Your feedback ensures we stay focused on the facts that matter to you most—take our survey

San Antonio employee salaries, 2008-2011

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search



BP-Initials-UPDATED.png This article may not adhere to Ballotpedia's current article guidelines. Please email us at editor@ballotpedia.org to suggest an improvement.


San Antonio employee salaries are public records under the Texas Public Information Act.[1]

Salaries

Sunshine Review reviewed San Antonio employee salary data as of January 1 for years 2008 to 2011. There were nine employees earning over $150,000 in 2008, 19 employees in 2009 and 2010, and 22 in 2011. The total cost of the top 22 salaries in 2011 was $3,812,636.[2] The information was gathered from a letter sent by the district after Sunshine Review filed a public records request.

Year 2008 2009 2010 2011
# of employees over $150k 9 19 19 22

The following table outlines the salary of some high-paying positions in San Antonio:[2]

Name 2008 2009 2010 2011
Arthur Rodriguez $191,602 $191,602 $193,518
Ben Gorzell $152,035 $155,000 $164,477
Charles Hood $158,426 $169,705 $169,705 $171,402
David Mccary $150,725
Erik Walsh $151,794 $162,602 $162,602 $164,378
Francisca Gonzalez $158,032
Frank Miller $155,000 $156,550
Hugh Miller $150,428
Jelynne Leblanc-Burley $178,868
Majed Alghafry $171,392 $171,392 $173,205
Martha Sepeda $151,014
Michael Bernard $167,974 $181,664 $181,664 $183,580
Michael Frisbie $157,230 $157,230 $158,901
Michael Sawaya $158,627 $158,627 $160,213
Park Pearson $154,500 $160,000 $160,000
Pasquale Digiovanni $178,868 $193,445 $193,445 $195,442
Penny Postoak-Ferguson $157,851
Peter Zanoni $164,377
Ramiro Salazar $151,031
Richard Varn $165,000 $176,748 $176,748 $176,748
Roderick Sanchez $155,324 $155,324 $157,561
Scott White $173,757 $178,969
Sharon De La Garza $156,000 $156,000 $164,387
Sheryl Sculley $275,000 $295,000 $315,000 $315,000
T.C. Broadnax $156,000 $156,000 $164,378
William Mcmanus $171,290 $183,486 $183,486 $185,321
Total $1,620,977 $3,310,212 $2,998,825 $3,812,636

Information provided did not include employees by title, how many people the city employed, or total employee spending each year.

Benefits

The city provided information on monthly health coverage and retirement contribution. The following table outlines the total amount of coverage and contribution of the highest-income employees in 2011.[2]

Name Annual salary Monthly employer
health coverage
Sept. 2011
Retirement
contribution
Jan. 2011-Aug. 2011
Arthur Rodriguez $193,518 $795 $16,521
Ben Gorzell $164,477 $795 $14,128
Charles Hood $171,402 $941 $14,921
David Mccary $150,725 $941 $12,992
Erik Walsh $164,378 $822 $13,777
Frank Miller $156,550 $0 $13,475
Hugh Miller $150,428 $565 $13,094
Majed Alghafry $173,205 $795 $14,847
Martha Sepeda $151,014 $414 $13,018
Michael Bernard $183,580 $795 $15,935
Michael Frisbie $158,901 $795 $14,061
Michael Sawaya $160,213 $822 $13,777
Park Pearson $160,000 $941 $9,988
Pasquale Digiovanni $195,442 $355 $16,680
Peter Zanoni $164,377 $795 $14,120
Ramiro Salazar $151,031 $606 $13,020
Richard Varn $176,748 N/A N/A
Roderick Sanchez $157,561 $941 $13,484
Sharon De La Garza $164,387 $355 $14,121
Sheryl Sculley $315,000 $795 $20,200
T.C. Broadnax $164,378 $822 $14,120
William Mcmanus $185,321 $0 $15,730
Total $3,812,636 $14,090 $302,009

Phone use

There were 2,859 city cell phones between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2011.[2]

Car use

Total number of city personal cars between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2010:[2]

Year Cars
2008 116
2009 95
2010 84

Salary records project

In 2011, Sunshine Review chose 152 local governments as the focus of research on public employee salaries. The editors of Sunshine Review selected eight states with relevant political contexts (listed alphabetically):

1. California
2. Florida
3. Illinois
4. Michigan
5. New Jersey
6. Pennsylvania
7. Texas
8. Wisconsin

Within these states, the editors of Sunshine Review focused on the most populous cities, counties and school districts, as well as the emergency services entities within these governments. The purpose of this selection method was to develop articles on governments affecting the most citizens.

The salary information garnered from these states were a combination of existing online resources and state Freedom of Information Act requests sent out to the governments.

A study published by the Pew Charitable Trusts and the Economy League of Greater Philadelphia said the city of Philadelphia faced challenges owing to the cost of public employee pensions.[3] The report claimed the amount that Philadelphia paid to pension recipients limited the city’s ability to use its budget effectively.

The report said there were more individuals receiving pension benefits—33,907 claimants in 2006—than workers in the city—28,701.[3] The authors recommended three steps towards addressing the problem of high costs in pensions: improved data collection, expanded transparency initiatives, and reductions to the city's overall budget.[3]

Salary schedules can be published as ranges, not as specific compensation figures, and may leave out compensation received through health and retirement benefits, as well as benefits such as commuter allowances and cell phone reimbursements. This project aimed to close the gap and provide a more accurate picture of public employee salaries for the sake of public education and transparency.

See also

External links

Footnotes