South Dakota Referred Law 4, Telecommunications Regulations Measure (1988)
| South Dakota Referred Law 4 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Election date |
|
| Topic Business regulations and Telecommunications infrastructure |
|
| Status |
|
| Type Veto referendum |
Origin |
South Dakota Referred Law 4 was on the ballot as a veto referendum in South Dakota on November 8, 1988. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported revising the regulations on telecommunications companies from the Public Utilities Commission. |
A "no" vote opposed revising the regulations on telecommunications companies from the Public Utilities Commission. |
Election results
|
South Dakota Referred Law 4 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
|
|
161,173 | 53.04% | ||
| No | 142,695 | 46.96% | ||
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Referred Law 4 was as follows:
| “ | An Act to revise the regulation of certain interstate telecommunication services and to make certain trade regulation laws applicable to certain telecommunication services. | ” |
Path to the ballot
A veto referendum is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that asks voters whether to uphold or repeal an enacted law. This type of ballot measure is also called statute referendum, popular referendum, people's veto, or citizen's veto. There are 23 states that allow citizens to initiate veto referendums.
In South Dakota, the number of signatures required for a veto referendum is equal to 5% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. Signatures for veto referendums are due 90 days following the final adjournment of the legislative session at which the targeted bill was passed. A simple majority vote is required for voter approval.
See also
External links
Footnotes
 |
State of South Dakota Pierre (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2025 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
