Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

Samuel A. Thumma

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Samuel A. Thumma
Image of Samuel A. Thumma
Arizona Court of Appeals Division One (Maricopa County)
Tenure

2012 - Present

Term ends

2027

Years in position

13

Compensation

Base salary

$200,000

Elections and appointments
Last elected

November 3, 2020

Appointed

April 11, 2012

Education

Bachelor's

Iowa State University, 1984

Law

University of Iowa College of Law, 1988

Contact

Samuel A. Thumma is a judge for Division One of the Arizona Court of Appeals. He assumed office in 2012. His current term ends on January 4, 2027.

Thumma ran for re-election for the Division One judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals. He won in the retention election on November 3, 2020.

Thumma served as the vice chief judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One.[1] He was appointed to the court by Republican Governor Jan Brewer to succeed Patrick Irvine in April 2012.[2][3][4][5][6]

Thumma was one of seven nominees for Governor Doug Ducey's first appointment to the Arizona Supreme Court. The governor's eventual appointee, Clint Bolick, succeeded Justice Rebecca White Berch, who retired in September 2015.[7]

Education

Thumma received his B.S. from Iowa State University in 1984 and his J.D. from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1988.[3]

Career

After law school, Thumma clerked in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. After his clerkship, he joined the law firm of Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C. as an associate. In 1992, Thumma served as a law clerk in the Arizona Supreme Court. In 1993, he joined the firm of Perkins Coie Brown & Bain PA in Phoenix. Thumma was appointed to the Maricopa County Superior Court in 2007 and to the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, in 2012.[3]

Awards and associations

  • Honorary Chair, American Bar Association, Litigation Section Annual Conference (2014)
  • Lifetime Fellow, Arizona Foundation for Legal Services & Education (2011)
  • American Bar Association, Litigation Section Outstanding Subcommittee Chair (2010)
  • American Red Cross National and Regional Leadership Awards (2008)
  • Rotary International, Phoenix Rotary 100 Club
  • Thurgood Marshall Inn of Court
  • State Bar of Arizona Committee on the Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Arizona Uniform State Laws Commissioner
  • Delegate, National Conference on Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
  • The Sedona Conference Judicial Advisory Board
  • Arizona Supreme Court Co-Chair Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence
  • American Law Institute
  • American Bar Foundation[3]

Elections

2020

Arizona Court of Appeals Division One (Maricopa County)

Samuel A. Thumma was retained to Division One of the Arizona Court of Appeals on November 3, 2020 with 75.3% of the vote.

Retention
 Vote
%
Votes
Yes
 
75.3
 
996,592
No
 
24.7
 
327,781
Total Votes
1,324,373

2014

Thumma was retained to the Arizona Court of Appeals with 68.1 percent of the vote on November 4, 2014. [6] 

Evaluation

The Judicial Performance Review Commission provides Arizona voters with an evaluation of each judge up for retention. The commission votes on whether a candidate meets or does not meet the JPR standards. Each judge is assessed on their legal ability, integrity, communication skills, judicial temperament and administrative performance.[8]

The commission voted that Thumma met the JPR standards. The vote was 29-0 in favor of retention.[6]

2010

Main article: Arizona judicial elections, 2010

Thumma was retained to the Maricopa County Superior Court with 62.11% of the vote in 2010.[9]

Read Thumma's Judicial Performance Report here.

Campaign themes

2020

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Samuel A. Thumma did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.

Noteworthy cases

Parents have no right to cross-examine children (2014)

In a case of first impression in Arizona, the court of appeals ruled that parents have no inherent right to cross-examine their children during removal hearings, including during a hearing to terminate parental rights.

Articles:

See also


External links

Footnotes