South Dakota Referred Law 1, Deadwood Gambling Measure (1993)
South Dakota Referendum 1 | |
---|---|
Election date |
|
Topic Gambling policy |
|
Status |
|
Type Veto referendum |
Origin |
South Dakota Referendum 1 was on the ballot as a veto referendum in South Dakota on November 2, 1993. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported allowing lodging establishments with convention facilities liquor licenses to have more gaming devices than other establishments, and increasing the maximum bet limit. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing lodging establishments with convention facilities liquor licenses to have more gaming devices than other establishments, and increasing the maximum bet limit. |
Election results
South Dakota Referendum 1 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
Yes | 71,422 | 44.49% | ||
89,106 | 55.51% |
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Referendum 1 was as follows:
“ | An act to revise certain provisions related to limited gaming in Deadwood. | ” |
Path to the ballot
A veto referendum is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that asks voters whether to uphold or repeal an enacted law. This type of ballot measure is also called statute referendum, popular referendum, people's veto, or citizen's veto. There are 23 states that allow citizens to initiate veto referendums.
In South Dakota, the number of signatures required for a veto referendum is equal to 5% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. Signatures for veto referendums are due 90 days following the final adjournment of the legislative session at which the targeted bill was passed. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.
See also
External links
Footnotes
![]() |
State of South Dakota Pierre (capital) |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |