
STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al. is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on March 27, 2006.
In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition, stay, or motion.
For a full list of cases decided in the 2000s, click here. For a full list of cases decided by the Roberts Court, click here.
About the case
- Subject matter: Interstate Relations - Non-real property dispute between states
- Petitioner: State
- Petitioner state: Arizona
- Respondent type: State
- Respondent state: California
- Citation: 547 U.S. 150
- How the court took jurisdiction: Cert
- What type of decision was made: Decrees
- Who was the chief justice: John Roberts
- Who wrote the majority opinion: Unknown
These data points were accessed from The Supreme Court Database, which also attempts to categorize the ideological direction of the court's ruling in each case. This case's ruling was categorized as unspecifiable.
See also
- United States Supreme Court cases and courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- History of the Supreme Court
- United States federal courts
- Ballotpedia's Robe & Gavel newsletter
External links
Footnotes