San Francisco, California, Proposition H, Move Local Elections to Even-Numbered Years and Change Initiative Petition Signature Requirements Amendment (November 2022)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
San Francisco Prposition H

Flag of California.png

Election date

November 8, 2022

Topic
Local election date changes
Status

ApprovedApproved

Type
Referral


San Francisco Prposition H was on the ballot as a referral in San Francisco on November 8, 2022. It was approved.

A "yes" vote supported changing elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years (in November of presidential election years) and changing signature requirements for ballot initiatives from 5% of votes cast for mayor to 2% of registered voters.

A "no" vote opposed the proposed changes, thereby continuing to hold elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer during odd-numbered years and maintaining that the basis for determining the number of signatures required for ballot initiatives shall be 5% of votes cast for mayor in the previous mayoral election.


Election results

San Francisco Prposition H

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

203,855 71.22%
No 82,391 28.78%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

Proposition H moved elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years (in November of presidential election years) and changed signature requirements for ballot initiatives from 5% of votes cast for mayor to 2% of registered voters.

The city of San Francisco, California, held general elections for mayor, city attorney, district attorney, sheriff, and treasurer on November 5, 2019. The next election for these offices was scheduled for November 2023.[1][2][3]

At the time of the election in San Francisco, ranked-choice voting was used in all elections for mayor, assessor-recorder, city attorney, district attorney, public defender, sheriff, treasurer, and the board of supervisors.[4]

As of 2022, the signature requirement to qualify an initiative for the ballot in San Francisco was 5% of the votes cast for all candidates for mayor in the last preceding general municipal election for mayor. In 2019, 177,192 votes were cast in the mayoral election, meaning the signature requirement set on the basis of votes cast was 8,860. Proposition H changed the requirement to 2% of registered voters in San Francisco. As of November 9, 2022, San Francisco had 497,561 registered voters. Two percent of that number is 9,951. Moving the elections to even-numbered years was expected to increase voter turnout in the election, meaning initiative signature requirements would increase due to increased votes in mayoral elections. Therefore, changing the signature requirement to be calculated based on the number of registered voters was designed to prevent a large increase in signature requirements from changing the date of mayoral elections.[5]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title for Prposition H was as follows:

Shall the City amend the Charter to hold elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney and Treasurer in November of presidential election years, extend the current terms of these officials by one year to January 2025, provide that there would be no regularly scheduled election in 2023, hold elections for local ballot measures only in even-numbered years or in special elections, and change the minimum number of signatures required for voters to place ordinances and declarations of policy on the ballot?

Full Text

The full text of this measure is available here.

Fiscal impact

City Controller Ben Rosenfield wrote the following fiscal impact statement for Proposition H:[5]

Should the proposed Charter amendment be approved by the voters, in my opinion, it would decrease the cost of government by approximately $6.9 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2023–2024 and in subsequent odd-numbered years, by consolidating elections and eliminating municipal elections in odd-numbered years. However, these savings would be reduced or eliminated if a special election is required in an odd-numbered year.

The proposed Charter amendment would require elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney and Treasurer to be held in even-numbered years. To do so, the amendments provides that the people elected to these offices in 2019 would serve a five-year term. The next election for these offices would be in November 2024 followed by elections for these offices every four years in even-numbered years.

These changes would save the City approximately $9 million for the cost of running general municipal elections in odd-numbered years, offset by approximately $2.1 million for the cost of printing and mailing ballot cards and voter information pamphlets, temporary staffing costs, and other materials and services that would be shifted from one year to the next, for a net savings of $6.9 million over two years beginning in FY 2023–24.

The amendment would also change the signature threshold for initiative ordinances to two percent of the last number of registered voters in San Francisco, instead of five percent of the turnout in the last mayoral election.[6]

Support

UpTheVoteSF led the Yes on H campaign.[7]

Supporters

Supporters of Proposition H included:[5][8]

  • California Common Cause
  • League of Women Voters of San Francisco
  • San Francisco Democratic Party
  • Represent.Us
  • Asian Americans Advancing Justice- Asian Law Caucus
  • Sierra Club
  • Uniting Professionals
  • San Francisco Labor Council
  • Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club
  • Former Mayor Art Agnos
  • San Francisco Latinx Democratic Club
  • San Francisco Women's Political Committee

Voter guide arguments

The supporting arguments provided for this measure in the 2022 San Francisco Voter Guide (written by California Common Cause, League of Women Voters of San Francisco, San Francisco Democratic Party, Represent.Us, Asian Americans Advancing Justice- Asian Law Caucus, and Sierra Club) were as follows:[5]

Prop H has the potential to double voter participation in San Francisco for important local offices and save the city millions of dollars.

At a time when voting rights and democracy are under attack, Prop H is a simple solution to ensure that more San Franciscans have a voice in our democracy. This non-partisan, good government measure moves the elections for Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney, and Treasurer— currently in odd years— to even years.

Yes on H updates the city Charter to align with a state law prohibiting cities from holding off-cycle elections if doing so significantly lowers voter turnout. Already 50+ cities have made this change in California, including Los Angeles, San Bruno, Modesto, and San Mateo. It’s time for San Francisco to codify the democratic ideals of our state and city!

Over the last decade, voter turnout in San Francisco has averaged 43% in odd year elections and 80% in presidential cycles; with the lowest odd-year voter participation amongst communities of color, the working class, and young voters. Prop H isn’t just about increasing voter turnout but also ensuring that more voters will have a say in city elections. Consolidating next year’s election into the 2024 ballot will save about $7 million dollars which can be spent instead on urgent needs such as homelessness, housing, and public safety. Can you imagine what our local elections would look like if more voters participated? It's time to join the other California cities who have already made this important change to increase voter participation. Please join us and Vote Yes on Prop H.

Opposition

Opponents

  • Richie Greenberg[5]

Voter guide arguments

The supporting arguments provided for this measure in the 2022 San Francisco Voter Guide (written by Richie Greenberg) were as follows:[5]

Throughout our history, San Francisco has condemned attempts by extremists around the world to seize power, exclude diverse voices and suppress the right to vote. But cancel elections right here? Unprecedented!

Proposition H was crafted by the City's most left-wing movement socialists. Standing against this ballot measure is Mayor London Breed, along with advocates and leaders across community, education, business, nonprofit and grassroots organizations. We recognize this dangerous ploy by Supervisor Dean Preston to drive like-minded radical allies into office regardless of the will of the voters.

Proposition H will simply eliminate the 2023 election for several elected offices. Everyone stays in office. Don't like the choices four years ago? Sorry! It's not up to the voters any more. What about our rights? This is voter suppression!

Earlier this year, San Francisco celebrated democracy with the School Board and District Attorney recalls (which I advocated strongly). Dean Preston and his allies staunchly opposed recalls - and would have given Chesa Boudin a five year term if he was not ousted! In San Francisco, more Chinese, Filipino, Latino and lower income voters will cast ballots in 2022 than any year in our history, due to governor Gavin Newsom's mail-in ballot executive order. 2023 will again break records if we continue the political engagement of diverse voices -- Yet Dean Preston wants to break this momentum and actually suppress the vote.

Annual elections are an important San Francisco democratic tradition that increases opportunities for citizens to vote. Vote NO on H because it undermines our democratic norms.

Background

San Francisco initiative petition requirements

Ballot measures can be put before San Francisco voters by referral from the city council or through a signature petition drive for an initiative, which proposes a new law, or a referendum, which puts a law passed by the city council before voters. San Francisco adopted the process of initiative and referendum in 1898, more than a decade before California as a whole authorized the use of initiative and referendum.[9]

Going into the election, the signature requirement to qualify an initiative for the ballot in San Francisco was 5% of the votes cast for all candidates for mayor in the last preceding general municipal election for mayor. In 2019, 177,192 votes were cast in the mayoral election, meaning the signature requirement set on the basis of votes cast was 8,860. Proposition H was designed to change the requirement to 2% of registered voters in San Francisco. As of October 25, 2022, San Francisco had 497,991 registered voters. Two percent of that number is 9,960. Moving the elections to even-numbered years was expected to increase voter turnout in the election, meaning initiative signature requirements would increase due to increased votes in mayoral elections. Therefore, changing the signature requirement to be calculated based on number of registered voters was designed to prevent a large increase in signature requirements from changing the date of mayoral elections.

Mayor, Sheriff, District Attorney, City Attorney and Treasurer elections in San Francisco

See also: Mayoral election in San Francisco, California (2019)

The city of San Francisco, California, held general elections for mayor, city attorney, district attorney, sheriff, and treasurer on November 5, 2019. The next election for these offices was scheduled for November 2023.[10][11][12]

At the time of the election in San Francisco, ranked-choice voting was used in all elections for mayor, assessor-recorder, city attorney, district attorney, public defender, sheriff, treasurer, and the board of supervisors.[13]

Local ballot measures related to election date changes

The following is a list of local ballot measures designed to move municipal election dates from odd to even-numbered years and to coincide with statewide elections on the ballot in 2022:

StateYearBallot MeasureStatusYes VotesNo Votes
California2022Arcadia Measure CAApproved 9,052 (67%)4,496 (33%)
Colorado2022Boulder Question 2EApproved 26,138 (63%)15,039 (37%)
California2022Compton Measure EDApproved 7,196 (63%)4,137 (37%)
Colorado2022Fort Collins Ballot Question 2BApproved 50,590 (76%)16,317 (24%)
Washington2022King Charter Amendment 1Approved 564,228 (69%)247,961 (31%)
California2022Long Beach Measure LBCApproved 80,644 (75%)26,307 (25%)
California2022Long Beach Unified School District Measure LBUApproved 89,106 (73%)32,289 (27%)
California2022Modesto Measure GApproved 34,310 (69%)15,721 (31%)
California2022Pomona Measure PLApproved 14,957 (75%)5,116 (25%)
California2022Redwood City Measure ZApproved 20,016 (87%)3,094 (13%)
California2022San Francisco Prposition HApproved 203,855 (71%)82,391 (29%)
California2022San Jose Measure BApproved 91,162 (55%)73,147 (45%)
Florida2022St. Petersburg Charter Amendment 1Approved 69,994 (70%)30,046 (30%)

Path to the ballot

See also: Laws governing local ballot measures in California

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted 7-4 on July 19, 2022, to place this measure on the ballot. The Supervisors voted as follows: [14]

  • Yes: Chan, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, and Stefani
  • No: Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Walton

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in California

See below to learn more about current voter registration rules, identification requirements, and poll times in California.

How to vote in California


See also


Footnotes

  1. San Francisco Board of Elections, "What’s on the Ballot?" accessed March 11, 2019
  2. San Francisco Board of Elections, "Calendar for the November 5, 2019, Municipal Election," accessed March 29, 2019
  3. San Francisco Department of Elections, "Candidates: November, 5, 2019, Consolidated Municipal Election," accessed June 12, 2019
  4. San Francisco Department of Elections, "Ranked-Choice Voting," accessed November 4, 2019
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 SF Elections, "2022 November General Election Voter Guide," accessed October 26, 2022
  6. 6.0 6.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  7. UpTheVoteSF, "Home," accessed October 26, 2022
  8. UpTheVoteSF, "Home," accessed October 26, 2022
  9. The Local Initiative in California, "Tracy M. Gordon, Public Policy Institute of California," accessed September 8, 2015
  10. San Francisco Board of Elections, "What’s on the Ballot?" accessed March 11, 2019
  11. San Francisco Board of Elections, "Calendar for the November 5, 2019, Municipal Election," accessed March 29, 2019
  12. San Francisco Department of Elections, "Candidates: November, 5, 2019, Consolidated Municipal Election," accessed June 12, 2019
  13. San Francisco Department of Elections, "Ranked-Choice Voting," accessed November 4, 2019
  14. SF Elections, "2022 General Election Voter Guide," accessed October 3, 2022
  15. California Secretary of State, "Section 3: Polling Place Hours," accessed October 29, 2025
  16. California Secretary of State, "Voter Registration," accessed October 29, 2025
  17. 17.0 17.1 California Secretary of State, "Registering to Vote," accessed October 29, 2025
  18. California Secretary of State, "Same Day Voter Registration (Conditional Voter Registration)," accessed October 29, 2025
  19. SF.gov, "Non-citizen voting rights in local Board of Education elections," accessed November 14, 2024
  20. Under federal law, the national mail voter registration application (a version of which is in use in all states with voter registration systems) requires applicants to indicate that they are U.S. citizens in order to complete an application to vote in state or federal elections, but does not require voters to provide documentary proof of citizenship. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the application "may require only the minimum amount of information necessary to prevent duplicate voter registrations and permit State officials both to determine the eligibility of the applicant to vote and to administer the voting process."
  21. Florida's law takes effect on January 1, 2027
  22. Democracy Docket, "California Governor Signs Law to Ban Local Voter ID Requirements," September 30, 2024
  23. Congress, "H.R.3295 - Help America Vote Act of 2002," accessed September 30, 2025