South Dakota Decreased Youth Minimum Wage Veto Referendum, Referred Law 20 (2016)
| South Dakota Decreased Youth Minimum Wage Veto Referendum, Referred Law 20 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date November 8, 2016 | |
| Topic Minimum wage | |
Status Defeated | |
| Type Referendum | Origin Citizens |
The South Dakota Youth Minimum Wage Veto Referendum, also known as Referred Law 20, was on the November 8, 2016, ballot in South Dakota as a veto referendum. It was defeated.
| A "yes" vote supported Senate Bill 177 (SB 177), a law decreasing the minimum wage for workers under age 18 from $8.50 to $7.50. |
| A "no" vote opposed SB 177. |
SB 177 also would have provided that the youth minimum wage is not pegged to inflation.[1]
Opponents of Senate Bill 177 collected signatures to put this measure before voters, giving them a chance to overturn the law. Thus, those responsible for putting this measure on the ballot advocated for a "no" vote on election day.
Election results
| Referred Law 20 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| No | 256,686 | 71.13% | ||
| Yes | 104,185 | 28.87% | ||
- Election results from South Dakota Secretary of State
Background
In November 2014, South Dakotans approved Measure 18, which increased the minimum wage from $7.25 per hour to $8.50 per hour beginning January 1, 2015, and it guaranteed an increase in the minimum wage each year after to account for inflation. Measure 18 was backed by the South Dakota Democratic Party.[2]
Republicans in the South Dakota Legislature responded to voter approval of Measure 18 by introducing Senate Bill 177, which was designed to exempt workers under age 18 from receiving the initiative's required minimum wage of $8.50. Gov. Dennis Daugaard (R) signed SB 177 on March 30, 2015.[3]
Text of measure
Attorney General explanation
The Attorney General's ballot explanation was as follows:[4]
| “ | State law requires employers to pay all non-tipped employees a minimum wage, with limited exceptions. Currently, that amount is $8.55 per hour. State law also requires that the minimum wage be adjusted, effective on January 1 of each year, by any increase in the cost of living as measured by the U. S. Department of Labor's Consumer Price Index.
Referred Law 20, if approved, would lower the existing State minimum wage to $7.50 per hour for non-tipped employees under age 18. In addition, no annual cost-of-living wage adjustment would be required for the youth minimum wage. The referred law would also prohibit employers from taking any action to displace an employee or reduce an employee's hours, wages, or benefits, in order to hire someone at the youth minimum wage. A vote "Yes" is for lowering the minimum wage to $7.50 per hour for non-tipped employees under age 18. A vote "No" is against the referred law.[5] |
” |
Full text
The full text of the bill was as follows:[6]
| “ | AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to establish a youth minimum wage.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA: Section 1. That § 60-11-3 be amended to read as follows: 60-11-3. Every employer shall pay to each employee wages at a rate of not less than eight dollars and fifty cents an hour. Violation of this section is a Class 2 misdemeanor. The provisions of this section do not apply to certain employees being paid an opportunity wage pursuant to § 60-11-4.1, babysitters, employees under age eighteen, or outside salespersons. The provisions of this section also do not apply to employees employed by an amusement or recreational establishment, an organized camp, or a religious or nonprofit educational conference center if one of the following apply: (1) The establishment, camp, or center does not operate for more than seven months in any calendar year; or (2) During the preceding calendar year, the average receipts of the establishment, camp, or center for any six months of the calendar year were not more than thirty-three and onethird percent of its average receipts for the other six months of the year. Section 2. That chapter 60-11 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows: An employer shall pay an employee under the age of eighteen at least seven dollars and fifty cents an hour. This wage is not subject to the annual minimum wage adjustment pursuant to § 60-11- 3.2. No employer may take any action to displace an employee, including a partial displacement through a reduction in hours, wages, or employment benefits, in order to hire an employee at the wage authorized in this Act.[5] |
” |
Support for "yes" vote
Those who support/supported a "yes" vote on this measure and opposed the veto referendum petition effort targeting Senate Bill 177 are referred to as supporters in this article.
SD Voice filed to support the "yes" vote.[7]
Official argument for "yes" vote
The official argument for a "yes" vote on this measure as listed in the "South Dakota 2016 Ballot Question Pamphlet" was as follows:[8]
| “ |
Young people in South Dakota deserve a fair shot at a first job. That’s why South Dakota residents should vote YES on Referred Law 20 – SB 177, an Act that establishes a youth training wage while respecting the will of voters to raise the minimum wage for adults. When South Dakota approved a minimum wage increase last November, voters might not have realized that the policy could unintentionally price the state’s youngest jobseekers out of the workforce. Sadly, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office confirms that this is what happens when the minimum wage goes up. That’s the problem; SB 177 is the solution. A study published by Cornell University found that the creation of a youth training wage can help alleviate the negative effects of a minimum wage increase on young employees. It makes intuitive sense: If the state’s small businesses can pay a training wage to young adults who don’t have extensive workplace experience, they’re less likely to “downsize” that job. That means young people will continue to receive all benefits associated with a first job, like higher pay and greater job security in the future. Economists have shown that just 20 hours of part-time work per week during the senior year of high school results in annual earnings that are 20 percent higher after graduation, relative to young adults who don’t work. Another study shows that young adults who are unemployed today are missing out on more than a paycheck---they’re also at a greater risk of future unemployment. You can’t start climbing the career ladder without a first rung. A youth training wage provision would ensure that, even as the minimum wage in South Dakota rises, this first rung still exists. Michael Saltsman Research Director Employment Policies Institute Saltsman@EPIOnline.org [5] |
” |
Opposition to "yes" vote
Those who oppose/opposed a "yes" vote on this measure and supported the veto referendum petition effort targeting Senate Bill 177 are referred to as opponents in this article.
Opponents to "yes" vote
- South Dakota Democratic Party[2]
- Teamsters Local 120
- Our Revolution[9]
Official argument against "yes" vote
The official argument against a "yes" vote on this measure as listed in the "South Dakota 2016 Ballot Question Pamphlet" was as follows:[8]
| “ |
Voting NO on Referred Law 20 keeps the current minimum wage for all workers. Voting NO on 20 prevents the creation of an unnecessary and undemocratic sub-minimum wage for teenagers. The state legislature attempted to create this “youth minimum wage” in 2015, but thousands of South Dakota voters prevented that pay cut from taking effect by signing a petition to refer it to a statewide vote. Voting NO on 20 stops that pay cut for good. There are two reasons to vote NO on 20. First, Referred Law 20 attacks South Dakota voters. In November 2014, we passed Initiated Measure 18 by a 55% to 45% margin. This statewide vote raised the state minimum wage from $7.25 an hour to $8.50 an hour with an annual inflation adjustment. Thanks to that measure, the state minimum wage is now $8.55 an hour. The state legislature attempted to undermine this measure by creating a lower subminimum wage of $7.50 an hour for workers under age 18. This youth minimum wage tries to overturn our majority vote in the 2014 election. Thus, voters who respect South Dakota’s long history of direct democracy should vote NO on Referred Law 20. Second, Referred Law 20 is also entirely unnecessary. Despite dire warnings from legislators backing the youth minimum wage, South Dakota’s labor market has continued to expand and unemployment has decreased. Paying young workers the same minimum wage as adults helps younger workers earn more to support their families and go to college without harming South Dakota’s strong economy. Please, vote NO on Referred Law 20. This legislation attacks the will of South Dakota voters and serves no good purpose in our robust labor market. Reynold F. Nesiba 201 S. Menlo Ave Sioux Falls, SD, 57104 [5] |
” |
Campaign finance
| Total campaign contributions[10] as of February 8, 2017[11] | |
 Support:
|
$456.82 |
 Opposition:
|
$0.00 |
As of February 8, 2017, the support campaign for this measure featured one ballot question committee, SD Voice, that received a total of $456.82 in contributions, all of which were cash donations. The support campaign spent $456.82.[7]
No ballot question committees registered to oppose the ballot measure.[7]
Support for "yes" vote
Cash donations
The following ballot question committee was registered to support this initiative. The chart below shows cash donations and expenditures current as of February 8, 2017.[7]
| Committee | Amount raised[12] | Amount spent |
|---|---|---|
| SD Voice | $456.82 | $456.82 |
| Total | $456.82 | $456.82 |
Methodology
In calculating campaign finance for supporting and opposing committees, Ballotpedia does not count donations or expenditures from one ballot measure committee to another since that would amount to counting the same money twice. This method is used to give the most accurate information concerning how much funding was actually provided to and spent by the opposing and supporting campaigns.
Ballotpedia subtracts out committee-to-committee contributions—both cash donations and in-kind contributions. Because of this, it is possible for certain committees to have negative contributions. Negative contributions mean that a committee has provided more contributions to other committees than it has received. If expenditures exceed contributions, it means the committee has accrued unpaid bills, has unpaid or unforgiven loans, or has contributed a certain amount of in-kind services to another committee.
Ballotpedia provides information about all reported in-kind donations. In-kind contributions are also counted towards total expenditures since, with in-kind gifts, the contribution and services or goods are provided simultaneously. Ballotpedia does this to provide the most accurate information about the cash-on-hand of supporting and opposing campaigns.
Path to the ballot
Opponents of Senate Bill 177 were required to collect a minimum of 13,870 valid signatures by June 29, 2015, for the veto referendum to appear on the November 8, 2016, ballot.[2]
On June 29, 2015, petitioners reported collecting thousands of signatures in excess of the 13,870 requirement.[13] The initiative was certified on June 30. A total of 17,077 signatures were valid.[14]
Cost of signature collection:
Ballotpedia found no petition companies that received payment from the sponsors of this measure, which means signatures were likely gathered largely by volunteers. A total of $0 was spent to collect the 13,870 valid signatures required to put this measure before voters, resulting in a total cost per required signature (CPRS) of $0.[15]
State profile
This excerpt is reprinted here with the permission of the 2016 edition of the Almanac of American Politics and is up to date as of the publication date of that edition. All text is reproduced verbatim, though links have been added by Ballotpedia staff. To read the full chapter on South Dakota, click here.
South Dakota is renowned for its natural beauty: you can see bison, bighorn sheep and elk at Custer State Park, ranked by Austin Adventures as one of the 10 best places for wildlife viewing in the world. But today the state is also prominent in the financial realm, and names like Citibank, Wells Fargo and Capital One are easily spotted on office buildings in Sioux Falls.
Lewis and Clark encountered herds of buffalo as they paddled up the Missouri River in the fall of 1804 through land where the Oglala Sioux became masters of the horses the Spaniards had imported to North America 350 years earlier. Fort Pierre was established as a fur-trading post in 1817 and Congress established the Dakota Territory in 1861, but few white men settled here until the 1880s. The Sioux remained dominant and their warrior chief Sitting Bull, now buried on a bluff above the Missouri River, destroyed Gen. George Armstrong Custer and his 7th Cavalry troops at Little Big Horn in 1876. Fourteen years later, many of the remaining Oglala Sioux Indians in South Dakota were massacred at Wounded Knee. After half a century of disease and a decade of ... (read more)
| Demographic data for South Dakota | ||
|---|---|---|
| South Dakota | U.S. | |
| Total population: | 834,708 | 314,107,084 |
| Land area (sq mi): | 75,811 | 3,531,905 |
| Gender | ||
| Female: | 49.7% | 50.8% |
| Race and ethnicity | ||
| White: | 83.6% | 62.8% |
| Black/African American: | 1.5% | 12.6% |
| Asian: | 1.1% | 5% |
| Native American: | 8.6% | 0.8% |
| Pacific Islander: | 0% | 0.2% |
| Two or more: | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Hispanic/Latino: | 3.2% | 16.9% |
| Education | ||
| High school graduation rate: | 90.7% | 86.3% |
| College graduation rate: | 26.7% | 29.3% |
| Income | ||
| Median household income: | $50,338 | $53,482 |
| Persons below poverty level: | 14.2% | 14.8% |
| Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2014) | ||
Presidential Voting Pattern
The percentages below show South Dakota voter preference in general election presidential races.
South Dakota vote percentages
- 2012: 39.9% Democratic / 57.9% Republican
- 2008: 44.7% Democratic / 53.2% Republican
- 2004: 38.4% Democratic / 59.9% Republican
- 2000: 37.6% Democratic / 60.3% Republican
U.S. vote percentages
- 2012: 51.1% Democratic / 47.2% Republican
- 2008: 52.9% Democratic / 45.7% Republican
- 2004: 48.3% Democratic / 50.7% Republican
- 2000: 48.4% Democratic / 47.9% Republican
More South Dakota coverage on Ballotpedia
- Elections in South Dakota
- United States congressional delegations from South Dakota
- Public policy in South Dakota
- Influencers in South Dakota
- Verbatim South Dakota fact checks
- More...
Related measures
| Minimum wage measures on the ballot in 2016 | |
|---|---|
| State | Measures |
| Arizona | Arizona Minimum Wage and Paid Time Off, Proposition 206 
|
| Colorado | Colorado $12 Minimum Wage, Amendment 70
|
| Maine | Maine Minimum Wage Increase, Question 4
|
| Washington | Washington Minimum Wage Increase, Initiative 1433 |
Recent news
The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for the terms South Dakota Youth Minimum Wage. These results are automatically generated from Google. Ballotpedia does not curate or endorse these articles; they are included to provide readers with the most recent news articles on the subject. Click here to learn more about this section.
South Dakota Decreased Youth Minimum Wage Veto Referendum, Referred Law 20 (2016) - Google News Feed
- Loading...
See also
- 2016 ballot measures
- South Dakota 2016 ballot measures
- Laws governing the initiative process in South Dakota
- Minimum wage reports and analyses
External links
Sponsor contact information
- Cory Heidelberger - 912 N 1st St., Aberdeen, SD 57401
Footnotes
- ↑ South Dakota Legislature, "Senate Bill 177," accessed June 30, 2015
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 International Business Times, "South Dakota Minimum Wage Battle Heats Up: Ballot Proposal Would Raise Pay For Youth Workers," April 7, 2015
- ↑ South Dakota Legislature, "Senate Bill 177 History," accessed June 30, 2015
- ↑ South Dakota Secretary of State, "Attorney General 2016 ballot explanation, Referred Law 20," accessed May 2, 2016
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributed to the original source.
- ↑ South Dakota Legislature, "SB 177," accessed July 1, 2016
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 South Dakota Secretary of State, "Campaign Finance Statement," accessed October 31, 2016
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 South Dakota Secretary of State, "South Dakota 2016 Ballot Question Pamphlet," accessed August 18, 2016
- ↑ Our Revolution, "Ballot Initiatives," accessed October 20, 2016
- ↑ Note: These totals include all contributions and may include in-kind donations as well as cash donations.
- ↑ Note: This date is the most recent date on which Ballotpedia staff researched campaign finance data. The actual date through which this information is accurate depends on the campaign finance reporting requirements in this state.
- ↑ Note: The totals listed below do not include in-kind donations, which are detailed in a separate section below.
- ↑ Rapid City Journal, "Activists deliver papers to block election law, youth wage," June 29, 2015
- ↑ KSFY, "Youth minimum wage now in the hands of South Dakota voters," June 30, 2015
- ↑ South Dakota Secretary of State Campaign Finance Reporting System, "SD Voice," accessed September 22, 2016
| ||
 |
State of South Dakota Pierre (capital) |
|---|---|
| Ballot Measures |
List of South Dakota ballot measures | Local measures | School bond issues | Ballot measure laws | Initiative laws | History of I&R | Campaign Finance Requirements | Recall process | |
| Government |
South Dakota State Constitution | House of Representatives | Senate | Legislative Research Council | Auditor General | |
| State executive officers |
Governor | Lieutenant Governor | Attorney General | Secretary of State | Treasurer | State Auditor | Secretary of Education | Director of Insurance | Secretary of Agriculture | Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources | Secretary of Labor | Chairman of Public Utilities | |
| School boards |
South Dakota Department of Education | South Dakota school districts | |
| Judiciary |
South Dakota Supreme Court | South Dakota Circuit Courts | South Dakota Magistrate Courts | Judicial selection in South Dakota | |
| Transparency Topics |
Sunshine Law | Open Records procedures | Transparency Advocates | Transparency blogs | State budget | Taxpayer-funded lobbying associations | |
| Divisions |
State |
List of Counties |
List of Cities |
List of School Districts | |
