Help us improve in just 2 minutes—share your thoughts in our reader survey.
South Carolina's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (June 9 Republican primary)
- Primary date: June 9
- Primary type: Open
- Registration deadline(s): May 8 (hand-delivered); May 10 (email or fax); May 11 (postmarked)
- Online registration: Yes
- Same-day registration: No
- Early voting starts: N/A
- Absentee/mail voting deadline(s): June 9 (received)
- Voter ID: Photo ID
- Poll times: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.
2022 →
← 2018
|
South Carolina's 1st Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: March 30, 2020 |
Primary: June 9, 2020 Primary runoff: June 23, 2020 General: November 3, 2020 Pre-election incumbent: Joe Cunningham (Democratic) |
How to vote |
Poll times: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Voting in South Carolina |
Race ratings |
Inside Elections: Lean Democratic Sabato's Crystal Ball: Lean Democratic |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2020 |
See also |
U.S. Senate • 1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th South Carolina elections, 2020 U.S. Congress elections, 2020 U.S. Senate elections, 2020 U.S. House elections, 2020 |
Nancy Mace defeated Chris Cox, Kathy Landing, and Brad Mole in the June 9, 2020, Republican primary for South Carolina's 1st Congressional District. Mace received 58 percent of the vote followed by Landing with 26 percent. The remaining candidates both received less than 10 percent of the vote. Mace faced incumbent Rep. Joe Cunningham (D), who ran for re-election.
The 1st District was one of 30 House Districts represented by a Democrat in 2020 that voted for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Cunningham defeated Katie Arrington (R) in 2018 to win the open seat with 50.6 percent of the vote to Arrington's 49.2 percent. In 2016, Trump defeated Hillary Clinton (D) in the 1st District, receiving 53.5 percent of the vote to Clinton's 40.4 percent.
Until Cunningham's election in 2018, the 1st District had been represented by Republicans since 1981. South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Drew McKissick emphasized the competitiveness of the general election, saying, "The road to the majority of the House of Representatives [for Republicans] runs through the 1st Congressional District." He added, "We can't win the majority without that district."[1]
Landing and Mace led in fundraising and endorsements.
Landing had been a financial planner and member of the Mount Pleasant Town Council since 2017.[2] She received endorsements from the Republican Main Street Partnership PAC, House Freedom Fund, and former South Carolina U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint (R).[3]
Mace represented District 99 in the South Carolina House of Representatives. She previously worked in public relations and as a coalitions director on President Trump's 2016 campaign.[4] Her endorsers included Americans for Prosperity, Club for Growth PAC, and U.S. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.).[5]
Chris Cox and Brad Mole also ran in the primary. Click here to learn more about what's at stake in the general election.
Click on candidate names below to view their key messages:
![]() Landing |
Mace |
This page focuses on South Carolina's 1st Congressional District Republican primary. For more in-depth information on the district's Democratic primary and the general election, see the following pages:
- South Carolina's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (June 9 Democratic primary)
- South Carolina's 1st Congressional District election, 2020
Election procedure changes in 2020
Ballotpedia provided comprehensive coverage of how election dates and procedures changed in 2020. While the majority of changes occurred as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, some changes occurred for other reasons.
South Carolina modified its primary election process as follows:
- Voting procedures: Any eligible voter may request an absentee ballot for the primary election.
For a full timeline about election modifications made in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, click here.
Candidates and election results
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House South Carolina District 1
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Nancy Mace | 57.5 | 48,411 | |
Kathy Landing ![]() | 25.9 | 21,835 | ||
Chris Cox | 9.7 | 8,179 | ||
![]() | Brad Mole ![]() | 6.9 | 5,800 |
Total votes: 84,225 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Jamison Johnson (R)
- Logan Cunningham (R)
- Phillip Norris (R)
- Mike Covert (R)
Candidate profiles
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[6] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office:
Mount Pleasant Town Council (Assumed office: 2017)
Submitted Biography: "Conservative Republican Kathy Landing is a successful job-creating businesswoman, financial planner, community leader, public servant, military wife and proud mother. She has the education and experience to win back the First Congressional District of South Carolina for conservative values and common sense solutions. Kathy has 35 years of financial planning experience and a Masters degree in financial planning. She built her business from zero to a highly successful practice, working with three generations of many families. As a result, she understands the importance of protecting taxpayers' hard-earned money, and Kathy's efforts have earned her recognition as a Who's Who of International Business and Professional Women.Kathy and her husband of 35 years, Joe are the proud parents of two grown children, Kristie and Joseph.Elected to Mount Pleasant Town Council in 2017, Kathy chairs the Town's Economic Development Committee and serves on the Finance Committee that has advanced balanced budgets with no tax increases year-after-year helping ensure the Town remains one of the most fiscally sound in the nation with a AAA bond rating.Kathy serves on the board and volunteers with numerous charities throughout the community. For more information, please visit www.kathylanding.com."
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House South Carolina District 1 in 2020.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office:
South Carolina House of Representatives (Assumed office: 2018)
Biography: Mace graduated from The Citadel, the Military College of South Carolina, in 1994 and received a master's degree in mass communication from the University of Georgia in 2004. She worked in public relations, marketing, and as a coalitions director on Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. In 2014, she began working in commercial real estate.
Show sources
Sources: YouTube, "Charleston County Republican 1st Congressional Debate," May 26, 2020, Mace's 2020 campaign website, "Protect Life," accessed June 5, 2020, YouTube, "Extraordinary," April 14, 2020; LinkedIn, "Nancy Mace," accessed June 5, 2020, Mace's 2020 campaign website, "Bio," accessed June 5, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House South Carolina District 1 in 2020.
Party: Republican Party
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Brad Mole was born and raised in Hampton County, SC. A preacher's kid, Mole married his wife, Navy veteran Lalie and settled in Bluffton, SC where they are raising their four children. Brad is a pro-life Christian who believes in the sanctity of marriage. Mole supports a free market economy, well-equipped military and borders as secured as one would want a home. Brad is campaigning to win the District 1 seat for all of the Lowcountry, based on the same local values born when Robert Smalls founded the South Carolina Republican Party following the Civil War. "
This information was current as of the candidate's run for U.S. House South Carolina District 1 in 2020.
Endorsements
Kathy Landing
- Charleston City Paper[3]
- Charleston Mercury[3]
- House Freedom Fund[3]
- Republican Main Street Partnership PAC[3]
- Former U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint (R)[7]
Nancy Mace
- The State[8]
- Americans for Prosperity[5]
- Club for Growth PAC[9]
- GOPAC[5]
- National Rifle Association[5]
- U.S. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah)[5]
- U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)[9]
- U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.)[9]
- U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.)[9]
- U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik( R-N.Y.)[5]
Campaign advertisements
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
Kathy Landing
|
|
|
|
Nancy Mace
|
|
|
Campaign finance
This section contains campaign finance figures from the Federal Election Commission covering all candidate fundraising and spending in this election.[10] It does not include information on fundraising before the current campaign cycle or on spending by satellite groups. The numbers in this section are updated as candidates file new campaign finance reports. Candidates for Congress are required to file financial reports on a quarterly basis, as well as two weeks before any primary, runoff, or general election in which they will be on the ballot and upon the termination of any campaign committees.[11] The chart below contains data from financial reports submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chris Cox | Republican Party | $121,315 | $120,791 | $524 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Kathy Landing | Republican Party | $645,779 | $645,779 | $0 | As of July 31, 2020 |
Nancy Mace | Republican Party | $5,873,154 | $5,813,666 | $59,487 | As of December 31, 2020 |
Brad Mole | Republican Party | $7,192 | $6,043 | $1,149 | As of May 20, 2020 |
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2020. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
Primaries in South Carolina
A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. South Carolina utilizes an open primary system, in which registered voters do not have to be members of a party to vote in that party's primary. Voters must take an oath affirming that they have not voted in another party's primary.[12][13]
For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article.
What's at stake in the general election?
U.S. House elections were held on November 3, 2020, and coincided with the 2020 presidential election. All 435 House districts were up for election, and the results determined control of the U.S. House in the 117th Congress.
At the time of the election, Democrats had a 232-197 advantage over Republicans. There was one Libertarian member, and there were five vacancies. Republicans needed to gain a net 21 seats to win control of the House. Democrats needed to gain seats or lose fewer than 14 net seats to keep their majority.
In the 2018 midterm election, Democrats had a net gain of 40 seats, winning a 235-200 majority in the House. Heading into the 2018 election, Republicans had a 235-193 majority with seven vacancies.
In the 25 previous House elections that coincided with a presidential election, the president's party had gained House seats in 16 elections and lost seats in nine. In years where the president's party won districts, the average gain was 18. In years where the president's party lost districts, the average loss was 27. Click here for more information on presidential partisanship and down-ballot outcomes.
General election race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Ballotpedia provides race ratings from four outlets: The Cook Political Report, Inside Elections, Sabato's Crystal Ball, and DDHQ/The Hill. Each race rating indicates if one party is perceived to have an advantage in the race and, if so, the degree of advantage:
- Safe and Solid ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge and the race is not competitive.
- Likely ratings indicate that one party has a clear edge, but an upset is possible.
- Lean ratings indicate that one party has a small edge, but the race is competitive.[14]
- Toss-up ratings indicate that neither party has an advantage.
Race ratings are informed by a number of factors, including polling, candidate quality, and election result history in the race's district or state.[15][16][17]
Race ratings: South Carolina's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
November 3, 2020 | October 27, 2020 | October 20, 2020 | October 13, 2020 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Tilt Democratic | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | Lean Democratic | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every week throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+10, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 10 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made South Carolina's 1st Congressional District the 137th most Republican nationally.[18]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 0.97. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 0.97 points toward that party.[19]
District represented by a Democrat in 2020 and won by Donald Trump in 2016
This district was one of 30 Democratic-held U.S. House districts up in 2020 that Donald Trump (R) won in the 2016 presidential election. Most were expected to be among the House's most competitive elections in 2020.
2020 Democratic-held U.S. House districts won by Donald Trump in 2016 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Incumbent | Ran in 2020? | 2018 congressional margin | 2016 presidential margin | 2012 presidential margin | ||||||||
Arizona's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+7.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+2.5 | ||||||||
Georgia's 6th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.0 | Trump+1.5 | Romney+23.3 | ||||||||
Illinois' 14th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.0 | Trump+3.9 | Romney+10 | ||||||||
Illinois' 17th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+24.2 | Trump+0.7 | Obama+17 | ||||||||
Iowa's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.1 | Trump+3.5 | Obama+13.7 | ||||||||
Iowa's 2nd | ![]() |
Retired | Democrats+5.2 | Trump+4.1 | Obama+13.1 | ||||||||
Iowa's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+2.2 | Trump+3.5 | Obama+4.2 | ||||||||
Maine's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.3 | Trump+10.3 | Obama+8.6 | ||||||||
Michigan's 8th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+3.8 | Trump+6.7 | Romney+3.1 | ||||||||
Michigan's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+6.7 | Trump+4.4 | Romney+5.4 | ||||||||
Minnesota's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.5 | Trump+1.2 | Obama+0.1 | ||||||||
Minnesota's 7th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+4.3 | Trump+30.8 | Romney+9.8 | ||||||||
Nevada's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+9.1 | Trump+1.0 | Obama+0.8 | ||||||||
New Hampshire's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+8.6 | Trump+1.6 | Obama+1.6 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.3 | Trump+6.2 | Obama+4.6 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 5th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+13.7 | Trump+1.1 | Romney+3.0 | ||||||||
New Jersey's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+14.6 | Trump+0.9 | Romney+5.8 | ||||||||
New Mexico's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.9 | Trump+10.2 | Romney+6.8 | ||||||||
New York's 11th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+6.5 | Trump+9.8 | Obama+4.3 | ||||||||
New York's 18th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+10.9 | Trump+1.9 | Obama+4.3 | ||||||||
New York's 19th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+5.2 | Trump+6.8 | Obama+6.2 | ||||||||
New York's 22nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.8 | Trump+15.5 | Romney+0.4 | ||||||||
Oklahoma's 5th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.4 | Trump+13.4 | Romney+18.4 | ||||||||
Pennsylvania's 8th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+9.3 | Trump+9.6 | Obama+11.9 | ||||||||
Pennsylvania's 17th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+12.5 | Trump+2.6 | Romney+4.5 | ||||||||
South Carolina's 1st | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.4 | Trump+13.1 | Romney+18.1 | ||||||||
Utah's 4th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+0.3 | Trump+6.7 | Romney+37.0 | ||||||||
Virginia's 2nd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+2.2 | Trump+3.4 | Romney+2.3 | ||||||||
Virginia's 7th | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+1.9 | Trump+6.5 | Romney+10.5 | ||||||||
Wisconsin's 3rd | ![]() |
Yes | Democrats+19.3 | Trump+4.5 | Obama+11 | ||||||||
Source: Sabato's Crystal Ball and Daily Kos |
Click here to see the five U.S. House districts represented by a Republican in 2020 and won by Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Five of 46 South Carolina counties—10.9 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Barnwell County, South Carolina | 5.16% | 5.33% | 1.65% | ||||
Calhoun County, South Carolina | 2.83% | 4.31% | 3.55% | ||||
Chester County, South Carolina | 4.83% | 10.58% | 8.30% | ||||
Colleton County, South Carolina | 8.49% | 0.19% | 0.53% | ||||
McCormick County, South Carolina | 3.32% | 3.60% | 6.08% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won South Carolina with 54.9 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 40.7 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, South Carolina cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 53.3 percent of the time. In that same time frame, South Carolina supported Democratic candidates for president more often than Republican candidates, 53.3 to 43.3 percent. South Carolina favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in South Carolina. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns show the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns show the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[20][21]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 39 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 32.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 38 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 28.3 points. Clinton won one district controlled by a Republican heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 85 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 28.7 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 86 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 30.1 points. Trump won seven districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 23.28% | 75.15% | R+51.9 | 18.61% | 77.65% | R+59 | R |
2 | 31.79% | 66.50% | R+34.7 | 28.17% | 66.98% | R+38.8 | R |
3 | 35.60% | 61.95% | R+26.4 | 33.39% | 58.53% | R+25.1 | R |
4 | 17.87% | 80.08% | R+62.2 | 12.86% | 83.53% | R+70.7 | R |
5 | 23.85% | 74.46% | R+50.6 | 20.85% | 74.77% | R+53.9 | R |
6 | 30.99% | 67.41% | R+36.4 | 27.78% | 67.13% | R+39.3 | R |
7 | 32.32% | 66.10% | R+33.8 | 23.98% | 73.09% | R+49.1 | R |
8 | 33.75% | 64.76% | R+31 | 28.69% | 68.03% | R+39.3 | R |
9 | 35.55% | 63.02% | R+27.5 | 32.29% | 63.27% | R+31 | R |
10 | 22.06% | 76.34% | R+54.3 | 20.11% | 75.76% | R+55.6 | R |
11 | 41.13% | 57.49% | R+16.4 | 32.52% | 65.04% | R+32.5 | R |
12 | 59.39% | 39.69% | D+19.7 | 53.79% | 43.46% | D+10.3 | D |
13 | 32.85% | 65.84% | R+33 | 30.28% | 65.63% | R+35.3 | R |
14 | 36.82% | 61.80% | R+25 | 29.74% | 67.30% | R+37.6 | R |
15 | 48.83% | 49.47% | R+0.6 | 45.11% | 49.55% | R+4.4 | R |
16 | 41.69% | 56.82% | R+15.1 | 36.19% | 59.30% | R+23.1 | R |
17 | 21.18% | 76.65% | R+55.5 | 18.81% | 75.94% | R+57.1 | R |
18 | 25.25% | 72.79% | R+47.5 | 23.48% | 71.10% | R+47.6 | R |
19 | 35.02% | 62.85% | R+27.8 | 34.74% | 59.59% | R+24.9 | R |
20 | 27.09% | 70.82% | R+43.7 | 28.31% | 64.69% | R+36.4 | R |
21 | 25.57% | 72.91% | R+47.3 | 29.67% | 64.13% | R+34.5 | R |
22 | 32.91% | 65.01% | R+32.1 | 35.65% | 56.13% | R+20.5 | R |
23 | 64.77% | 33.12% | D+31.6 | 60.89% | 32.19% | D+28.7 | D |
24 | 35.96% | 62.42% | R+26.5 | 39.48% | 53.84% | R+14.4 | R |
25 | 71.10% | 27.86% | D+43.2 | 65.40% | 31.14% | D+34.3 | D |
26 | 35.32% | 62.83% | R+27.5 | 36.60% | 57.21% | R+20.6 | R |
27 | 36.38% | 62.10% | R+25.7 | 35.80% | 58.61% | R+22.8 | R |
28 | 34.06% | 64.37% | R+30.3 | 32.48% | 62.53% | R+30.1 | R |
29 | 33.75% | 64.90% | R+31.2 | 26.63% | 70.63% | R+44 | R |
30 | 34.61% | 64.30% | R+29.7 | 27.30% | 70.23% | R+42.9 | R |
31 | 79.20% | 19.94% | D+59.3 | 72.36% | 24.44% | D+47.9 | D |
32 | 35.50% | 63.00% | R+27.5 | 32.93% | 62.60% | R+29.7 | R |
33 | 30.03% | 68.55% | R+38.5 | 25.34% | 71.30% | R+46 | R |
34 | 42.65% | 56.21% | R+13.6 | 41.00% | 54.57% | R+13.6 | R |
35 | 27.40% | 71.15% | R+43.8 | 27.02% | 67.92% | R+40.9 | R |
36 | 38.11% | 60.33% | R+22.2 | 31.58% | 64.35% | R+32.8 | R |
37 | 33.05% | 65.49% | R+32.4 | 29.64% | 65.82% | R+36.2 | R |
38 | 23.88% | 74.78% | R+50.9 | 18.90% | 77.70% | R+58.8 | R |
39 | 32.81% | 65.88% | R+33.1 | 27.32% | 69.52% | R+42.2 | R |
40 | 42.28% | 56.63% | R+14.4 | 36.99% | 59.60% | R+22.6 | R |
41 | 63.72% | 35.30% | D+28.4 | 61.23% | 35.98% | D+25.3 | D |
42 | 44.12% | 54.53% | R+10.4 | 37.44% | 59.80% | R+22.4 | D |
43 | 44.83% | 53.97% | R+9.1 | 35.08% | 61.58% | R+26.5 | R |
44 | 46.57% | 52.34% | R+5.8 | 38.98% | 58.42% | R+19.4 | D |
45 | 35.40% | 63.31% | R+27.9 | 34.76% | 60.44% | R+25.7 | R |
46 | 41.87% | 56.57% | R+14.7 | 40.05% | 53.52% | R+13.5 | R |
47 | 31.57% | 67.02% | R+35.4 | 26.48% | 68.76% | R+42.3 | R |
48 | 35.74% | 62.60% | R+26.9 | 35.12% | 59.40% | R+24.3 | R |
49 | 66.67% | 32.40% | D+34.3 | 61.82% | 34.84% | D+27 | D |
50 | 63.30% | 35.70% | D+27.6 | 58.24% | 39.47% | D+18.8 | D |
51 | 73.57% | 25.50% | D+48.1 | 71.54% | 26.14% | D+45.4 | D |
52 | 41.47% | 57.24% | R+15.8 | 37.04% | 59.07% | R+22 | D |
53 | 47.26% | 51.83% | R+4.6 | 39.48% | 58.10% | R+18.6 | R |
54 | 58.26% | 40.99% | D+17.3 | 53.53% | 44.66% | D+8.9 | D |
55 | 56.03% | 43.25% | D+12.8 | 48.68% | 49.42% | R+0.7 | D |
56 | 41.06% | 57.56% | R+16.5 | 32.30% | 64.06% | R+31.8 | R |
57 | 62.48% | 36.64% | D+25.8 | 57.73% | 40.44% | D+17.3 | D |
58 | 33.03% | 66.09% | R+33.1 | 28.08% | 69.29% | R+41.2 | R |
59 | 70.58% | 28.54% | D+42 | 67.55% | 30.01% | D+37.5 | D |
60 | 38.35% | 60.80% | R+22.5 | 34.96% | 62.74% | R+27.8 | R |
61 | 51.91% | 47.23% | D+4.7 | 45.72% | 52.23% | R+6.5 | D |
62 | 65.60% | 33.61% | D+32 | 61.45% | 36.39% | D+25.1 | D |
63 | 34.43% | 64.43% | R+30 | 35.35% | 60.23% | R+24.9 | R |
64 | 58.22% | 40.98% | D+17.2 | 53.18% | 45.00% | D+8.2 | D |
65 | 31.75% | 67.08% | R+35.3 | 27.25% | 69.53% | R+42.3 | R |
66 | 72.57% | 26.70% | D+45.9 | 68.93% | 29.57% | D+39.4 | D |
67 | 37.94% | 61.07% | R+23.1 | 35.62% | 60.53% | R+24.9 | R |
68 | 33.20% | 65.40% | R+32.2 | 28.04% | 68.23% | R+40.2 | R |
69 | 31.53% | 66.96% | R+35.4 | 30.88% | 62.14% | R+31.3 | R |
70 | 73.89% | 25.16% | D+48.7 | 70.02% | 27.11% | D+42.9 | D |
71 | 34.78% | 63.68% | R+28.9 | 34.96% | 58.73% | R+23.8 | R |
72 | 68.08% | 29.85% | D+38.2 | 69.16% | 24.22% | D+44.9 | D |
73 | 80.11% | 18.83% | D+61.3 | 77.42% | 18.47% | D+58.9 | D |
74 | 81.27% | 17.11% | D+64.2 | 78.82% | 16.24% | D+62.6 | D |
75 | 42.45% | 55.85% | R+13.4 | 47.88% | 45.26% | D+2.6 | R |
76 | 77.22% | 21.70% | D+55.5 | 76.59% | 19.75% | D+56.8 | D |
77 | 69.65% | 29.43% | D+40.2 | 67.21% | 29.11% | D+38.1 | D |
78 | 49.92% | 48.75% | D+1.2 | 52.86% | 41.64% | D+11.2 | D |
79 | 72.59% | 26.57% | D+46 | 70.85% | 24.80% | D+46.1 | D |
80 | 59.84% | 38.87% | D+21 | 55.10% | 40.89% | D+14.2 | D |
81 | 29.68% | 68.58% | R+38.9 | 29.88% | 64.05% | R+34.2 | R |
82 | 59.20% | 39.93% | D+19.3 | 54.84% | 42.65% | D+12.2 | D |
83 | 28.62% | 69.81% | R+41.2 | 29.03% | 66.20% | R+37.2 | R |
84 | 34.77% | 64.20% | R+29.4 | 31.33% | 65.32% | R+34 | R |
85 | 30.93% | 67.51% | R+36.6 | 31.43% | 62.49% | R+31.1 | R |
86 | 38.58% | 60.04% | R+21.5 | 34.38% | 61.86% | R+27.5 | R |
87 | 20.64% | 78.04% | R+57.4 | 20.68% | 73.42% | R+52.7 | R |
88 | 27.08% | 71.09% | R+44 | 25.84% | 68.79% | R+42.9 | R |
89 | 38.55% | 59.55% | R+21 | 38.45% | 55.10% | R+16.6 | R |
90 | 52.50% | 46.54% | D+6 | 46.55% | 51.10% | R+4.5 | D |
91 | 63.50% | 35.77% | D+27.7 | 58.70% | 39.27% | D+19.4 | D |
92 | 36.52% | 61.43% | R+24.9 | 34.38% | 59.77% | R+25.4 | R |
93 | 59.26% | 39.77% | D+19.5 | 53.51% | 44.10% | D+9.4 | D |
94 | 36.52% | 61.86% | R+25.3 | 34.95% | 58.59% | R+23.6 | R |
95 | 71.56% | 27.77% | D+43.8 | 68.97% | 29.07% | D+39.9 | D |
96 | 29.83% | 68.33% | R+38.5 | 24.42% | 71.46% | R+47 | R |
97 | 42.47% | 56.02% | R+13.5 | 37.05% | 58.73% | R+21.7 | D |
98 | 40.02% | 58.27% | R+18.3 | 38.80% | 54.78% | R+16 | R |
99 | 32.05% | 66.30% | R+34.3 | 35.35% | 58.14% | R+22.8 | R |
100 | 33.71% | 64.76% | R+31 | 30.44% | 64.82% | R+34.4 | R |
101 | 66.78% | 32.31% | D+34.5 | 62.75% | 35.67% | D+27.1 | D |
102 | 60.06% | 38.77% | D+21.3 | 54.07% | 43.50% | D+10.6 | D |
103 | 62.63% | 36.59% | D+26 | 58.02% | 39.82% | D+18.2 | D |
104 | 33.50% | 65.34% | R+31.8 | 28.73% | 68.55% | R+39.8 | R |
105 | 32.43% | 66.37% | R+33.9 | 27.34% | 69.47% | R+42.1 | R |
106 | 31.29% | 67.43% | R+36.1 | 26.95% | 69.91% | R+43 | R |
107 | 37.67% | 60.99% | R+23.3 | 35.21% | 61.33% | R+26.1 | R |
108 | 35.01% | 63.87% | R+28.9 | 33.02% | 62.98% | R+30 | R |
109 | 71.24% | 27.67% | D+43.6 | 68.57% | 27.36% | D+41.2 | D |
110 | 37.37% | 60.72% | R+23.3 | 43.15% | 48.70% | R+5.5 | R |
111 | 78.60% | 19.54% | D+59.1 | 75.33% | 18.53% | D+56.8 | D |
112 | 35.27% | 63.41% | R+28.1 | 38.92% | 54.10% | R+15.2 | R |
113 | 73.23% | 25.55% | D+47.7 | 67.01% | 27.72% | D+39.3 | D |
114 | 38.05% | 60.14% | R+22.1 | 38.63% | 53.60% | R+15 | R |
115 | 40.78% | 57.26% | R+16.5 | 44.68% | 47.55% | R+2.9 | R |
116 | 53.66% | 45.16% | D+8.5 | 49.15% | 46.69% | D+2.5 | D |
117 | 48.43% | 49.82% | R+1.4 | 45.56% | 47.89% | R+2.3 | R |
118 | 42.55% | 56.44% | R+13.9 | 40.94% | 54.97% | R+14 | R |
119 | 48.34% | 49.63% | R+1.3 | 48.31% | 43.53% | D+4.8 | D |
120 | 36.27% | 62.73% | R+26.5 | 36.77% | 59.01% | R+22.2 | R |
121 | 64.89% | 34.33% | D+30.6 | 60.68% | 36.22% | D+24.5 | D |
122 | 61.99% | 37.22% | D+24.8 | 56.78% | 41.26% | D+15.5 | D |
123 | 34.41% | 64.63% | R+30.2 | 39.14% | 56.59% | R+17.5 | R |
124 | 37.53% | 61.16% | R+23.6 | 38.63% | 56.17% | R+17.5 | R |
Total | 44.09% | 54.56% | R+10.5 | 40.67% | 54.94% | R+14.3 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
District election history
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House South Carolina District 1
Joe Cunningham defeated Katie Arrington in the general election for U.S. House South Carolina District 1 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Joe Cunningham (D) | 50.6 | 145,455 |
![]() | Katie Arrington (R) | 49.2 | 141,473 | |
Other/Write-in votes | 0.2 | 505 |
Total votes: 287,433 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House South Carolina District 1
Joe Cunningham defeated Toby Smith in the Democratic primary for U.S. House South Carolina District 1 on June 12, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Joe Cunningham | 71.5 | 23,493 |
![]() | Toby Smith | 28.5 | 9,366 |
Total votes: 32,859 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House South Carolina District 1
Katie Arrington defeated incumbent Mark Sanford and Dimitri Cherny in the Republican primary for U.S. House South Carolina District 1 on June 12, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | Katie Arrington | 50.6 | 33,153 |
![]() | Mark Sanford | 46.5 | 30,496 | |
![]() | Dimitri Cherny | 2.9 | 1,932 |
Total votes: 65,581 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2016
Heading into the election, Ballotpedia rated this race as safely Republican. Incumbent Mark Sanford (R) defeated Dimitri Cherny (D), Michael Grier Jr. (Libertarian), and Albert Travison (American) in the general election on November 8, 2016. Sanford defeated Jenny Horne in the Republican primary on June 14, 2016.[22][23]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
58.6% | 190,410 | |
Democratic | Dimitri Cherny | 36.8% | 119,799 | |
Libertarian | Michael Grier Jr. | 3.6% | 11,614 | |
American | Albert Travison | 0.9% | 2,774 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0.2% | 593 | |
Total Votes | 325,190 | |||
Source: South Carolina Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
55.6% | 21,299 | ||
Jenny Horne | 44.4% | 17,001 | ||
Total Votes | 38,300 | |||
Source: South Carolina Secretary of State |
2014
Mark Sanford won re-election to the U.S. House on November 4, 2014. He did not face a primary challenger, and he did not face a Democratic challenger in the general election.
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | ![]() |
93.4% | 119,392 | |
N/A | Write-in | 6.6% | 8,423 | |
Total Votes | 127,815 | |||
Source: South Carolina State Election Commission |
See also
- South Carolina's 1st Congressional District election, 2020 (June 9 Democratic primary)
- South Carolina's 1st Congressional District election, 2020
- United States House elections in South Carolina, 2020 (June 9 Democratic primaries)
- United States House elections in South Carolina, 2020 (June 9 Republican primaries)
- United States House Democratic Party primaries, 2020
- United States House Republican Party primaries, 2020
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2020
- U.S. House battlegrounds, 2020
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ The State, "Who will face Cunningham in November? SC’s 4-way House race leaves Republicans anxious," May 31, 2020
- ↑ Landing's 2020 campaign website, "Meet Kathy," accessed June 6, 2020
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Landing's 2020 campaign website, "Endorsements," accessed June 5, 2020
- ↑ Mace's 2020 campaign website, "Bio," accessed June 6, 2020
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 'Mace's 2020 campaign website, "Nancy Mace Adds Over 50 Local Endorsements," accessed June 5, 2020
- ↑ Candidate Connection surveys completed before September 26, 2019, were not used to generate candidate profiles. In battleground primaries, Ballotpedia based its selection of noteworthy candidates on polling, fundraising, and noteworthy endorsements. In battleground general elections, all major party candidates and any other candidates with the potential to impact the outcome of the race were included.
- ↑ The Post and Courier, "Former U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint endorses Kathy Landing in South Carolina’s top House race," April 21, 2020
- ↑ Facebook, "Nancy Mace," June 1, 2020
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 The Post and Courier, "Steve Scalise, the No. 2 House Republican, endorses Nancy Mace in SC congressional race," April 22, 2020
- ↑ Fundraising by primary candidates can be found on the race's respective primary election page. Fundraising by general election candidates can be found on the race's general election page.
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "2022 Quarterly Reports," accessed March 2, 2022
- ↑ NCSL,"State Primary Election Types," accessed September 24, 2024
- ↑ South Carolina Legislature,"South Carolina Code of Laws Unannotated § 7-9-10," accessed September 24, 2024
- ↑ Inside Elections also uses Tilt ratings to indicate an even smaller advantage and greater competitiveness.
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Nathan Gonzalez," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Kyle Kondik," April 19, 2018
- ↑ Amee LaTour, "Email correspondence with Charlie Cook," April 22, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ South Carolina Election Commission, "Candidate Listing for the 11/8/2016 Statewide General Election," accessed March 31, 2016
- ↑ The New York Times, "South Carolina Primary Results," June 14, 2016