Election law changes? Our legislation tracker’s got you. Check it out!

Sima Patel

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sima Patel
Candidate, Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals
Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals
Tenure
2022 - Present
Term ends
2027
Years in position
4
Predecessor: Jonathan Tukel (Nonpartisan)
Compensation
Base salary
$195,625
Elections and appointments
Last election
November 8, 2022
Next election
August 4, 2026
Personal
Religion
Hindu
Contact

Sima Patel is a judge of the Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals. She assumed office on March 1, 2022. Her current term ends on January 1, 2027.

Patel is running for re-election for judge of the Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals. She declared candidacy for the primary scheduled on August 4, 2026.[source]

Elections

2026

See also: Michigan intermediate appellate court elections, 2026

General election

The primary will occur on August 4, 2026. The general election will occur on November 3, 2026. General election candidates will be added here following the primary.

Nonpartisan primary

Nonpartisan primary election for Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals (2 seats)

Incumbent Sima Patel (Nonpartisan) and incumbent Christopher Trebilcock (Nonpartisan) are running in the primary for Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals on August 4, 2026.

Candidate
Image of Sima Patel
Sima Patel (Nonpartisan)
Image of Christopher Trebilcock
Christopher Trebilcock (Nonpartisan)

Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Endorsements

Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.

2022

See also: Michigan intermediate appellate court elections, 2022

General election

Special general election for Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals

Incumbent Sima Patel defeated Michael D. Warren Jr. in the special general election for Michigan 2nd District Court of Appeals on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Sima Patel
Sima Patel (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
56.7
 
467,524
Image of Michael D. Warren Jr.
Michael D. Warren Jr. (Nonpartisan) Candidate Connection
 
43.3
 
356,424

Total votes: 823,948
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Campaign finance


Campaign themes

2026

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Sima Patel has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. If you are Sima Patel, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.

Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?

Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for.  More than 26,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.

Help improve Ballotpedia - send us candidate contact info.


2022

Candidate Connection

Sima Patel completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Patel's responses.

Expand all | Collapse all

Judge Sima Patel sits on the Michigan Court of Appeals. Before her appointment to the bench, Judge Patel was an appellate attorney, having written hundreds of briefs and argued in the Michigan Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Michigan Supreme Court during her career. In recognition of her work, she was awarded the prestigious Leaders in Law of 2021 award by Michigan Lawyers Weekly. She was also recognized for having written one of the top scholarly briefs submitted to the Michigan Supreme Court. Judge Patel is the first East-Indian and Asian American to serve on the Michigan Appellate courts.
I believe that the judiciary should work for all members of society and am committed to increasing access to justice.
A judge has an obligation to be fair and impartial to all litigants, without a finger on the scale.
Law clerk at the Michigan Supreme Court. 6 years.
The Court of Appeals is a deliberative body. To be an effective judge, you need to have respect for your colleagues and know how to work collaboratively.
I am a rule of law judge. That means I look at the statutes and rules, common law precedent, and apply and interpret them to the unique facts of each case.
I was rated by the Women Lawyers Association of Michigan and received a highly qualified rating.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.


Campaign finance summary


Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.


Sima Patel campaign contribution history
YearOfficeStatusContributionsExpenditures
2022Michigan 2nd District Court of AppealsWon general$357,681 $0
Grand total$357,681 $0
Sources: OpenSecretsFederal Election Commission ***This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).

Noteworthy Cases

Michigan Senate v. Michigan House of Representatives (2025)

On Feb. 3, 2025, the Michigan Senate and Majority Leader Sen. Winnie Brinks (D) filed a lawsuit in the Michigan Court of Claims against the Michigan House of Representatives, House Speaker Matt Hall (R), and House Clerk Scott Starr.[1] According to Brinks, she and the Senate filed the lawsuit because Hall, at the time, did not send nine bills that passed both legislative chambers to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) for potential signatures.[1]

Both legislative chambers passed the nine bills at the center of the lawsuit during the 2023-2024 legislative sessions when Democrats had a 20-18 majority in the Senate and a 56-54 majority in the House. After their passage, then-House Speaker Joseph Tate (D) enrolled the bills.[2] However, they were not presented to Whitmer for potential signatures before the start of the 2025 legislative session.[2]

When the Michigan Legislature convened for the 2025 legislative session on Jan. 8, 2025, Republicans assumed control of the House after winning a 58-52 majority in the 2024 general elections. Since there were no regularly scheduled elections for the Senate that year, Democrats maintained their 20-18 control of the chamber. Following the start of the session, the House elected Hall to serve as speaker.[3] According to The Detroit News' Beth LaBlanc, Hall then "ordered House Clerk Scott Starr to hold off on sending the last bills until a legal review could be conducted to determine what House Republicans' options were."[4]

On Feb. 25, 2025, Michigan Court of Claims Judge Sima Patel heard arguments regarding the case.[5] Brinks and the Senate claimed it was Hall's responsibility to present the bills to Whitmer for potential signatures.[5] However, Hall and the House claimed that it was Tate's responsibility to ensure Whitmer received the bills.[5]

On Feb. 27, 2025, Patel ruled that Hall should have sent the bills to Whitmer once Republicans took control of the House.[6] However, Patel said she would not force the House to send the bills, writing, "The procedures through which this takes place is a legislative function in which the Court will not interfere."[6]

See also


External links

Footnotes