South Carolina House of Representatives elections, 2018
- General election: Nov. 6
- Voter registration deadline: Oct. 17
- Early voting: N/A
- Absentee voting deadline: Nov. 6
- Online registration: Yes
- Same-day registration: No
- Voter ID: Photo ID required
- Poll times: 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
|
2020 →
← 2016
|
|
| 2018 South Carolina House elections | |
|---|---|
 | |
| General | November 6, 2018 |
| Primary | June 12, 2018 |
| Primary Runoff | June 26, 2018 |
| Past election results |
| 2016・2014・2012・2010・2008 2006・2004・2002・2000 |
| 2018 elections | |
|---|---|
| Choose a chamber below: | |
Republicans maintained their majority in the 2018 elections for South Carolina House of Representatives, winning 80 seats to Democrats' 44. All 124 House seats were up for election. At the time of the election, Republicans held 80 seats to Democrats' 44.
The Republican Party maintained its trifecta in South Carolina in 2018 by holding its majorities in the state Senate and House and by retaining the governorship.
The South Carolina House of Representatives was one of 87 state legislative chambers with elections in 2018. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
South Carolina state representatives serve two-year terms, with all seats up for election every two years.
For more information about the Democratic primary, click here.
For more information about the Republican primary, click here.
Post-election analysis
- See also: State legislative elections, 2018
The Republican Party maintained control of both chambers of the South Carolina General Assembly following the 2018 election. The state Senate did not hold regular elections. The South Carolina House of Representatives held elections for all 124 seats. The Republican majority in the House of Representatives was maintained at 80-44. Two Democratic incumbents and two Republican incumbents were defeated in the primary. Three incumbents were defeated in the general election; one Democrat and two Republicans.
National background
On November 6, 2018, 87 of the nation's 99 state legislative chambers held regularly scheduled elections for 6,073 of 7,383 total seats, meaning that nearly 82 percent of all state legislative seats were up for election.
- Entering the 2018 election, Democrats held 42.6 percent, Republicans held 56.8 percent, and independents and other parties held 0.6 percent of the seats up for regular election.
- Following the 2018 election, Democrats held 47.3 percent, Republicans held 52.3 percent, and independents and other parties held 0.4 percent of the seats up for regular election.
- A total of 469 incumbents were defeated over the course of the election cycle, with roughly one-third of them defeated in the primary.
Want more information?
- Incumbents defeated in 2018's state legislative elections
- 2018 election analysis: Partisan balance of state legislative chambers
- 2018 election analysis: Number of state legislators by party
- 2018 election analysis: State legislative supermajorities
Candidates
General election
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection
Political party key:
Democratic
Republican
Green Party
Libertarian Party
Working Families Party
Independent Party
American Party
- Fusion voting candidates
- District 15: JA Moore
- District 19: Carrie Counton
- District 45: Corin Buskey
- District 49: John King
- District 69: Beth Ann Rocheleau
- District 75: John Vernon Crangle
- District 81: Elise Fox
- District 85: Sam Edwards
- District 99: Jen Gibson
- District 106: Robin Gause
- District 109: David Mack
- District 112: Joe Preston
- District 115: Carol Tempel
- District 116: Robert Brown
- District 15: JA Moore
Primary runoff
South Carolina House of Representatives Primary Runoff Election 2018 |
|||
|
|||
| Office | Democratic |
Republican |
Other |
| District 5 |
|
||
| District 77 |
|
||
| District 87 |
|
||
| District 110 |
|
||
Primary
Margins of victory
A margin of victory (MOV) analysis for the 2018 South Carolina House of Representatives races is presented in this section. MOV represents the percentage of total votes that separated the winner and the second-place finisher. For example, if the winner of a race received 47 percent of the vote and the second-place finisher received 45 percent of the vote, the MOV is 2 percent.
The table below presents the following figures for each party:
- Elections won
- Elections won by less than 10 percentage points
- Elections won without opposition
- Average margin of victory[1]
| South Carolina House of Representatives: 2018 Margin of Victory Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Elections won | Elections won by less than 10% | Unopposed elections | Average margin of victory[1] |
| Democratic |
||||
| Republican |
||||
 Other |
||||
| Total | ||||
The margin of victory in each race is presented below. The list is sorted from the closest MOV to the largest (including unopposed races).
Seats flipped
The below map displays each seat in the South Carolina House of Representatives which changed partisan hands as a result of the 2018 elections, shaded according to the partisan affiliation of the winner in 2018. Hover over a shaded district for more information.
| State legislative seats flipped in 2018, South Carolina House of Representatives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| District | Incumbent | 2018 winner | Direction of flip |
| South Carolina House of Representatives District 117 | Bill Crosby |
Krystle Simmons |
R to D |
| South Carolina House of Representatives District 15 | Samuel Rivers Jr. |
J.A. Moore |
R to D |
| South Carolina House of Representatives District 42 | Michael Anthony |
Doug Gilliam |
D to R |
| South Carolina House of Representatives District 97 | Patsy Knight |
Mandy Kimmons |
D to R |
Incumbents retiring
Eight incumbents did not run for re-election in 2018.[2] Those incumbents were:
| Name | Party | Office |
|---|---|---|
| Joshua Putnam | Republican |
House District 10 |
| Dan Hamilton | Republican |
House District 20 |
| Derham Cole Jr. | Republican |
House District 32 |
| Michael Anthony | Democratic |
House District 42 |
| Francis Delleney Jr. | Republican |
House District 43 |
| James Smith Jr. | Democratic |
House District 72 |
| Todd Atwater | Republican |
House District 87 |
| Katie Arrington | Republican |
House District 94 |
Process to become a candidate
See statutes: Title 7, Chapter 11 of the South Carolina Code
In South Carolina, a candidate can run as the nominee of a political party, as an independent, or as a write-in.
For partisan candidates
Non-presidential candidates seeking a party nomination for a general or special election must file the State Election Commission’s Statement of Intention of Candidacy/Party Pledge Form (SICPP) and pay the required fee—or submit a fee-petition signed by registered voters equal to the fee—between noon on March 16 and noon on March 30 (with the deadline extended to the next business day if the 30th falls on a weekend or holiday). Federal, statewide, and multi-county district candidates file with the State Election Commission; those running for State Senate, House, or county offices file with their home-county election commission. A candidate who files as a Democrat or Republican must pay a filing fee.[3]
Upon receipt, the filing officer stamps each form and fee receipt with the date and time received, retains the original, provides a copy to the candidate, and forwards a copy to the appropriate party executive committee. No name may appear on any primary ballot, convention slate, or general/special election ballot until certification by that committee, and any minor error or omission in filings must be construed in the candidate’s favor if statutory qualifications are otherwise met.
If, after the close of filing, two or fewer candidates remain for an office and one withdraws or dies, the party committee—or, for legislative seats, the state committee—may at its discretion reopen nominations. Both the county party chair and the state executive committee chair may designate observers to monitor filings. These rules do not apply to nonpartisan school-trustee elections governed by local law, which prevail in the event of any conflict.[4][3]
For independent candidates
An independent candidate must be nominated by petition. The petition must contain signatures equaling at least 5 percent of the qualified registered electors in the geographical area of the office being sought. No petition candidate is required to collect more than 10,000 signatures for any office.[5][6]
Petition candidates for multi-county offices must file their petitions with the South Carolina State Election Commission. All petition candidates for the state legislature also file with the State Election Commission. A petition candidate must also file a statement of economic interests with the State Ethics Commission. Signature requirements are detailed in the table below.[6]
| Petition signature requirements for independent candidates in South Carolina | ||
|---|---|---|
| Office sought | Number of signatures needed | |
| Governor and other statewide offices | 5 percent of the qualified registered voters in the state | |
| State legislators | 5 percent of the qualified registered voters in the district or area to be represented | |
No candidates is required to collect more than 10,000 signatures.[5]
For write-in candidates
Generally, there are no filing forms or fees required to run as a write-in candidate. However, a write-in candidate should notify the appropriate election commission in writing that he or she is conducting a write-in campaign. A candidate who was defeated in a political party's primary may not actively campaign as a write-in candidate for the ensuing election.[6][7]
Qualifications
To be eligible to serve in the South Carolina House of Representatives, a candidate must be:[8]
- A U.S. citizen at the time of filing
- 21 years old at the filing deadline time
- A resident of the district at the filing deadline time
Salaries and per diem
- See also: Comparison of state legislative salaries
| State legislative salaries, 2024[9] | |
|---|---|
| Salary | Per diem |
| $10,400/year | $231/day |
When sworn in
South Carolina legislators assume office the Monday after the election.[10]
South Carolina political history
Party control
2018
In the 2018 elections, there was no change to the partisan balance of the South Carolina House of Representatives.
| South Carolina House of Representatives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Party | As of November 6, 2018 | After November 7, 2018 | |
| Democratic Party | 44 | 44 | |
| Republican Party | 80 | 80 | |
| Total | 124 | 124 | |
2016
In the 2016 elections, Republicans increased their majority in the South Carolina House of Representatives from 78-46 to 80-44.
| South Carolina House of Representatives | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Party | As of November 7, 2016 | After November 8, 2016 | |
| Democratic Party | 46 | 44 | |
| Republican Party | 77 | 80 | |
| Vacancy | 1 | 0 | |
| Total | 124 | 124 | |
Trifectas
A state government trifecta is a term that describes single-party government, when one political party holds the governor's office and has majorities in both chambers of the legislature in a state government. Republicans in South Carolina gained a state government trifecta as a result of the 2002 elections by taking control of the governorship.
South Carolina Party Control: 1992-2025
No Democratic trifectas • Twenty-three years of Republican trifectas
Scroll left and right on the table below to view more years.
| Year | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 08 | 09 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governor | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| Senate | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
| House | D | D | D | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R |
Wave election analysis
- See also: Wave elections (1918-2016)
The term wave election is frequently used to describe an election cycle in which one party makes significant electoral gains. How many seats would Republicans have had to lose for the 2018 midterm election to be considered a wave election?
Ballotpedia examined the results of the 50 election cycles that occurred between 1918 and 2016—spanning from President Woodrow Wilson's (D) second midterm in 1918 to Donald Trump's (R) first presidential election in 2016. We define wave elections as the 20 percent of elections in that period resulting in the greatest seat swings against the president's party.
Applying this definition to state legislative elections, we found that Republicans needed to lose 494 seats for 2018 to qualify as a wave election.
The chart below shows the number of seats the president's party lost in the 10 state legislative waves from 1918 to 2016. Click here to read the full report.
| State legislative wave elections | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | President | Party | Election type | State legislative seats change | Elections analyzed[11] | |
| 1932 | Hoover | R | Presidential | -1,022 | 7,365 | |
| 1922 | Harding | R | First midterm | -907 | 6,907 | |
| 1966 | Johnson | D | First midterm[12] | -782 | 7,561 | |
| 1938 | Roosevelt | D | Second midterm | -769 | 7,179 | |
| 1958 | Eisenhower | R | Second midterm | -702 | 7,627 | |
| 2010 | Obama | D | First midterm | -702 | 7,306 | |
| 1974 | Ford | R | Second midterm[13] | -695 | 7,481 | |
| 1920 | Wilson | D | Presidential | -654 | 6,835 | |
| 1930 | Hoover | R | Presidential | -640 | 7,361 | |
| 1954 | Eisenhower | R | First midterm | -494 | 7,513 | |
Competitiveness
Every year, Ballotpedia uses official candidate lists from each state to examine the competitiveness of every state legislative race in the country. Nationally, there has been a steady decline in electoral competitiveness since 2010. Most notable is that the number of districts with general election competition has dropped by more than 10 percent.
Results from 2016
Click here to read the full study »
Historical context
Uncontested elections: In 2014, 32.8 percent of Americans lived in states with an uncontested state senate election. Similarly, 40.4 percent of Americans lived in states with uncontested house elections. Primary elections were uncontested even more frequently, with 61 percent of people living in states with no contested primaries. Uncontested elections often occur in locations that are so politically one-sided that the result of an election would be a foregone conclusion regardless of whether it was contested or not.
Open seats: In most cases, an incumbent will run for re-election, which decreases the number of open seats available. In 2014, 83 percent of the 6,057 seats up for election saw the incumbent running for re-election. The states that impose term limits on their legislatures typically see a higher percentage of open seats in a given year because a portion of incumbents in each election are forced to leave office. Overall, the number of open seats decreased from 2012 to 2014, dropping from 21.2 percent in 2012 to 17.0 percent in 2014.
Incumbent win rates: Ballotpedia's competitiveness analysis of elections between 1972 and 2014 documented the high propensity for incumbents to win re-election in state legislative elections. In fact, since 1972, the win rate for incumbents had not dropped below 90 percent—with the exception of 1974, when 88 percent of incumbents were re-elected to their seats. Perhaps most importantly, the win rate for incumbents generally increased over time. In 2014, 96.5 percent of incumbents were able to retain their seats. Common convention holds that incumbents are able to leverage their office to maintain their seat. However, the high incumbent win rate may actually be a result of incumbents being more likely to hold seats in districts that are considered safe for their party.
Marginal primaries: Often, competitiveness is measured by examining the rate of elections that have been won by amounts that are considered marginal (5 percent or less). During the 2014 election, 90.1 percent of primary and general election races were won by margins higher than 5 percent. Interestingly, it is usually the case that only one of the two races—primary or general—will be competitive at a time. This means that if a district's general election is competitive, typically one or more of the district's primaries were won by more than 5 percent. The reverse is also true: If a district sees a competitive primary, it is unlikely that the general election for that district will be won by less than 5 percent. Primaries often see very low voter turnout in comparison to general elections. In 2014, there were only 27 million voters for state legislative primaries, but approximately 107 million voters for the state legislative general elections.
Pivot Counties
- See also: Pivot Counties by state
Five of 46 South Carolina counties—10.9 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
| Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
| Barnwell County, South Carolina | 5.16% | 5.33% | 1.65% | ||||
| Calhoun County, South Carolina | 2.83% | 4.31% | 3.55% | ||||
| Chester County, South Carolina | 4.83% | 10.58% | 8.30% | ||||
| Colleton County, South Carolina | 8.49% | 0.19% | 0.53% | ||||
| McCormick County, South Carolina | 3.32% | 3.60% | 6.08% | ||||
In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) won South Carolina with 54.9 percent of the vote. Hillary Clinton (D) received 40.7 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, South Carolina cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 53.3 percent of the time. In that same time frame, South Carolina supported Democratic candidates for president more often than Republican candidates, 53.3 to 43.3 percent. South Carolina favored Republicans in every presidential election between 2000 and 2016.
Presidential results by legislative district
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in South Carolina. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns show the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns show the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. The "Party Control" column notes which party held that seat heading into the 2018 general election. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[14][15]
| In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 39 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 32.8 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 38 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 28.3 points. Clinton won one district controlled by a Republican heading into the 2018 elections. |
| In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 85 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 28.7 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 86 out of 124 state House districts in South Carolina with an average margin of victory of 30.1 points. Trump won seven districts controlled by Democrats heading into the 2018 elections. |
| 2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | Party Control |
| 1 | 23.28% | 75.15% | R+51.9 | 18.61% | 77.65% | R+59 | R |
| 2 | 31.79% | 66.50% | R+34.7 | 28.17% | 66.98% | R+38.8 | R |
| 3 | 35.60% | 61.95% | R+26.4 | 33.39% | 58.53% | R+25.1 | R |
| 4 | 17.87% | 80.08% | R+62.2 | 12.86% | 83.53% | R+70.7 | R |
| 5 | 23.85% | 74.46% | R+50.6 | 20.85% | 74.77% | R+53.9 | R |
| 6 | 30.99% | 67.41% | R+36.4 | 27.78% | 67.13% | R+39.3 | R |
| 7 | 32.32% | 66.10% | R+33.8 | 23.98% | 73.09% | R+49.1 | R |
| 8 | 33.75% | 64.76% | R+31 | 28.69% | 68.03% | R+39.3 | R |
| 9 | 35.55% | 63.02% | R+27.5 | 32.29% | 63.27% | R+31 | R |
| 10 | 22.06% | 76.34% | R+54.3 | 20.11% | 75.76% | R+55.6 | R |
| 11 | 41.13% | 57.49% | R+16.4 | 32.52% | 65.04% | R+32.5 | R |
| 12 | 59.39% | 39.69% | D+19.7 | 53.79% | 43.46% | D+10.3 | D |
| 13 | 32.85% | 65.84% | R+33 | 30.28% | 65.63% | R+35.3 | R |
| 14 | 36.82% | 61.80% | R+25 | 29.74% | 67.30% | R+37.6 | R |
| 15 | 48.83% | 49.47% | R+0.6 | 45.11% | 49.55% | R+4.4 | R |
| 16 | 41.69% | 56.82% | R+15.1 | 36.19% | 59.30% | R+23.1 | R |
| 17 | 21.18% | 76.65% | R+55.5 | 18.81% | 75.94% | R+57.1 | R |
| 18 | 25.25% | 72.79% | R+47.5 | 23.48% | 71.10% | R+47.6 | R |
| 19 | 35.02% | 62.85% | R+27.8 | 34.74% | 59.59% | R+24.9 | R |
| 20 | 27.09% | 70.82% | R+43.7 | 28.31% | 64.69% | R+36.4 | R |
| 21 | 25.57% | 72.91% | R+47.3 | 29.67% | 64.13% | R+34.5 | R |
| 22 | 32.91% | 65.01% | R+32.1 | 35.65% | 56.13% | R+20.5 | R |
| 23 | 64.77% | 33.12% | D+31.6 | 60.89% | 32.19% | D+28.7 | D |
| 24 | 35.96% | 62.42% | R+26.5 | 39.48% | 53.84% | R+14.4 | R |
| 25 | 71.10% | 27.86% | D+43.2 | 65.40% | 31.14% | D+34.3 | D |
| 26 | 35.32% | 62.83% | R+27.5 | 36.60% | 57.21% | R+20.6 | R |
| 27 | 36.38% | 62.10% | R+25.7 | 35.80% | 58.61% | R+22.8 | R |
| 28 | 34.06% | 64.37% | R+30.3 | 32.48% | 62.53% | R+30.1 | R |
| 29 | 33.75% | 64.90% | R+31.2 | 26.63% | 70.63% | R+44 | R |
| 30 | 34.61% | 64.30% | R+29.7 | 27.30% | 70.23% | R+42.9 | R |
| 31 | 79.20% | 19.94% | D+59.3 | 72.36% | 24.44% | D+47.9 | D |
| 32 | 35.50% | 63.00% | R+27.5 | 32.93% | 62.60% | R+29.7 | R |
| 33 | 30.03% | 68.55% | R+38.5 | 25.34% | 71.30% | R+46 | R |
| 34 | 42.65% | 56.21% | R+13.6 | 41.00% | 54.57% | R+13.6 | R |
| 35 | 27.40% | 71.15% | R+43.8 | 27.02% | 67.92% | R+40.9 | R |
| 36 | 38.11% | 60.33% | R+22.2 | 31.58% | 64.35% | R+32.8 | R |
| 37 | 33.05% | 65.49% | R+32.4 | 29.64% | 65.82% | R+36.2 | R |
| 38 | 23.88% | 74.78% | R+50.9 | 18.90% | 77.70% | R+58.8 | R |
| 39 | 32.81% | 65.88% | R+33.1 | 27.32% | 69.52% | R+42.2 | R |
| 40 | 42.28% | 56.63% | R+14.4 | 36.99% | 59.60% | R+22.6 | R |
| 41 | 63.72% | 35.30% | D+28.4 | 61.23% | 35.98% | D+25.3 | D |
| 42 | 44.12% | 54.53% | R+10.4 | 37.44% | 59.80% | R+22.4 | D |
| 43 | 44.83% | 53.97% | R+9.1 | 35.08% | 61.58% | R+26.5 | R |
| 44 | 46.57% | 52.34% | R+5.8 | 38.98% | 58.42% | R+19.4 | D |
| 45 | 35.40% | 63.31% | R+27.9 | 34.76% | 60.44% | R+25.7 | R |
| 46 | 41.87% | 56.57% | R+14.7 | 40.05% | 53.52% | R+13.5 | R |
| 47 | 31.57% | 67.02% | R+35.4 | 26.48% | 68.76% | R+42.3 | R |
| 48 | 35.74% | 62.60% | R+26.9 | 35.12% | 59.40% | R+24.3 | R |
| 49 | 66.67% | 32.40% | D+34.3 | 61.82% | 34.84% | D+27 | D |
| 50 | 63.30% | 35.70% | D+27.6 | 58.24% | 39.47% | D+18.8 | D |
| 51 | 73.57% | 25.50% | D+48.1 | 71.54% | 26.14% | D+45.4 | D |
| 52 | 41.47% | 57.24% | R+15.8 | 37.04% | 59.07% | R+22 | D |
| 53 | 47.26% | 51.83% | R+4.6 | 39.48% | 58.10% | R+18.6 | R |
| 54 | 58.26% | 40.99% | D+17.3 | 53.53% | 44.66% | D+8.9 | D |
| 55 | 56.03% | 43.25% | D+12.8 | 48.68% | 49.42% | R+0.7 | D |
| 56 | 41.06% | 57.56% | R+16.5 | 32.30% | 64.06% | R+31.8 | R |
| 57 | 62.48% | 36.64% | D+25.8 | 57.73% | 40.44% | D+17.3 | D |
| 58 | 33.03% | 66.09% | R+33.1 | 28.08% | 69.29% | R+41.2 | R |
| 59 | 70.58% | 28.54% | D+42 | 67.55% | 30.01% | D+37.5 | D |
| 60 | 38.35% | 60.80% | R+22.5 | 34.96% | 62.74% | R+27.8 | R |
| 61 | 51.91% | 47.23% | D+4.7 | 45.72% | 52.23% | R+6.5 | D |
| 62 | 65.60% | 33.61% | D+32 | 61.45% | 36.39% | D+25.1 | D |
| 63 | 34.43% | 64.43% | R+30 | 35.35% | 60.23% | R+24.9 | R |
| 64 | 58.22% | 40.98% | D+17.2 | 53.18% | 45.00% | D+8.2 | D |
| 65 | 31.75% | 67.08% | R+35.3 | 27.25% | 69.53% | R+42.3 | R |
| 66 | 72.57% | 26.70% | D+45.9 | 68.93% | 29.57% | D+39.4 | D |
| 67 | 37.94% | 61.07% | R+23.1 | 35.62% | 60.53% | R+24.9 | R |
| 68 | 33.20% | 65.40% | R+32.2 | 28.04% | 68.23% | R+40.2 | R |
| 69 | 31.53% | 66.96% | R+35.4 | 30.88% | 62.14% | R+31.3 | R |
| 70 | 73.89% | 25.16% | D+48.7 | 70.02% | 27.11% | D+42.9 | D |
| 71 | 34.78% | 63.68% | R+28.9 | 34.96% | 58.73% | R+23.8 | R |
| 72 | 68.08% | 29.85% | D+38.2 | 69.16% | 24.22% | D+44.9 | D |
| 73 | 80.11% | 18.83% | D+61.3 | 77.42% | 18.47% | D+58.9 | D |
| 74 | 81.27% | 17.11% | D+64.2 | 78.82% | 16.24% | D+62.6 | D |
| 75 | 42.45% | 55.85% | R+13.4 | 47.88% | 45.26% | D+2.6 | R |
| 76 | 77.22% | 21.70% | D+55.5 | 76.59% | 19.75% | D+56.8 | D |
| 77 | 69.65% | 29.43% | D+40.2 | 67.21% | 29.11% | D+38.1 | D |
| 78 | 49.92% | 48.75% | D+1.2 | 52.86% | 41.64% | D+11.2 | D |
| 79 | 72.59% | 26.57% | D+46 | 70.85% | 24.80% | D+46.1 | D |
| 80 | 59.84% | 38.87% | D+21 | 55.10% | 40.89% | D+14.2 | D |
| 81 | 29.68% | 68.58% | R+38.9 | 29.88% | 64.05% | R+34.2 | R |
| 82 | 59.20% | 39.93% | D+19.3 | 54.84% | 42.65% | D+12.2 | D |
| 83 | 28.62% | 69.81% | R+41.2 | 29.03% | 66.20% | R+37.2 | R |
| 84 | 34.77% | 64.20% | R+29.4 | 31.33% | 65.32% | R+34 | R |
| 85 | 30.93% | 67.51% | R+36.6 | 31.43% | 62.49% | R+31.1 | R |
| 86 | 38.58% | 60.04% | R+21.5 | 34.38% | 61.86% | R+27.5 | R |
| 87 | 20.64% | 78.04% | R+57.4 | 20.68% | 73.42% | R+52.7 | R |
| 88 | 27.08% | 71.09% | R+44 | 25.84% | 68.79% | R+42.9 | R |
| 89 | 38.55% | 59.55% | R+21 | 38.45% | 55.10% | R+16.6 | R |
| 90 | 52.50% | 46.54% | D+6 | 46.55% | 51.10% | R+4.5 | D |
| 91 | 63.50% | 35.77% | D+27.7 | 58.70% | 39.27% | D+19.4 | D |
| 92 | 36.52% | 61.43% | R+24.9 | 34.38% | 59.77% | R+25.4 | R |
| 93 | 59.26% | 39.77% | D+19.5 | 53.51% | 44.10% | D+9.4 | D |
| 94 | 36.52% | 61.86% | R+25.3 | 34.95% | 58.59% | R+23.6 | R |
| 95 | 71.56% | 27.77% | D+43.8 | 68.97% | 29.07% | D+39.9 | D |
| 96 | 29.83% | 68.33% | R+38.5 | 24.42% | 71.46% | R+47 | R |
| 97 | 42.47% | 56.02% | R+13.5 | 37.05% | 58.73% | R+21.7 | D |
| 98 | 40.02% | 58.27% | R+18.3 | 38.80% | 54.78% | R+16 | R |
| 99 | 32.05% | 66.30% | R+34.3 | 35.35% | 58.14% | R+22.8 | R |
| 100 | 33.71% | 64.76% | R+31 | 30.44% | 64.82% | R+34.4 | R |
| 101 | 66.78% | 32.31% | D+34.5 | 62.75% | 35.67% | D+27.1 | D |
| 102 | 60.06% | 38.77% | D+21.3 | 54.07% | 43.50% | D+10.6 | D |
| 103 | 62.63% | 36.59% | D+26 | 58.02% | 39.82% | D+18.2 | D |
| 104 | 33.50% | 65.34% | R+31.8 | 28.73% | 68.55% | R+39.8 | R |
| 105 | 32.43% | 66.37% | R+33.9 | 27.34% | 69.47% | R+42.1 | R |
| 106 | 31.29% | 67.43% | R+36.1 | 26.95% | 69.91% | R+43 | R |
| 107 | 37.67% | 60.99% | R+23.3 | 35.21% | 61.33% | R+26.1 | R |
| 108 | 35.01% | 63.87% | R+28.9 | 33.02% | 62.98% | R+30 | R |
| 109 | 71.24% | 27.67% | D+43.6 | 68.57% | 27.36% | D+41.2 | D |
| 110 | 37.37% | 60.72% | R+23.3 | 43.15% | 48.70% | R+5.5 | R |
| 111 | 78.60% | 19.54% | D+59.1 | 75.33% | 18.53% | D+56.8 | D |
| 112 | 35.27% | 63.41% | R+28.1 | 38.92% | 54.10% | R+15.2 | R |
| 113 | 73.23% | 25.55% | D+47.7 | 67.01% | 27.72% | D+39.3 | D |
| 114 | 38.05% | 60.14% | R+22.1 | 38.63% | 53.60% | R+15 | R |
| 115 | 40.78% | 57.26% | R+16.5 | 44.68% | 47.55% | R+2.9 | R |
| 116 | 53.66% | 45.16% | D+8.5 | 49.15% | 46.69% | D+2.5 | D |
| 117 | 48.43% | 49.82% | R+1.4 | 45.56% | 47.89% | R+2.3 | R |
| 118 | 42.55% | 56.44% | R+13.9 | 40.94% | 54.97% | R+14 | R |
| 119 | 48.34% | 49.63% | R+1.3 | 48.31% | 43.53% | D+4.8 | D |
| 120 | 36.27% | 62.73% | R+26.5 | 36.77% | 59.01% | R+22.2 | R |
| 121 | 64.89% | 34.33% | D+30.6 | 60.68% | 36.22% | D+24.5 | D |
| 122 | 61.99% | 37.22% | D+24.8 | 56.78% | 41.26% | D+15.5 | D |
| 123 | 34.41% | 64.63% | R+30.2 | 39.14% | 56.59% | R+17.5 | R |
| 124 | 37.53% | 61.16% | R+23.6 | 38.63% | 56.17% | R+17.5 | R |
| Total | 44.09% | 54.56% | R+10.5 | 40.67% | 54.94% | R+14.3 | - |
| Source: Daily Kos | |||||||
See also
- South Carolina House of Representatives
- South Carolina State Legislature
- State legislative elections, 2018
- South Carolina state legislative Democratic primaries, 2018
- South Carolina state legislative Republican primaries, 2018
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Excludes unopposed elections
- ↑ Ballotpedia defines an incumbent as retiring if the incumbent did not file for office or filed for office but withdrew, was disqualified, or otherwise left a race in a manner other than losing the primary, primary runoff, or convention. If an incumbent runs as a write-in candidate, Ballotpedia does not consider them to be retiring. If an incumbent runs in the same chamber for a different seat, Ballotpedia does not consider them to be retiring.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 South Carolina Code, "Title 7-11-15(a)," accessed April 29, 2025
- ↑ South Carolina State Election Commission, "Filing instructions for partisan candidates," accessed April 29, 2025
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 South Carolina Code, "Title 7-11-70," accessed April 29, 2025
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 South Carolina State Election Commission, "Candidates," accessed April 29, 2025
- ↑ South Carolina Code, "Title 7-11-210," accessed April 29, 2025
- ↑ South Carolina Secretary of State, "Qualifications for office," accessed December 18, 2013
- ↑ National Conference of State Legislatures, "2024 Legislator Compensation," August 21, 2024
- ↑ South Carolina Constitution, "Article III, Section 10," accessed November 1, 2021
- ↑ The number of state legislative seats available for analysis varied, with as many as 7,795 and as few as 6,835.
- ↑ Lyndon Johnson's (D) first term began in November 1963 after the death of President John F. Kennedy (D), who was first elected in 1960. Before Johnson had his first midterm in 1966, he was re-elected president in 1964.
- ↑ Gerald Ford's (R) first term began in August 1974 following the resignation of President Richard Nixon (R), who was first elected in 1968 and was re-elected in 1972. Because Ford only served for two full months before facing the electorate, this election is classified as Nixon's second midterm.
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' statewide election results by congressional and legislative districts," July 9, 2013
- ↑ Daily Kos, "Daily Kos Elections' 2016 presidential results for congressional and legislative districts," February 6, 2017
