Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
South Carolina's 4th Congressional District election (June 26, 2018 Republican primary runoff)
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: Oct. 17
- Early voting: N/A
- Absentee voting deadline: Nov. 6
- Online registration: Yes
- Same-day registration: No
- Voter ID: Photo ID required
- Poll times: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
2020 →
← 2016
|
South Carolina's 4th Congressional District |
---|
Democratic primary Republican primary General election |
Election details |
Filing deadline: March 30, 2018 |
Primary: June 12, 2018 Primary runoff: June 26, 2018 (if needed) General: November 6, 2018 Pre-election incumbent: Trey Gowdy (Republican) |
How to vote |
Poll times: 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Voting in South Carolina |
Race ratings |
Cook Political Report: Solid Republican Inside Elections: Solid Republican Sabato's Crystal Ball: Safe Republican |
Ballotpedia analysis |
U.S. Senate battlegrounds U.S. House battlegrounds Federal and state primary competitiveness Ballotpedia's Election Analysis Hub, 2018 |
See also |
1st • 2nd • 3rd • 4th • 5th • 6th • 7th South Carolina elections, 2018 U.S. Congress elections, 2018 U.S. Senate elections, 2018 U.S. House elections, 2018 |
This page covers the June 26 runoff election. Click here for Ballotpedia's coverage of the June 12 primary election. |
---|
State Sen. William Timmons (R) defeated former state Sen. Lee Bright (R) in the Republican primary runoff for South Carolina's 4th congressional district, receiving 54.3 percent of the vote to Bright's 45.7 percent.[1] Timmons and Bright were the top two finishers in the June 12th Republican primary for the U.S. House seat representing South Carolina's 4th Congressional District, which was vacated by outgoing Rep. Trey Gowdy (R). Because no candidate received more than 50 percent of the vote, Bright and Timmons advanced to a June 26 runoff.
Bright, who was running a Trump-style campaign, was endorsed by Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Steve King (R-Iowa) ahead of the June 12 primary. He since gained endorsements from Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tx.) and the Club for Growth PAC.
Timmons highlighted his personal and commercial ties to the Greenville area in his run.[2] He was backed by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) in the June 12 primary. Timmons led the 13-candidate primary field in fundraising and has received support from the Conservative Leadership Alliance.
South Carolina voter? Dates you need to know. | |
---|---|
Primary election | June 12, 2018 |
Candidate filing deadline | March 30, 2018 |
Registration deadline | May 11, 2018 |
Absentee application deadline | June 8, 2018 |
General election | November 6, 2018 |
Voting information | |
Primary type | Open |
Polling locations: Go to this page to find early voting locations and your assigned precinct for election day. |
For more on related elections, please see:
- South Carolina's 4th Congressional District election (June 12, 2018 Democratic primary)
- South Carolina's 4th Congressional District election, 2018
- United States House Democratic Party primaries, 2018
- United States House Republican Party primaries, 2018
- Democratic Party primaries in South Carolina, 2018
- Republican Party primaries in South Carolina, 2018
Election results
Republican primary runoff election
Republican primary runoff for U.S. House South Carolina District 4
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | ![]() | William Timmons | 54.3 | 37,096 |
![]() | Lee Bright | 45.7 | 31,236 |
Total votes: 68,332 | ||||
![]() | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Candidates
Republican primary candidates
- Dan Albert
- Barry Bell
- Lee Bright ✔
- Stephen Brown
- Mark Burns
- James Epley
- Dan Hamilton
- Josh Kimbrell
- John Marshall Mosser
- Shannon Pierce
- Justin David Sanders
- Claude Schmid
- William Timmons ✔
Did not make the ballot:
Republican Party factional conflict
Disputes between potential members of the House Freedom Caucus and other members of the Republican Party occurred in U.S. House primaries in 2018.
In 2015, conservative Republicans formed the Freedom Caucus and began opposing House Republican leaders on fiscal policy, chamber procedures, and caucus leadership, among other things.[3] Members of the Freedom Caucus broke away from the Republican Study Committee, which, along with the Republican Main Street Partnership, was more closely aligned with House Republican leaders.[4]
In this primary, Lee Bright affiliated with the Freedom Caucus.[5][6]
The chart below shows a scorecard for how the Freedom Caucus performed in competitive Republican primaries that featured at least one Freedom Caucus candidate and one Republican opponent not affiliated with the group.
U.S. House Republican factions | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Faction | Primary victories in 2018 | Seats held prior to primaries | Performance | |||||||||
Affiliated with the House Freedom Caucus | 8 | 6 | +2 | |||||||||
Not affiliated with the House Freedom Caucus[7] | 10 | 12 | -2 |
Endorsements
- Lee Bright
- Rep. Steve King (R-IA)[8]
- Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY)[8]
- Sen. Ted Cruz (R)[9]
- Club for Growth PAC[10]
- William Timmons
- Sen. Marco Rubio (R)[11]
Campaign finance
The table below contains data from FEC Quarterly April 2018 reports, indicating candidates' cumulative raising and spending between the beginning of the campaign cycle on January 1, 2017, and the end of the reporting period on March 31, 2018. It includes only candidates who reported at least $10,000 in campaign contributions as of March 31, 2018.[12]
Satellite spending
Conservative Leadership Alliance
The Conservative Leadership Alliance is a 501(c)(4) organization which describes its purpose as "to put conservative policies into action. That includes advocating for reforms that grow the economy, lower our national debt, fix a broken healthcare system, and make our country safer and stronger through a bold national defense."[13] The group allocated $200,000 following the June 12 primary to run ads in opposition to the campaign of Lee Bright (R).[14]
Club for Growth PAC
- See also: Club for Growth PAC
The Club for Growth PAC is a political action committee (PAC) that "endorses and raises money for candidates who stay true to the fundamental principles of limited government and economic freedom."[15] The PAC is one of the political arms of the Club for Growth (CFG). The group, according to the PAC, focuses on House and Senate races.[16] The organization spent $230,000 on a digital and television ad campaign opposed to the candidacy of William Timmons (R).[17]
Campaign tactics and strategies
Campaign advertisements
Lee Bright
Support
|
William Timmons
Support
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oppose
|
|
|
Race ratings
- See also: Race rating definitions and methods
Race ratings: South Carolina's 4th Congressional District election, 2018 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Race tracker | Race ratings | ||||||||
October 30, 2018 | October 23, 2018 | October 16, 2018 | October 9, 2018 | ||||||
The Cook Political Report | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | |||||
Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | Solid Republican | |||||
Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball | Safe Republican | Safe Republican | Safe Republican | Safe Republican | |||||
Note: Ballotpedia updates external race ratings every two weeks throughout the election season. |
District analysis
- See also: The Cook Political Report's Partisan Voter Index
- See also: FiveThirtyEight's elasticity scores
The 2017 Cook Partisan Voter Index for this district was R+15, meaning that in the previous two presidential elections, this district's results were 15 percentage points more Republican than the national average. This made South Carolina's 4th Congressional District the 83rd most Republican nationally.[18]
FiveThirtyEight's September 2018 elasticity score for states and congressional districts measured "how sensitive it is to changes in the national political environment." This district's elasticity score was 1.01. This means that for every 1 point the national political mood moved toward a party, the district was expected to move 1.01 points toward that party.[19]
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Five of 46 South Carolina counties—10.9 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Barnwell County, South Carolina | 5.16% | 5.33% | 1.65% | ||||
Calhoun County, South Carolina | 2.83% | 4.31% | 3.55% | ||||
Chester County, South Carolina | 4.83% | 10.58% | 8.30% | ||||
Colleton County, South Carolina | 8.49% | 0.19% | 0.53% | ||||
McCormick County, South Carolina | 3.32% | 3.60% | 6.08% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won South Carolina with 54.9 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 40.7 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, South Carolina cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 53.3 percent of the time. In that same time frame, South Carolina supported Democratic candidates for president more often than Republican candidates, 53.3 to 43.3 percent. South Carolina favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in South Carolina. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns show the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns show the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[20][21]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 39 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 32.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 38 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 28.3 points. Clinton won one district controlled by a Republican heading into the 2018 elections. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 85 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 28.7 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 86 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 30.1 points. Trump won seven districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
1 | 23.28% | 75.15% | R+51.9 | 18.61% | 77.65% | R+59 | R |
2 | 31.79% | 66.50% | R+34.7 | 28.17% | 66.98% | R+38.8 | R |
3 | 35.60% | 61.95% | R+26.4 | 33.39% | 58.53% | R+25.1 | R |
4 | 17.87% | 80.08% | R+62.2 | 12.86% | 83.53% | R+70.7 | R |
5 | 23.85% | 74.46% | R+50.6 | 20.85% | 74.77% | R+53.9 | R |
6 | 30.99% | 67.41% | R+36.4 | 27.78% | 67.13% | R+39.3 | R |
7 | 32.32% | 66.10% | R+33.8 | 23.98% | 73.09% | R+49.1 | R |
8 | 33.75% | 64.76% | R+31 | 28.69% | 68.03% | R+39.3 | R |
9 | 35.55% | 63.02% | R+27.5 | 32.29% | 63.27% | R+31 | R |
10 | 22.06% | 76.34% | R+54.3 | 20.11% | 75.76% | R+55.6 | R |
11 | 41.13% | 57.49% | R+16.4 | 32.52% | 65.04% | R+32.5 | R |
12 | 59.39% | 39.69% | D+19.7 | 53.79% | 43.46% | D+10.3 | D |
13 | 32.85% | 65.84% | R+33 | 30.28% | 65.63% | R+35.3 | R |
14 | 36.82% | 61.80% | R+25 | 29.74% | 67.30% | R+37.6 | R |
15 | 48.83% | 49.47% | R+0.6 | 45.11% | 49.55% | R+4.4 | R |
16 | 41.69% | 56.82% | R+15.1 | 36.19% | 59.30% | R+23.1 | R |
17 | 21.18% | 76.65% | R+55.5 | 18.81% | 75.94% | R+57.1 | R |
18 | 25.25% | 72.79% | R+47.5 | 23.48% | 71.10% | R+47.6 | R |
19 | 35.02% | 62.85% | R+27.8 | 34.74% | 59.59% | R+24.9 | R |
20 | 27.09% | 70.82% | R+43.7 | 28.31% | 64.69% | R+36.4 | R |
21 | 25.57% | 72.91% | R+47.3 | 29.67% | 64.13% | R+34.5 | R |
22 | 32.91% | 65.01% | R+32.1 | 35.65% | 56.13% | R+20.5 | R |
23 | 64.77% | 33.12% | D+31.6 | 60.89% | 32.19% | D+28.7 | D |
24 | 35.96% | 62.42% | R+26.5 | 39.48% | 53.84% | R+14.4 | R |
25 | 71.10% | 27.86% | D+43.2 | 65.40% | 31.14% | D+34.3 | D |
26 | 35.32% | 62.83% | R+27.5 | 36.60% | 57.21% | R+20.6 | R |
27 | 36.38% | 62.10% | R+25.7 | 35.80% | 58.61% | R+22.8 | R |
28 | 34.06% | 64.37% | R+30.3 | 32.48% | 62.53% | R+30.1 | R |
29 | 33.75% | 64.90% | R+31.2 | 26.63% | 70.63% | R+44 | R |
30 | 34.61% | 64.30% | R+29.7 | 27.30% | 70.23% | R+42.9 | R |
31 | 79.20% | 19.94% | D+59.3 | 72.36% | 24.44% | D+47.9 | D |
32 | 35.50% | 63.00% | R+27.5 | 32.93% | 62.60% | R+29.7 | R |
33 | 30.03% | 68.55% | R+38.5 | 25.34% | 71.30% | R+46 | R |
34 | 42.65% | 56.21% | R+13.6 | 41.00% | 54.57% | R+13.6 | R |
35 | 27.40% | 71.15% | R+43.8 | 27.02% | 67.92% | R+40.9 | R |
36 | 38.11% | 60.33% | R+22.2 | 31.58% | 64.35% | R+32.8 | R |
37 | 33.05% | 65.49% | R+32.4 | 29.64% | 65.82% | R+36.2 | R |
38 | 23.88% | 74.78% | R+50.9 | 18.90% | 77.70% | R+58.8 | R |
39 | 32.81% | 65.88% | R+33.1 | 27.32% | 69.52% | R+42.2 | R |
40 | 42.28% | 56.63% | R+14.4 | 36.99% | 59.60% | R+22.6 | R |
41 | 63.72% | 35.30% | D+28.4 | 61.23% | 35.98% | D+25.3 | D |
42 | 44.12% | 54.53% | R+10.4 | 37.44% | 59.80% | R+22.4 | D |
43 | 44.83% | 53.97% | R+9.1 | 35.08% | 61.58% | R+26.5 | R |
44 | 46.57% | 52.34% | R+5.8 | 38.98% | 58.42% | R+19.4 | D |
45 | 35.40% | 63.31% | R+27.9 | 34.76% | 60.44% | R+25.7 | R |
46 | 41.87% | 56.57% | R+14.7 | 40.05% | 53.52% | R+13.5 | R |
47 | 31.57% | 67.02% | R+35.4 | 26.48% | 68.76% | R+42.3 | R |
48 | 35.74% | 62.60% | R+26.9 | 35.12% | 59.40% | R+24.3 | R |
49 | 66.67% | 32.40% | D+34.3 | 61.82% | 34.84% | D+27 | D |
50 | 63.30% | 35.70% | D+27.6 | 58.24% | 39.47% | D+18.8 | D |
51 | 73.57% | 25.50% | D+48.1 | 71.54% | 26.14% | D+45.4 | D |
52 | 41.47% | 57.24% | R+15.8 | 37.04% | 59.07% | R+22 | D |
53 | 47.26% | 51.83% | R+4.6 | 39.48% | 58.10% | R+18.6 | R |
54 | 58.26% | 40.99% | D+17.3 | 53.53% | 44.66% | D+8.9 | D |
55 | 56.03% | 43.25% | D+12.8 | 48.68% | 49.42% | R+0.7 | D |
56 | 41.06% | 57.56% | R+16.5 | 32.30% | 64.06% | R+31.8 | R |
57 | 62.48% | 36.64% | D+25.8 | 57.73% | 40.44% | D+17.3 | D |
58 | 33.03% | 66.09% | R+33.1 | 28.08% | 69.29% | R+41.2 | R |
59 | 70.58% | 28.54% | D+42 | 67.55% | 30.01% | D+37.5 | D |
60 | 38.35% | 60.80% | R+22.5 | 34.96% | 62.74% | R+27.8 | R |
61 | 51.91% | 47.23% | D+4.7 | 45.72% | 52.23% | R+6.5 | D |
62 | 65.60% | 33.61% | D+32 | 61.45% | 36.39% | D+25.1 | D |
63 | 34.43% | 64.43% | R+30 | 35.35% | 60.23% | R+24.9 | R |
64 | 58.22% | 40.98% | D+17.2 | 53.18% | 45.00% | D+8.2 | D |
65 | 31.75% | 67.08% | R+35.3 | 27.25% | 69.53% | R+42.3 | R |
66 | 72.57% | 26.70% | D+45.9 | 68.93% | 29.57% | D+39.4 | D |
67 | 37.94% | 61.07% | R+23.1 | 35.62% | 60.53% | R+24.9 | R |
68 | 33.20% | 65.40% | R+32.2 | 28.04% | 68.23% | R+40.2 | R |
69 | 31.53% | 66.96% | R+35.4 | 30.88% | 62.14% | R+31.3 | R |
70 | 73.89% | 25.16% | D+48.7 | 70.02% | 27.11% | D+42.9 | D |
71 | 34.78% | 63.68% | R+28.9 | 34.96% | 58.73% | R+23.8 | R |
72 | 68.08% | 29.85% | D+38.2 | 69.16% | 24.22% | D+44.9 | D |
73 | 80.11% | 18.83% | D+61.3 | 77.42% | 18.47% | D+58.9 | D |
74 | 81.27% | 17.11% | D+64.2 | 78.82% | 16.24% | D+62.6 | D |
75 | 42.45% | 55.85% | R+13.4 | 47.88% | 45.26% | D+2.6 | R |
76 | 77.22% | 21.70% | D+55.5 | 76.59% | 19.75% | D+56.8 | D |
77 | 69.65% | 29.43% | D+40.2 | 67.21% | 29.11% | D+38.1 | D |
78 | 49.92% | 48.75% | D+1.2 | 52.86% | 41.64% | D+11.2 | D |
79 | 72.59% | 26.57% | D+46 | 70.85% | 24.80% | D+46.1 | D |
80 | 59.84% | 38.87% | D+21 | 55.10% | 40.89% | D+14.2 | D |
81 | 29.68% | 68.58% | R+38.9 | 29.88% | 64.05% | R+34.2 | R |
82 | 59.20% | 39.93% | D+19.3 | 54.84% | 42.65% | D+12.2 | D |
83 | 28.62% | 69.81% | R+41.2 | 29.03% | 66.20% | R+37.2 | R |
84 | 34.77% | 64.20% | R+29.4 | 31.33% | 65.32% | R+34 | R |
85 | 30.93% | 67.51% | R+36.6 | 31.43% | 62.49% | R+31.1 | R |
86 | 38.58% | 60.04% | R+21.5 | 34.38% | 61.86% | R+27.5 | R |
87 | 20.64% | 78.04% | R+57.4 | 20.68% | 73.42% | R+52.7 | R |
88 | 27.08% | 71.09% | R+44 | 25.84% | 68.79% | R+42.9 | R |
89 | 38.55% | 59.55% | R+21 | 38.45% | 55.10% | R+16.6 | R |
90 | 52.50% | 46.54% | D+6 | 46.55% | 51.10% | R+4.5 | D |
91 | 63.50% | 35.77% | D+27.7 | 58.70% | 39.27% | D+19.4 | D |
92 | 36.52% | 61.43% | R+24.9 | 34.38% | 59.77% | R+25.4 | R |
93 | 59.26% | 39.77% | D+19.5 | 53.51% | 44.10% | D+9.4 | D |
94 | 36.52% | 61.86% | R+25.3 | 34.95% | 58.59% | R+23.6 | R |
95 | 71.56% | 27.77% | D+43.8 | 68.97% | 29.07% | D+39.9 | D |
96 | 29.83% | 68.33% | R+38.5 | 24.42% | 71.46% | R+47 | R |
97 | 42.47% | 56.02% | R+13.5 | 37.05% | 58.73% | R+21.7 | D |
98 | 40.02% | 58.27% | R+18.3 | 38.80% | 54.78% | R+16 | R |
99 | 32.05% | 66.30% | R+34.3 | 35.35% | 58.14% | R+22.8 | R |
100 | 33.71% | 64.76% | R+31 | 30.44% | 64.82% | R+34.4 | R |
101 | 66.78% | 32.31% | D+34.5 | 62.75% | 35.67% | D+27.1 | D |
102 | 60.06% | 38.77% | D+21.3 | 54.07% | 43.50% | D+10.6 | D |
103 | 62.63% | 36.59% | D+26 | 58.02% | 39.82% | D+18.2 | D |
104 | 33.50% | 65.34% | R+31.8 | 28.73% | 68.55% | R+39.8 | R |
105 | 32.43% | 66.37% | R+33.9 | 27.34% | 69.47% | R+42.1 | R |
106 | 31.29% | 67.43% | R+36.1 | 26.95% | 69.91% | R+43 | R |
107 | 37.67% | 60.99% | R+23.3 | 35.21% | 61.33% | R+26.1 | R |
108 | 35.01% | 63.87% | R+28.9 | 33.02% | 62.98% | R+30 | R |
109 | 71.24% | 27.67% | D+43.6 | 68.57% | 27.36% | D+41.2 | D |
110 | 37.37% | 60.72% | R+23.3 | 43.15% | 48.70% | R+5.5 | R |
111 | 78.60% | 19.54% | D+59.1 | 75.33% | 18.53% | D+56.8 | D |
112 | 35.27% | 63.41% | R+28.1 | 38.92% | 54.10% | R+15.2 | R |
113 | 73.23% | 25.55% | D+47.7 | 67.01% | 27.72% | D+39.3 | D |
114 | 38.05% | 60.14% | R+22.1 | 38.63% | 53.60% | R+15 | R |
115 | 40.78% | 57.26% | R+16.5 | 44.68% | 47.55% | R+2.9 | R |
116 | 53.66% | 45.16% | D+8.5 | 49.15% | 46.69% | D+2.5 | D |
117 | 48.43% | 49.82% | R+1.4 | 45.56% | 47.89% | R+2.3 | R |
118 | 42.55% | 56.44% | R+13.9 | 40.94% | 54.97% | R+14 | R |
119 | 48.34% | 49.63% | R+1.3 | 48.31% | 43.53% | D+4.8 | D |
120 | 36.27% | 62.73% | R+26.5 | 36.77% | 59.01% | R+22.2 | R |
121 | 64.89% | 34.33% | D+30.6 | 60.68% | 36.22% | D+24.5 | D |
122 | 61.99% | 37.22% | D+24.8 | 56.78% | 41.26% | D+15.5 | D |
123 | 34.41% | 64.63% | R+30.2 | 39.14% | 56.59% | R+17.5 | R |
124 | 37.53% | 61.16% | R+23.6 | 38.63% | 56.17% | R+17.5 | R |
Total | 44.09% | 54.56% | R+10.5 | 40.67% | 54.94% | R+14.3 | - |
Source: Daily Kos |
State overview
Partisan control
This section details the partisan control of federal and state positions in South Carolina heading into the 2018 elections.
Congressional delegation
- Following the 2016 elections, Republicans held both U.S. Senate seats in South Carolina.
- Republicans held six of seven U.S. House seats in South Carolina.
State executives
- As of September 2018, Republicans held eight of 16 state executive positions and the remaining eight positions were officially nonpartisan.
- The governor of South Carolina was Republican Henry McMaster. The state held an election for governor and lieutenant governor on November 6, 2018.
State legislature
- Republicans controlled both chambers of the South Carolina State Legislature. They had a 80-44 majority in the state House and a 27-19 majority in the state Senate.
Trifecta status
- South Carolina was a Republican trifecta, meaning that the Republican Party controlled the state government. Henry McMaster (R) served as governor, while Republicans controlled the state legislature.
2018 elections
- See also: South Carolina elections, 2018
South Carolina held elections for the following positions in 2018:
- Seven U.S. House seats
- Governor and lieutenant governor
- Eight lower state executive positions
- 124 state House seats
Demographics
Demographic data for South Carolina | ||
---|---|---|
South Carolina | U.S. | |
Total population: | 4,894,834 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 30,061 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 67.2% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 27.5% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 1.4% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.3% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.1% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 5.3% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 85.6% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 25.8% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $45,483 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 22% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in South Carolina. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
As of July 2016, South Carolina's three largest cities were Charleston (pop. est. 135,000), Columbia (pop. est. 133,000), and North Charleston (pop. est. 111,000).[22]
State election history
This section provides an overview of federal and state elections in South Carolina from 2000 to 2016. All data comes from the South Carolina Election Commission.
Historical elections
Presidential elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of the presidential election in South Carolina every year from 2000 to 2016.
Election results (President of the United States), South Carolina 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
54.9% | ![]() |
40.7% | 14.2% |
2012 | ![]() |
54.6% | ![]() |
44.1% | 10.5% |
2008 | ![]() |
53.9% | ![]() |
44.9% | 9.0% |
2004 | ![]() |
58.0% | ![]() |
40.9% | 17.1% |
2000 | ![]() |
56.8% | ![]() |
40.9% | 15.9% |
U.S. Senate elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of U.S. Senate races in South Carolina from 2000 to 2016. Every state has two Senate seats, and each seat goes up for election every six years. The terms of the seats are staggered so that roughly one-third of the seats are up every two years.
Election results (U.S. Senator), South Carolina 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2016 | ![]() |
60.6% | ![]() |
36.9% | 23.7% |
2014[23] | ![]() |
61.1% | ![]() |
37.1% | 24.0% |
2014 | ![]() |
54.3% | ![]() |
38.8% | 15.5% |
2010 | ![]() |
61.5% | ![]() |
27.7% | 33.8% |
2008 | ![]() |
57.5% | ![]() |
42.3% | 15.2% |
2004 | ![]() |
53.7% | ![]() |
44.1% | 9.6% |
2002 | ![]() |
54.4% | ![]() |
44.2% | 10.2% |
Gubernatorial elections, 2000-2016
This chart shows the results of the four gubernatorial elections held between 2000 and 2016. Gubernatorial elections are held every four years in South Carolina.
Election results (Governor), South Carolina 2000-2016 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | First-place candidate | First-place candidate votes (%) | Second-place candidate | Second-place candidate votes (%) | Margin of victory (%) |
2014 | ![]() |
55.9% | ![]() |
41.4% | 14.5% |
2010 | ![]() |
51.4% | ![]() |
46.9% | 4.5% |
2006 | ![]() |
55.1% | ![]() |
44.8% | 10.3% |
2002 | ![]() |
52.8% | ![]() |
47.0% | 5.8% |
Congressional delegation, 2000-2016
This chart shows the number of Democrats and Republicans who were elected to represent South Carolina in the U.S. House from 2000 to 2016. Elections for U.S. House seats are held every two years.
Trifectas, 1992-2017
A state government trifecta occurs when one party controls both chambers of the state legislature and the governor's office.
South Carolina Party Control: 1992-2025
No Democratic trifectas • Twenty-three years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Governor | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Senate | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
House | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
See also
- United States House of Representatives elections in South Carolina, 2018
- United States House elections in South Carolina (June 12, 2018 Republican primaries)
- South Carolina's 4th Congressional District election (June 12, 2018 Republican primary)
- South Carolina's 4th Congressional District election (June 12, 2018 Democratic primary)
- United States House of Representatives elections, 2018
Footnotes
- ↑ The New York Times, "South Carolina Primary Runoff Election Results," June 27, 2018
- ↑ Vote Timmons, "Home," accessed May 31, 2018
- ↑ Pew Research Center, "What is the House Freedom Caucus, and who’s in it?" October 20, 2015
- ↑ Politico, "Conservatives split off from Republican Study Committee," January 13, 2015
- ↑ House Freedom Fund, "Endorsements," accessed May 15, 2018
- ↑ Some candidates were not formally endorsed by the caucus but said they would join if elected. See a list of all Freedom Caucus-affiliated candidates here.
- ↑ This includes all seats not held by members of the Freedom Caucus prior to the 2018 elections, including those held by Democrats.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 FITSNews, "#SC4: Lee Bright Racking Up Endorsements," May 10, 2018
- ↑ Greenville Online, "U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz endorses Lee Bright's bid for S.C. 4th Congressional District seat," June 19, 2018
- ↑ The Club for Growth, "CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC ENDORSES LEE BRIGHT FOR CONGRESS," June 20, 2018
- ↑ Greenville Online, "U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio endorses state Sen. William Timmons in 4th District race," May 8, 2018
- ↑ Federal Election Commission, "South Carolina - House District 4," accessed May 3, 2018
- ↑ Conservative Leadership Fund, "Home," accessed June 19, 2018
- ↑ FITSNews, "Dark Money Group Dropping $200K Against Lee Bright," June 19, 2018
- ↑ Club for Growth, "Club for Growth PAC," accessed March 24, 2016
- ↑ Politico, "Can the Club for Growth Survive Donald Trump?" October 1, 2016
- ↑ The Club for Growth, "CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION RELEASES ADS IN SC-04 EXPOSING WILLIAM TIMMONS’ SUPPORT FOR A GAS TAX INCREASE," June 20, 2018
- ↑ Cook Political Report, "Introducing the 2017 Cook Political Report Partisan Voter Index," April 7, 2017
- ↑ FiveThirtyEight, "Election Update: The Most (And Least) Elastic States And Districts," September 6, 2018
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
- ↑ South Carolina Demographics, "South Carolina Cities by Population," accessed September 5, 2018
- ↑ Special election