Become part of the movement for unbiased, accessible election information. Donate today.
South Dakota Referred Law 1, Local Liquor Option Initiative (1914)
| South Dakota Referred Law 1 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Alcohol laws and Local government organization |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Indirect initiated state statute |
Origin |
South Dakota Referred Law 1 was on the ballot as an indirect initiated state statute in South Dakota on November 3, 1914. It was defeated.
A "yes" vote supported allowing the sale of alcohol in retail stores. |
A "no" vote opposed allowing the sale of alcohol in retail stores. |
Election results
|
South Dakota Referred Law 1 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
| Yes | 38,000 | 42.33% | ||
|
|
51,779 | 57.67% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Referred Law 1 was as follows:
| “ | Shall intoxicating liquors be sold at retail? | ” |
Path to the ballot
- See also: Indirect initiated state statute
From 1898 to 1988, initiated statutes were indirect in South Dakota. Voters made the process direct with approval of Amendment A in 1988.
An indirect initiated state statute is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends state statute. There are nine (9) states that allow citizens to initiate indirect state statutes.
While a direct initiative is placed on the ballot once supporters file the required number of valid signatures, an indirect initiative is first presented to the state legislature. Legislators have a certain number of days, depending on the state, to adopt the initiative into law. Should legislators take no action or reject the initiative, the initiative is put on the ballot for voters to decide.
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of South Dakota Pierre (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
