Everything you need to know about ranked-choice voting in one spot. Click to learn more!

San Clemente, California, Hotel Increase, Measure OO (November 2016)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Local ballot measure elections in 2016

Measure OO: San Clemente Hotel Tax Increase
LocalBallotMeasures Final.png
The basics
Election date:
November 8, 2016
Status:
Defeatedd Defeated
Topic:
Local hotel tax
Amount: Increase from 10% to 13%
Expires in: Never
Related articles
Local hotel tax on the ballot
November 8, 2016 ballot measures in California
Orange County, California ballot measures
City tax on the ballot
See also
San Clemente, California

A hotel tax increase was on the ballot for San Clemente voters in Orange County, California, on November 8, 2016. It was defeated by a margin of eight votes.

A yes vote was a vote in favor of increasing the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from 10 to 13 percent.
A no vote was a vote against increasing the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate.

Election results

Measure OO
ResultVotesPercentage
Defeatedd No15,04350.01%
Yes 15,035 49.99%
Election results from Orange County Elections Office

Text of measure

Ballot question

The following question appeared on the ballot:[1]

Shall Ordinance No. 1627 be adopted to increase the transient occupancy tax (“TOT”) from its current rate of 10 percent to 13 percent in perpetuity, for an estimated annual increase of $570,000?[2]

Impartial analysis

The following impartial analysis of the measure was prepared by the office of the San Clemente City Attorney:

Measure OO would:

(1) increase the San Clemente’s transient occupancy tax (TOT) from the current 10 percent to 13 percent;

(2) clarify the existing scope of the definition of “hotel” in the TOT ordinance by including additional examples of structures that might constitute a “hotel” by virtue of a short-term occupancy;

(3) authorize the City Council to repeal or refine the TOT ordinance without seeking voter approval as long as the repeal or amendment does not result in an extension or increase in the tax that the voters approved.

The TOT is collected from persons who stay in hotels, motels, and similar lodging for fewer than 30 days. The existing tax is 10 percent of the hotel charge, and the passage of this measure would increase the tax by 3 percent. These taxes are collected by the hotel operator and typically transferred to the City on a quarterly basis. The TOT is a general tax, and the funds collected are authorized by law to be used for general government purposes and basic services, such as police, fire, public works, parks, and recreation programs. An increase in San Clemente’s TOT from 10 percent to 13 percent is estimated to generate an additional $570,000 in annual tax revenue.

State law requires general taxes to be approved by a majority of those voting on the tax measure. This measure has been placed on the ballot by the City Council.

A “YES” vote on the measure will increase the TOT from 10 to 13 percent, clarify the definition of “hotel” by including additional examples of structures that might be a “hotel,” and authorize the City Council to refine the TOT ordinance without voter approval as long as the changes do not result in an extension or increase in the tax.

A “NO” vote on the measure will leave the TOT rate, the “hotel” definition, and the City Council’s authority unchanged[2]

—San Clemente City Attorney[1]

Full text

The full text of the measure is available here.

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in California

This measure was put on the ballot through a vote of the governing officials of San Clemente, California.

Recent news

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms San Clemente Local hotel tax. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Orange County Registrar of Voters, "Measure OO," accessed October 12, 2016
  2. 2.0 2.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.