Saddleback Valley Unified School District, California

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Saddleback Valley Unified School District
School Board badge.png
Orange County, California
District details
Superintendent: Crystal Turner
# of school board members: 5
Website: Link

Saddleback Valley Unified School District is a school district in California.

Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...

Superintendent

BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates.

Crystal Turner is the superintendent of the Saddleback Valley Unified School District. Turner was appointed superintendent in April 2017. Turner's previous career experience includes working as a third-grade teacher, elementary school principal, and assistant superintendent of administrative services.[1]

School board

The Saddleback Valley Unified School District school board consists of five members elected by district to four-year terms.

Elections

See also: Saddleback Valley Unified School District, California, elections

Members of the Saddleback Valley Unified School District school board are elected to four-year terms. Two or three seats are up for election on a staggered basis every even-numbered year in November.

Three seats on the board were up for general election on November 5, 2024.


Ballotpedia covered school board elections in 367 school districts in 29 states in 2024. Those school districts had a total student enrollment of 12,203,404 students. Click here to read an analysis of those elections.


Join the conversation about school board politics

Hall Pass

Stay up to date on school board politics!

Subscribe for a weekly roundup of the sharpest commentary and research from across the political spectrum with Ballotpedia's Hall Pass newsletter.


Public participation in board meetings

The Saddleback Valley Unified School District school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[2]


District map

Budget

The following statistics were published by the National Center for Education Statistics, which is a part of the U.S. Department of Education.[3]

Revenue, 2021-2022
SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT PER STUDENT PERCENT
Federal: $31,983,000 $1,311 8%
Local: $252,153,000 $10,338 63%
State: $118,968,000 $4,878 30%
Total: $403,104,000 $16,527
Expenditures, 2021-2022
TYPE AMOUNT AMOUNT PER STUDENT PERCENT
Total Expenditures: $364,345,000 $14,938
Total Current Expenditures: $334,957,000 $13,733
Instructional Expenditures: $224,234,000 $9,193 62%
Student and Staff Support: $37,449,000 $1,535 10%
Administration: $34,284,000 $1,405 9%
Operations, Food Service, Other: $38,990,000 $1,598 11%
Total Capital Outlay: $9,493,000 $389
Construction: $8,813,000 $361
Total Non El-Sec Education & Other: $7,209,000 $295
Interest on Debt: $3,133,000 $128


Teacher salaries

The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.

Year Minimum Maximum
2024-2025[4] $63,300 $133,169
2023-2024[5] $62,630 $131,760
2018-2019[6] $52,870 $111,226

Academic performance

Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[7]

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific Islander (%) Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native American (%) Two or More Races (%) White (%)
2020-2021 51 75-79 <50 29 PS 65-69 58
2018-2019 53 73 30-34 31 <50 69 63
2017-2018 52 73 30-34 31 21-39 64 61
2016-2017 51 72 25-29 31 40-59 64 62
2015-2016 50 71 25-29 29 40-59 63 59
2014-2015 48 68 30-34 27 40-59 62 57
2013-2014 77 85-89 60-69 64 PS 80-84 83
2012-2013 73 87 55-59 56 70-79 84 81
2011-2012 73 86 60-64 56 60-69 82 80
2010-2011 74 86 60-64 55 60-69 82 80

The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific Islander (%) Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native American (%) Two or More Races (%) White (%)
2020-2021 73 85-89 40-59 60 PS 75-79 79
2018-2019 64 79 50-54 45 <50 76 73
2017-2018 64 81 40-44 46 40-59 75 73
2016-2017 64 78 45-49 46 60-79 75 74
2015-2016 65 79 50-54 47 40-59 75 74
2014-2015 62 75 50-54 42 60-79 72 71
2013-2014 72 75-79 70-79 57 PS 70-74 80
2012-2013 73 83 65-69 54 70-79 83 82
2011-2012 75 85 70-74 57 60-69 85 83
2010-2011 75 85 65-69 55 80-89 84 83

The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:

School year All (%) Asian/Pacific Islander (%) Black (%) Hispanic (%) Native American (%) Two or More Races (%) White (%)
2019-2020 93 >=95 >=80 89 PS 90-94 95
2018-2019 93 90-94 80-89 89 PS 90-94 95
2017-2018 92 >=95 80-89 87 >=50 >=95 95
2016-2017 93 >=95 >=90 90 >=50 >=95 94
2015-2016 96 >=95 >=90 93 >=50 >=95 97
2014-2015 95 >=95 >=90 92 >=50 >=95 97
2013-2014 95 >=95 >=90 91 >=50 >=95 96
2012-2013 95 >=95 >=90 91 >=50 >=95 97
2011-2012 95 >=95 >=90 91 >=50 >=95 97
2010-2011 94 >=95 >=90 88 >=50 >=95 96


Students

Year Enrollment Year-to-year change (%)
2023-2024 23,199 -2.2
2022-2023 23,711 -2.9
2021-2022 24,390 -2.3
2020-2021 24,954 -5.4
2019-2020 26,304 -1.7
2018-2019 26,747 -2.4
2017-2018 27,378 -1.6
2016-2017 27,803 -3.2
2015-2016 28,706 -1.1
2014-2015 29,028 -2.4
2013-2014 29,731 -2.1
2012-2013 30,355 -1.7
2011-2012 30,885 -2.7
2010-2011 31,724 -2.1
2009-2010 32,387 -1.7
2008-2009 32,936 -1.9
2007-2008 33,558 -1.0
2006-2007 33,909 -2.0
2005-2006 34,592 -0.9
2004-2005 34,901 -1.3
2003-2004 35,349 -0.6
2002-2003 35,566 1.3
2001-2002 35,117 -0.2
2000-2001 35,199 1.5
1999-2000 34,657 0.0
Racial Demographics, 2023-2024
RACE Saddleback Valley Unified School District (%) California K-12 STUDENTS (%)
American Indian/Alaska Native 0.1 0.4
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander 12.8 12.1
Black 1.1 4.9
Hispanic 39.2 56.1
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.2 0.4
Two or More Races 9.2 5.8
White 37.2 20.2

Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.


Staff

As of the 2023-2024 school year, Saddleback Valley Unified School District had 1,002.97 full-time classroom teachers. The student-teacher ratio was 23.13.

Teachers, 2023-2024 school year
TYPE NUMBER OF TEACHERS
Prekindergarten: 0.00
Kindergarten: 84.57
Elementary: 551.18
Secondary: 367.22
Total: 1,002.97

Saddleback Valley Unified School District employed 16.00 district administrators and 53.85 school administrators as of the 2023-2024 school year.

Administrators, 2023-2024 school year
TYPE NUMBER OF ADMINISTRATORS
District Administrators: 16.00
District Administrative Support: 73.64
School Administrators: 53.85
School Administrative Support: 115.68
Other staff, 2023-2024 school year
TYPE NUMBER OF OTHER STAFF
Instructional Aides: 330.11
Instruc. Coordinators & Supervisors: 32.60
Total Guidance Counselors: 55.44
Elementary Guidance Counselors: 24.34
Secondary Guidance Counselors: 22.00
Librarians/Media Specialists: 1.16
Library/Media Support: 0.00
Student Support Services: 79.48
Other Support Services: 503.41


Schools

The Saddleback Valley Unified School District operates 34 schools. They are listed below in alphabetical order.
List of schools
SCHOOL NAMENUMBER OF STUDENTSGRADES
Cielo Vista Elementary488KG-6
Del Cerro Elementary381KG-6
Del Lago Elementary359KG-6
De Portola Elementary567KG-6
El Toro High1,9729-12
Esperanza Education Center777-12
Foothill Ranch Elementary1,065KG-6
Glen Yermo Elementary318KG-6
Laguna Hills High1,4019-12
Lake Forest Elementary688KG-6
La Madera Elementary602KG-6
La Paz Intermediate7077-8
La Tierra Early Childhood Center1KG-KG
Linda Vista Magnet Elementary278KG-6
Lomarena Elementary525KG-6
Los Alisos Intermediate6117-8
Melinda Heights Elementary950KG-6
Mission Viejo High1,6289-12
Montevideo Elementary456KG-6
Olivewood Elementary412KG-6
Portola Hills Elementary758KG-6
Ralph A. Gates Dli Magnet Elementary908KG-6
Rancho Canada Elementary630KG-6
Rancho Santa Margarita Intermediate1,1167-8
Robinson Elementary489KG-6
San Joaquin Elementary229KG-6
Santiago Steam Magnet Elementary497KG-6
Serrano Intermediate8877-8
Silverado High2489-12
Svusd Virtual Academy (Alternative)161KG-12
Trabuco Elementary95KG-6
Trabuco Hills High2,5079-12
Trabuco Mesa Elementary630KG-6
Valencia Elementary524KG-6

Noteworthy events

2016: Court rules test scores not required in teacher evaluations

StudentsMatter logo.jpg

Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Barry Goode ruled in September 2016 that the Saddleback Valley Unified School District, along with 12 other school districts, were not required to use student test scores in teacher evaluations. Goode's ruling went against a lawsuit filed by the group Students Matter, which sought to mandate the use of student standardized test scores in teacher evaluations. Students Matter argued that the districts' teacher contracts violated California's 1971 Stull Act, which requires school districts to evaluate teachers in a manner related to student performance. Goode concluded that all of the school districts in question were meeting their legal obligations.[8]

“The Legislature endorses many uses of those tests, including evaluating pupils, entire schools and local educational agencies,” Goode wrote in his opinion. “But it does not say the results should be used to evaluate individual teachers.”[8]

Marcellus McRae, who represented the plaintiffs, said he was surprised by the ruling. “If you really think about it, this is such a basic concept that the goal of teaching is for students to learn,” McRae said. “It is, to me, axiomatic that teacher evaluations have to be based at least in part over whether students have learned.”[8]

Students Matter won a similar case in 2012. That lawsuit had been filed against the Los Angeles Unified School District, and the school district was ultimately required to include test scores in its teacher evaluations. In the 2016 case, however, Goode ruled that school districts were allowed to decide how to use test results. “There are serious questions about whether, and the extent to which, a pupil’s standardized test score is ‘reasonably related’ and ‘applicable’ to the performance of a given teacher,” Goode said.[8]

Teachers unions supported Goode's ruling. They argued that standardized test scores overlooked external factors that inhibited student learning, such as poverty.[8]

“Every day teachers across California use a variety of benchmarks, including in-class quizzes, tests, projects, and personal observation to fine-tune their approaches with their students,” said California Federation of Teachers President Joshua Pechthalt. “There is no single method for assessing progress that is ideal or that should be used to the exclusion of all others.”[8]

Contact information

Saddleback Valley Unified School District Logos.jpeg
Saddleback Valley Unified School District
25631 Peter A. Hartman Way
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Phone: 949-586-1234


About school boards

Education legislation in California

Bills are monitored by BillTrack50 and sorted by action history.

See also

California School Board Elections News and Analysis
Seal of California.png
School Board badge.png
Ballotpedia RSS.jpg

External links

Footnotes